Actionability Assertions

Gene Condition (MONDO ID) OMIM ID Final Assertion
KCNQ1 long QT syndrome 1 (0100316) 192500 Strong Actionability
KCNH2 long QT syndrome 2 (0013367) 613688 Strong Actionability
SCN5A long QT syndrome 3 (0011377) 603830 Strong Actionability

Actionability Assertion Rationale

  • All experts agreed with the assertion computed according to the rubric.

Actionability Scores

Outcome / Intervention Pair Severity Likelihood Effectiveness Nature of Intervention Total Score
Sudden cardiac death / Beta blockers 3 2C 3A 3 11CA
Sudden cardiac death / Avoidance of QT-prolonging medications 3 2C 2N 3 10CN
Sudden cardiac death / Beta blockers 3 2C 2A 3 10CA
Sudden cardiac death / Avoidance of QT-prolonging medications 3 2C 3N 3 11CN
View scoring key
Domain of Actionability Scoring Metric State of the Knowledgebase
Severity: What is the nature of the threat to health to an individual? 3 = Sudden death as a reasonably possible outcome
2 = Reasonable possibility of death or major morbidity
1 = Modest morbidity
0 = Minimal or no morbidity
N/A
Likelihood: What is the chance that the outcome will occur? 3 = >40% chance
2 = 5%-39% chance
1 = 1%-4% chance
0 = <1% chance
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Effectiveness: What is the effectiveness of a specific intervention in preventing or diminishing the risk of harm? 3 = Highly effective
2 = Moderately effective
1 = Minimally effective
0 = Controversial or unknown effectiveness
IN = Ineffective/No interventiona
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Nature of intervention: How risky, medically burdensome, or intensive is the intervention? 3 = Low risk, or medically acceptable and low intensity
2 = Moderate risk, moderately acceptable or intensive
1 = Greater risk, less acceptable and substantial intensity
0 = High risk, poorly acceptable or intensive
N/A
a Do not score the remaining categories

Prevalence of the Genetic Condition

The prevalence of long QT syndrome (LQTS) has been estimated at 1:2,500.
View Citations

Waddell-Smith KE, et al. (2016) PMID: 27262388, Priori SG, et al. (2015) PMID: 26318695, Romano-Ward syndrome. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 101016., Familial long QT syndrome. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 768., M Alders, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1129

Clinical Features (Signs / symptoms)

This report focuses on LQTS types 1, 2, and 3 (LQT1, LQT2, and LQT3, respectively) which are not associated with extracardiac manifestations (historically termed Romano-Ward syndrome) and account for the majority of cases. LQTS is a cardiac electrophysiological disorder characterized by QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes (TdP) ventricular tachycardia in the absence of structural heart disease. TdP may be self-terminating, resulting in a syncopal event, which is the most common symptom in individuals with LQTS. Such cardiac events typically occur without warning. TdP can degenerate into a malignant ventricular arrhythmia which may result in sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) or sudden cardiac death (SCD). The precipitating conditions associated with arrhythmic events vary with subtype with most arrhythmic events occurring during exercise in LQT1; at rest, during emotional stress, and with sudden noises in LQT2; and at rest or during sleep in LQT3.
View Citations

Waddell-Smith KE, et al. (2016) PMID: 27262388, Priori SG, et al. (2015) PMID: 26318695, Romano-Ward syndrome. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 101016., M Alders, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1129, Epstein AE, et al. (2013) PMID: 23265327, Ahn J, et al. (2017) PMID: 29059199, Friederich P, Pfitzenmayer H. (2014) URL: www.orpha.net.

Natural History (Important subgroups & survival / recovery)

LQTS has been identified in all ethnic groups. The mean age at presentation of LQTS is 14 years. Cardiac events may occur at any age, but are most common from the pre-teen years through the 20s. Cardiac events are often triggered by administration of a QT-prolonging drug or hypokalemia. It has been estimated that 50% or fewer of untreated individuals with a pathogenic variant in one of the genes associated with LQTS have symptoms, usually one to a few syncopal events. Of individuals who die of complications of LQTS, death is the first sign of the disorder in an estimated 10-15%. LQTS patients at the highest risk for cardiac events include those with QTc >500 ms, LQT2 and LQT3, females with LQT2, onset of symptoms at <10 years of age, and patients with prior cardiac arrest or recurrent unexplained syncope. For asymptomatic males with LQTS, the risk of cardiac events is highest in childhood. Adult females with LQT2 and QTc>500 ms are at increased risk of SCA/SCD, especially in the 9 months postpartum. The prognosis of the disease is usually excellent in patients that are correctly diagnosed and treated.
View Citations

Waddell-Smith KE, et al. (2016) PMID: 27262388, Priori SG, et al. (2015) PMID: 26318695, Romano-Ward syndrome. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 101016., Familial long QT syndrome. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 768., Al-Khatib SM, et al. (2018) PMID: 29084731

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Dominant

Prevalence of Genetic Variants

Unknown
The prevalence of pathogenic variants associated with LQT1, 2 and 3 was not available.
Unknown
It has been estimated that 60-75% of LQTS can be attributed to pathogenic variants in KCNQ1, KCNH2, and SCN5A (all gain of function for SCN5A).
Tier 3 View Citations

M Alders, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1129

Unknown
However, the yield of genetic testing has been as high as 90% for these three genes in some LQTS cohorts.
Tier 5 View Citations

Adler A, et al. (2016) PMID: 26743238

Penetrance (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

5-39 %
LQTS exhibits reduced penetrance of the ECG changes and symptoms. ). It has been estimated that 50% or fewer of untreated individuals with a pathogenic variant in one of the genes associated with LQTS have symptoms, usually one to a few syncopal events. Overall, approximately 25% of individuals with a pathogenic variant have a normal QTc on baseline ECG. The percentage of genetically affected individuals with a normal QTc was higher in LQT1 (36%) than in LQT2 (19%) or LQT3 (10%). Registry data (can include patients, individuals with a pathogenic variant [mostly treated], and also relatives who died suddenly) show a cumulative mortality before age 40 years of 6-8% in LQT1, LQT2, and LQT3. In individuals between age 0 and 18 years, those with LQT1, LQT2, or LQT3 had a cumulative mortality of 2%, 3%, and 7%, respectively. From age 19 to 40 years, mortality rates were 5%, 7%, and 5%, respectively.
Tier 3 View Citations

M Alders, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1129

Syncopal events in LQTS are associated with an increased risk of subsequent cardiac arrest. The annual rate of SCD in patients with untreated LQTS is between 0.33 and 0.9% overall and estimated to be 5% for those with syncope.
Tier 3 View Citations

Priori SG, et al. (2015) PMID: 26318695, Brignole M, et al. (2018) PMID: 29562304

Risk of life-threatening arrhythmia in asymptomatic genotype positive individuals is 4% by age 40 years, compared to 0.4% in genotype negative family controls.
Tier 3 View Citations

Waddell-Smith KE, et al. (2016) PMID: 27262388

An evaluation of 647 patients reported that the incidence of a first cardiac event (defined as syncope, cardiac arrest, or SCD) before the age of 40 was lower among patients with LQT1 (30%) compared to patients with LQT2 (46%) and LQT3 (42%). Looking at just cardiac arrest or SCD, the incidence was still lower in LQT1 (37/386 or 10%) compared to LQT2 (41/206 or 20%) and LQT3 (9/55 or 16%).
Tier 5 View Citations

Priori SG, et al. (2003) PMID: 12736279

In a longitudinal care study of 88 patients with definite or probable LQTS treated in a specialized inherited arrhythmia clinic, 29 patients (33%) had a history of a cardiac event (SCA, documented torsade de pointes, syncope, or seizure). No patients experienced SCD or arrhythmic syncope during long-term follow-up (median of 4.6 years) and mortality remained at 0 during a follow-up of 520 patient-years.
Tier 5 View Citations

Adler A, et al. (2016) PMID: 26743238

Expressivity

Considerable phenotypic variability within families has been reported.
Tier 3 View Citations

M Alders, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1129

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Patient Management

To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with LQTS, the main focus in the management of individuals with LQTS is to identify the subset of individuals at high risk for cardiac events. For this risk stratification the following evaluations are recommended:

• ECG evaluation for QTc interval

• Medical history: for syncope or cardiac arrest

• Other: consultation with a clinical geneticist and/or genetic counselor.

Tier 3 View Citations

M Alders, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1129

In patients with LQTS with a resting QTc greater than 470ms, a beta blocker is recommended. In asymptomatic patients with LQTS and a resting QTc less than 470ms, chronic therapy with a beta blocker is considered reasonable. Beta blockers reduce adverse cardiac events for LQT1 (>95%), LQT2 (>75%), and females with LQT3 (>60%). There are limited data regarding efficacy of beta blockers in males with LQT3 but, in selected patients, beta blockers can be protective against SCA. Asymptomatic adult (male) LQTS patients with normal QTc intervals may choose to decline beta-blocker therapy.
Tier 1 View Citations

Priori SG, et al. (2015) PMID: 26318695, Al-Khatib SM, et al. (2018) PMID: 29084731, Shen WK, et al. (2017) PMID: 28280232

A meta-analysis of 10 studies (7 registry-based cohort studies [Cohort] and 3 interrupted time series studies [ITS]) involving 9,727 patients with LQTS investigated the use of beta-blockers and cardiac events (syncope, aborted cardiac arrest [ACA], and SCD). Using Cohort data, the use of a beta-blocker was associated with significant risk reduction of all cardiac events (HR=0.49, p<0.001) and serious cardiac events (ACA or SCD) (HR=0.47, p<0.001). For LQTS subtypes, beta-blocker therapy reduced cardiac events in LQT1 (HR=0.59, p<0.001) and LQT2 (HR=0.39, p<0.001). Using ITS data, 870 events occurred before beta-blocker therapy, which was reduced significantly by 61% (352 events) after taking beta-blockers (RR=0.39, 95% CI: 0.32-0.46). Risk of cardiac events was reduced in LQT1 by 71% (RR=0.29, 95% CI: 0.20-0.41) and in LQT2 by 52% (RR=0.48, 95% CI: 0.30-0.77). In LQT3, however, there was no significant difference in reduction of risk for cardiac events between before and after use of a beta-blocker. The authors note that the lack of sufficient data for beta-blocker use in LQT3 does not imply that beta-blockers should be prohibited in this subtype and cite a prior study of 403 patients with LQT3 that reported that beta-blocker therapy was associated with an 83% reduction in cardiac events in females (p=0.015) but not males.(
Tier 1 View Citations

Ahn J, et al. (2017) PMID: 29059199

Implantation with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) can be effective in reducing SCD in LQTS patients. ICD implantation is recommended for high risk LQTS patients (where high risk is defined as patients with a previous SCA, recurrent unexplained syncope and/or ventricular tachycardia, and in whom beta blocker use is ineffective or not tolerated). In one study of high-risk LQT patients, 1.3% mortality was reported in ICD-treated (n=73) vs. 16 % in untreated (n=161) patients, but the difference was not significant at p=0.07. Two additional smaller studies of patients with ICD treatment reported no mortality over an average 3 year follow-up. Cohort studies have reported appropriate ICD therapy rates from 37-65% and inappropriate therapy rates from 11-33%.
Tier 1 View Citations

Priori SG, et al. (2015) PMID: 26318695, Epstein AE, et al. (2013) PMID: 23265327, Al-Khatib SM, et al. (2018) PMID: 29084731, Shen WK, et al. (2017) PMID: 28280232

Use of additional medications is guided by LQTS type. In LQT3 sodium channel blockers (ranolazine, mexiletine, and flecainide) may shorten the QTc and have been used to reduce recurrent arrhythmias in case reports.
Tier 1 View Citations

Priori SG, et al. (2015) PMID: 26318695, Al-Khatib SM, et al. (2018) PMID: 29084731

Although the incidence of arrhythmias during elective interventions such as surgery, endoscopies, childbirth, or dental work is low, it is prudent to monitor the ECG during such interventions and to alert the appropriate medical personnel for prevention (e.g. avoidance of epinephrine during dental procedures, anti-emetics post-surgery such as Zofran) and in case intervention is needed.
Tier 4 View Citations

M Alders, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1129

Women with LQT2 are at higher risk of postpartum SCA/SCD and should receive prepregnancy counseling.
Tier 1 View Citations

Al-Khatib SM, et al. (2018) PMID: 29084731

Circumstances to Avoid

With all forms of LQTS, a degree of caution with sporting activity is recommended. There is increasing evidence that the risk is low if patients adhere to beta blocker therapy. Exercise precautions are more imperative with LQT1, or in those who have already experienced events during exercise, than in LQT2 and LQT3. Such individuals should generally be advised away from becoming professional athletes.
Tier 2 View Citations

Waddell-Smith KE, et al. (2016) PMID: 27262388

Because the risk of adverse events increases in patients with LQTS with prolongation of the QTc >500 ms, QT-prolonging medications and electrolyte depleting medications (e.g. diuretics) should not be used in patients with LQTS unless there is no suitable alternative. Episodes of torsades de pointes can be precipitated by exposure to a QT prolonging medication, or hypokalemia induced by diuretics or gastrointestinal illness.
Tier 1 View Citations

Al-Khatib SM, et al. (2018) PMID: 29084731, Shen WK, et al. (2017) PMID: 28280232

A retrospective study of cardiac events in 216 genotyped LQT1 patients found that, prior to the initiation of beta blocker therapy, the use of QT-prolonging drugs was associated with a markedly increased risk of cardiac arrest compared with patients not on these drugs (53%; 95% CI, 28-77% vs. 8.5%; 95% CI, 5-13%, respectively; unadjusted odds ratio, 12.0; 95% CI, 4.1 to 35.3; P<0.001). QT-prolonging and other potentially proarrhythmic medications used by the study population encompassed almost all drug classes that should be avoided by LQTS patients.
Tier 5 View Citations

Vincent GM, et al. (2009) PMID: 19118258

In LQT1 patients, and other LQTS patients with a history of exercise induced syncope, swimming and diving are generally contraindicated. However, many patients choose to continue with swimming, and these are sometimes managed by the use of an advisory defibrillator with a supervisor at the pool-side, and adjuvant cardiac sympathectomy may be used.
Tier 2 View Citations

Waddell-Smith KE, et al. (2016) PMID: 27262388, Priori SG, et al. (2015) PMID: 26318695

LQT2 patients, or other LQTS patients who have experienced auditory-evoked cardiac events, should avoid exposure to acoustic stimuli especially during sleep (removing loud alarm clocks and turning down the volume on the phone at night).
Tier 2 View Citations

Waddell-Smith KE, et al. (2016) PMID: 27262388, Priori SG, et al. (2015) PMID: 26318695

Patients with LQTS should avoid or rapidly correct any electrolyte abnormalities (hypokalemia, hypomagnesaemia, hypocalcemia) that may occur during diarrhea, vomiting, metabolic conditions, or imbalanced diets for weight loss.
Tier 2 View Citations

Priori SG, et al. (2015) PMID: 26318695

Epinephrine must be avoided as an adjuvant medication in regional anesthesia because it could provoke life-threatening arrhythmias. Atropine should also always be avoided because of its effect on heart rate and because it removes the cholinergic-adrenergic antagonism.
Tier 4 View Citations

Friederich P, Pfitzenmayer H. (2014) URL: www.orpha.net.

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Nature of Intervention

The identified interventions include beta-blockers and avoidance of QT prolonging drugs in all patients. Implantation of an ICD is an uncommon primary intervention which would involve invasive surgery and device maintenance, potentially starting at a young age. Inappropriate ICD shocks and device complications are reported in 8-35%, which can be minimized with concurrent beta-blocker therapy, optimal device programming, and appropriate lead selection. A meta-analysis of 462 LQTS patients from 7 studies reported that 13% (2.8% rate per year [95% CI 2.0-3.6]) experienced inappropriate shocks, and 26% (7% rate per year [95% CI 4.4-9.7]) experienced ICD-related complications including a 0.6% rate of ICD-related mortality. In addition, the use of ICD therapy carriers a risk for psychological consequences due to fear of being shocked, particularly among patients who have experienced a shock. Once started, beta blockers should not be stopped suddenly; there is a period of high risk after cessation due to up-regulation of beta-receptors on treatment. Certain disorders may be exacerbated by treatment with beta blockers (e.g. asthma, orthostatic hypotension, depression, and diabetes mellitus).
Context: Adult Pediatric
View Citations

Waddell-Smith KE, et al. (2016) PMID: 27262388, M Alders, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1129, Epstein AE, et al. (2013) PMID: 23265327, Al-Khatib SM, et al. (2018) PMID: 29084731, Olde Nordkamp LR, et al. (2016) PMID: 26385533

Chance to Escape Clinical Detection

Given that syncope is often the result of an arrhythmic event in patients with LQTS, early recognition and treatment are needed to avoid recurrences, which could present as cardiac arrest or SCD.
Context: Adult Pediatric
Tier 4 View Citations

Shen WK, et al. (2017) PMID: 28280232

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Gene Condition Associations
OMIM Identifier Primary MONDO Identifier Additional MONDO Identifiers
KCNQ1 192500 0100316 0019171, 0002442
KCNH2 613688 0013367 0019171, 0002442
SCN5A 603830 0011377 0019171, 0002442

References List

Adler A, Sadek MM, Chan AY, Dell E, Rutberg J, Davis D, Green MS, Spears DA, Gollob MH. (2016) Patient Outcomes From a Specialized Inherited Arrhythmia Clinic. Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology. 9(1):e003440.

Ahn J, Kim HJ, Choi JI, Lee KN, Shim J, Ahn HS, Kim YH. (2017) Effectiveness of beta-blockers depending on the genotype of congenital long-QT syndrome: A meta-analysis. PloS one. 12(10):e0185680.

Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ, Bryant WJ, Callans DJ, Curtis AB, Deal BJ, Dickfeld T, Field ME, Fonarow GC, Gillis AM, Granger CB, Hammill SC, Hlatky MA, Joglar JA, Kay GN, Matlock DD, Myerburg RJ, Page RL. (2018) 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death. Circulation. 138(13):e272-e391.

Brignole M, Moya A, de Lange FJ, Deharo JC, Elliott PM, Fanciulli A, Fedorowski A, Furlan R, Kenny RA, Martin A, Probst V, Reed MJ, Rice CP, Sutton R, Ungar A, van Dijk JG. (2018) 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope. European heart journal. 39(21):1883-1948.

Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, Estes NA 3rd, Freedman RA, Gettes LS, Gillinov AM, Gregoratos G, Hammill SC, Hayes DL, Hlatky MA, Newby LK, Page RL, Schoenfeld MH, Silka MJ, Stevenson LW, Sweeney MO, Tracy CM, Epstein AE, Darbar D, DiMarco JP, Dunbar SB, Estes NA 3rd, Ferguson TB Jr, Hammill SC, Karasik PE, Link MS, Marine JE, Schoenfeld MH, Shanker AJ, Silka MJ, Stevenson LW, Stevenson WG, Varosy PD. (2013) 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 61(3):e6-75.

Familial long QT syndrome. Orphanet encyclopedia, http://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=en&Expert=768

Friederich P, Pfitzenmayer H. Anaesthesia recommendations for patients suffering from Long QT syndrome. Orphananesthesia (2014) Accessed: 2019-08-28. URL: https://www.orpha.net/data/patho/Ans/en/Long_QT_EN.pdf

M Alders, I Christiaans. Long QT Syndrome. (2003) [Updated Jun 18 2015]. In: RA Pagon, MP Adam, HH Ardinger, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1129/

Olde Nordkamp LR, Postema PG, Knops RE, van Dijk N, Limpens J, Wilde AA, de Groot JR. (2016) Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator harm in young patients with inherited arrhythmia syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of inappropriate shocks and complications. Heart rhythm. 13(2):443-54.

Priori SG, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, Blom N, Borggrefe M, Camm J, Elliott PM, Fitzsimons D, Hatala R, Hindricks G, Kirchhof P, Kjeldsen K, Kuck KH, Hernandez-Madrid A, Nikolaou N, Norekval TM, Spaulding C, Van Veldhuisen DJ. (2015) 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: The Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 17(11):1601-87.

Priori SG, Schwartz PJ, Napolitano C, Bloise R, Ronchetti E, Grillo M, Vicentini A, Spazzolini C, Nastoli J, Bottelli G, Folli R, Cappelletti D. (2003) Risk stratification in the long-QT syndrome. The New England journal of medicine. 348(19):1866-74.

Romano-Ward syndrome. Orphanet encyclopedia, http://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=en&Expert=101016

Shen WK, Sheldon RS, Benditt DG, Cohen MI, Forman DE, Goldberger ZD, Grubb BP, Hamdan MH, Krahn AD, Link MS, Olshansky B, Raj SR, Sandhu RK, Sorajja D, Sun BC, Yancy CW. (2017) 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 136(5):e25-e59.

Vincent GM, Schwartz PJ, Denjoy I, Swan H, Bithell C, Spazzolini C, Crotti L, Piippo K, Lupoglazoff JM, Villain E, Priori SG, Napolitano C, Zhang L. (2009) High efficacy of beta-blockers in long-QT syndrome type 1: contribution of noncompliance and QT-prolonging drugs to the occurrence of beta-blocker treatment "failures". Circulation. 119(2):215-21.

Waddell-Smith KE, Skinner JR. (2016) Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Familial Long QT Syndrome. Heart, lung & circulation. 25(8):769-76.

Early Rule-Out Summary

This topic passed the early rule out stage

Findings of Early Rule-Out Assessment

  1. Is there a qualifying resource, such as a practice guideline or systematic review, for the genetic condition?
  2. Does the practice guideline or systematic review indicate that the result is actionable in one or more of the following ways?
  3. a. Patient Management

    b. Surveillance or Screening

    c. Circumstances to Avoid

  4. Is there an intervention that is initiated during childhood (<18 years of age) in an undiagnosed child with the genetic condition?
  5. Does the disease present outside of the neonatal period?
  6. Is this condition an important health problem?
  7. Is there at least on known pathogenic variant with at least moderate penetrance (≥40%) or moderate relative risk (≥2) in any population?