Actionability Assertions

Gene Condition (MONDO ID) OMIM ID Final Assertion
BRAF Noonan syndrome 7 (0013379) 613706 Assertion Pending
KRAS Noonan syndrome 3 (0012371) 609942 Assertion Pending
NRAS Noonan syndrome 6 (0013186) 613224 Assertion Pending
PTPN11 Noonan syndrome 1 (0008104) 163950 Assertion Pending
RAF1 Noonan syndrome 5 (0012690) 611553 Assertion Pending
RIT1 Noonan syndrome 8 (0014143) 615355 Assertion Pending
SOS1 Noonan syndrome 4 (0012547) 610733 Assertion Pending
SOS2 Noonan syndrome 9 (0014691) 616559 Assertion Pending

Actionability Assertion Rationale

  • This topic was initially scored prior to development of the process for making actionability assertions. The Pediatric AWG decided to defer making an assertion until after the topic could be reviewed through the update process.

Actionability Scores

Outcome / Intervention Pair Severity Likelihood Effectiveness Nature of Intervention Total Score
Cardiac manifestations / Cardiac surveillance 2 3C 0D 3 8CD
View scoring key
Domain of Actionability Scoring Metric State of the Knowledgebase
Severity: What is the nature of the threat to health to an individual? 3 = Sudden death as a reasonably possible outcome
2 = Reasonable possibility of death or major morbidity
1 = Modest morbidity
0 = Minimal or no morbidity
N/A
Likelihood: What is the chance that the outcome will occur? 3 = >40% chance
2 = 5%-39% chance
1 = 1%-4% chance
0 = <1% chance
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Effectiveness: What is the effectiveness of a specific intervention in preventing or diminishing the risk of harm? 3 = Highly effective
2 = Moderately effective
1 = Minimally effective
0 = Controversial or unknown effectiveness
IN = Ineffective/No interventiona
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Nature of intervention: How risky, medically burdensome, or intensive is the intervention? 3 = Low risk, or medically acceptable and low intensity
2 = Moderate risk, moderately acceptable or intensive
1 = Greater risk, less acceptable and substantial intensity
0 = High risk, poorly acceptable or intensive
N/A
a Do not score the remaining categories

Prevalence of the Genetic Condition

Noonan syndrome (NS) is reported to occur in 1:1000 and 1:2500 live births.
View Citations

JE Allanson, et al. (2001) NCBI: NBK1124, Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176, DYSCERNE - Noonan Syndrome Guideline Development Group. (2010) URL: rasopathiesnet.org., Giacomozzi C, et al. (2015) PMID: 25721697, Allanson JE, et al. (2007) PMID: 17639592

Clinical Features (Signs / symptoms)

NS is characterized by facial dysmorphism, short stature, congenital heart defects, and developmental delay. Cardiac issues include pulmonary valve stenosis (PVS; the most common), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), atrial and ventricular septal defects, branch pulmonary artery stenosis, and tetralogy of Fallot. There is a spectrum of other clinical outcomes associated with NS. Coagulation defects may manifest as severe surgical hemorrhage, clinically mild bruising, or laboratory abnormalities with no clinical consequences. Lymphatic abnormalities may be localized or widespread; dorsal limb lymphedema is the most common. Ocular abnormalities include strabismus, refractive errors, amblyopia, and nystagmus. Hearing loss can be present. Renal abnormalities are generally mild; dilation of the renal pelvis as the most common. Mild intellectual disability and language impairments can be present. Male pubertal development and subsequent fertility may be delayed or inadequate; puberty may be delayed in females, but normal fertility is the rule. Physical findings include broad or webbed neck, chest deformity, cryptorchidism, and bone and joint anomalies. Skin differences include follicular keratosis over extensor surfaces and face, café-au-lait spots, and lentigines. Giant-cell granulomas can occur. There is an increased risk of myeloproliferative disorder (MPD), juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and solid tumors, such as rhabdomyosarcoma and neuroblastoma. Hepatosplenomegaly is frequent; the cause is likely related to subclinical myelodysplasia.
View Citations

JE Allanson, et al. (2001) NCBI: NBK1124, Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176, DYSCERNE - Noonan Syndrome Guideline Development Group. (2010) URL: rasopathiesnet.org., Giacomozzi C, et al. (2015) PMID: 25721697, Allanson JE, et al. (2007) PMID: 17639592, Villani A, et al. (2017) PMID: 28620009, Noonan syndrome. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 648., Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2019) OMIM: 163950, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2011) OMIM: 609942, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2011) OMIM: 613706, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2017) OMIM: 615355, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2016) OMIM: 616559

Natural History (Important subgroups & survival / recovery)

HCM usually presents early in life: the median age at diagnosis is five months and more than 50% of individuals with NS and HCM are diagnosed by age six months. HCM is variable in severity and natural history. The condition resolves in some, but rapidly progresses and may be fatal in others. The severity of NS is the same in males and females. There are no phenotypic features exclusive to a specific genotype; however, there are significant differences in the risk of various NS manifestations based on the causative gene. PTPN11 is associated with a predisposition to JMML, which runs a more benign course in NS compared to the general population. Patients with PTPN11 variants are more likely to have PVS, but less likely to have atrial septal defects and HCM. PTPN11 has also been associated more with short stature, pectus deformity, easy bruising, characteristic facial appearance, and cryptorchidism compared to other causes of NS. SOS1 is associated with more frequent ectodermal abnormalities and PVS and a greater likelihood of normal development and stature compared to other causes of NS and more cardiac septal defects than PTPN11. RAF1 and RIT1 are associated with increased rates of HCM. RIT1 is associated with a high prevalence of perinatal abnormalities, cardiovascular disease, and lymphatic abnormalities but lower prevalence of short stature and intellectual disability. KRAS is associated with greater likelihood and severity of intellectual disability and developmental delays. BRAF is associated with florid ectodermal manifestations.
View Citations

JE Allanson, et al. (2001) NCBI: NBK1124, Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176, DYSCERNE - Noonan Syndrome Guideline Development Group. (2010) URL: rasopathiesnet.org., Giacomozzi C, et al. (2015) PMID: 25721697, Allanson JE, et al. (2007) PMID: 17639592, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2014) OMIM: 610733

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Dominant

Prevalence of Genetic Variants

Unknown
The prevalence of pathogenic variants associated with NS was not available. However, molecular genetic testing identifies a pathogenic variant in PTPN11 in 40-50% of affected individuals; SOS1 in 10-13%; RAF1 and RIT1 each in 5%; KRAS in <5%; and NRAS, BRAF, and SOS2 in <1%.
Tier 3 View Citations

JE Allanson, et al. (2001) NCBI: NBK1124, Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176, Allanson JE, et al. (2007) PMID: 17639592, Villani A, et al. (2017) PMID: 28620009, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2019) OMIM: 176876, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2019) OMIM: 164757

Unknown
Variant testing will provide a diagnosis of NS in 70% of cases; in 30% the responsible gene remains unknown.
Tier 4 View Citations

Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2017) OMIM: 613224

Penetrance (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

>= 40 %
More than 80% of patients with NS have an abnormality of the cardiovascular system. HCM is present in about 20-30% and approximately 50% have an unusual electrocardiographic pattern characterized by left-axis deviation, an abnormal R/S ratio over the left precordial leads, and an abnormal Q wave. The prevalence of these outcomes may vary by gene:

• PTPN11: HCM in 6%, pulmonic stenosis in 71%, and septal defects in 12%

• SOS1: HCM in 12%, pulmonic stenosis in 62%, septal defects in 25%

• RAF1: HCM in 80-95%

• RIT1: HCM in 45-75%.

Tier 3 View Citations

Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176, Allanson JE, et al. (2007) PMID: 17639592, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2019) OMIM: 163950, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2017) OMIM: 615355

Unknown
However, significant bias in the frequency of congenital heart disease may exist because many clinicians have in the past required the presence of cardiac anomalies for diagnosis of NS.
Tier 4 View Citations

JE Allanson, et al. (2001) NCBI: NBK1124

5-39 %
Renal abnormalities are present in 10-11% of individuals with NS.
Tier 3 View Citations

Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176

>= 40 %
About 50% of school-aged children with NS meet diagnostic criteria for a developmental coordination disorder. Up to one fourth of affected individuals have learning disabilities and 10-40% require special education.
Tier 3 View Citations

JE Allanson, et al. (2001) NCBI: NBK1124, Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176

>= 40 %
Approximately 50% to 70% of individuals with NS have short stature.
Tier 3 View Citations

Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176, Giacomozzi C, et al. (2015) PMID: 25721697, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2019) OMIM: 163950

>= 40 %
Cryptorchidism is noted in 60-80% of males with NS.
Tier 4 View Citations

JE Allanson, et al. (2001) NCBI: NBK1124, Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176

>= 40 %
Disordered bleeding has been reported for 30% to 65% of individuals with NS. A variety of small studies have shown that while 50%-89% of those with NS have either a history of bleeding and/or abnormal hemostatic lab results, only 10%-42% have both.
Tier 3 View Citations

JE Allanson, et al. (2001) NCBI: NBK1124, Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176, Allanson JE, et al. (2007) PMID: 17639592

>= 40 %
In a study of 151 subjects with NS, 76% had feeding difficulties, 94% had ocular problems, 50% had hypermobility of joints/hypotonia, 13% had recurrent seizures, 3% had hearing loss, and 3% had peripheral neuropathy.
Tier 3 View Citations

Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176

>= 40 %
Oral findings in patients with NS include a high arched palate (55-100%), dental malocclusion (50–67%), articulation difficulties (72%), and micrognathia (33%–43%).
Tier 3 View Citations

Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176

5-39 %
Lymphatic manifestations are seen in 20% of individuals with NS.
Tier 3 View Citations

Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176, Allanson JE, et al. (2007) PMID: 17639592

5-39 %
Hypothyroidism is described in 5% of individuals with NS, although antimicrosomal thyroid antibodies are more frequently found (38%).
Tier 4 View Citations

Allanson JE, et al. (2007) PMID: 17639592

1-4 %
One study found that of 641 patients with a confirmed germline PTPN11 variant, 16 (2.5%) developed an MPD and 20 (3.1%) developed JMML.
Tier 3 View Citations

Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2019) OMIM: 163950

Relative Risk (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

>3
One study of 571 molecularly confirmed cases of NS reported four cases of JMML, two of brain tumor, one ALL, and one neuroblastoma, and calculated a childhood cancer standardized incidence ratio of 7.9 (95% CI: 3.2-16.2) compared to population-based incidence rates, indicating that individuals with NS are at an almost eightfold greater risk of developing a childhood cancer than those in the general population.
Tier 3 View Citations

JE Allanson, et al. (2001) NCBI: NBK1124, Villani A, et al. (2017) PMID: 28620009

Expressivity

NS has variable expressivity.
Tier 4 View Citations

Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176

Some adults with NS are only ascertained after the birth of their more seriously affected child.
Tier 3 View Citations

Allanson JE, et al. (2007) PMID: 17639592

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Patient Management

At diagnosis, individuals with NS should undergo:

• Cardiac evaluation by a cardiologist, including electrocardiogram and echocardiogram

• Kidney ultrasound

• Coagulation screening with CBC with differential and prothrombin time/activated partial thromboplastin time; repeat after 6-12 months of age if initial screen performed in infancy

• Detailed eye examination

• Hearing test

• Evaluate failure to thrive, growth, and feeding problems

• Developmental, neuropsychological, and behavioral assessment.

Tier 2 View Citations

Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176, DYSCERNE - Noonan Syndrome Guideline Development Group. (2010) URL: rasopathiesnet.org.

At diagnosis of NS, individuals with NS should also undergo:

• Complete physical and neurologic examination

• Clinical and radiographic assessment of spine and rib cage.

Tier 4 View Citations

Allanson JE, et al. (2007) PMID: 17639592

Treatment of complications of NS is generally standard and does not differ from treatment from the general population, including cardiovascular anomalies, developmental delay, cryptorchidism, hearing problems, lymphedema, thyroid abnormalities, and epilepsy.
Tier 2 View Citations

DYSCERNE - Noonan Syndrome Guideline Development Group. (2010) URL: rasopathiesnet.org.

Preoperative evaluation with CBC with differential count, prothrombin time/activated partial thromboplastin time, specific factor activity (factor XI, factor XII, factor IX, factor VIII, von Willebrand factor), and platelet function (bleeding time or platelet aggregation) for bleeding risk should be performed, with hematology consultation as needed for management of bleeding risk.
Tier 2 View Citations

Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176, DYSCERNE - Noonan Syndrome Guideline Development Group. (2010) URL: rasopathiesnet.org.

Potential pregnancy difficulties, for example those arising from coagulation defects during childbirth, should be considered and planned for as appropriate.
Tier 2 View Citations

Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176

A low threshold for investigation of neurological symptoms is recommended (e.g. consider Arnold-Chiari malformation and hydrocephalus if patient presents with headache or other neurological symptoms).
Tier 2 View Citations

DYSCERNE - Noonan Syndrome Guideline Development Group. (2010) URL: rasopathiesnet.org.

Short stature due to NS is an FDA-approved indication for growth hormone (GH) treatment. The rationale for GH treatment of individuals with NS includes: significant short stature compared with normal peers; possible impairment of the GH-insulin-like-growth-factor type I (GH-IGF-I) axis in NS; and documented response to GH treatment in studies.
Tier 3 View Citations

JE Allanson, et al. (2001) NCBI: NBK1124, Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176

No high-quality controlled trails on the use of GH to impact adult height in NS are available. Data from 2 uncontrolled prospective studies that assessed adult height after GH use indicated a standard deviation score of 1.4 ± 0.8, corresponding to 9.5 ± 5.4 cm. Data from 2 uncontrolled prospective studies that assessed near-adult height after GH use indicated a standard deviation score of 1.3 ± 0.9, corresponding to 8.6 ± 5.9 cm. However, the lack of control groups in these studies represents a bias and impacts the interpretation of the effectiveness of GH in NS.
Tier 1 View Citations

Giacomozzi C, et al. (2015) PMID: 25721697

Surveillance

Recommended surveillance in childhood includes:

• Cardiovascular: Individuals without heart disease should have cardiac reevaluation annually until the age of 3, then every 5 years

• Growth: Children should be weighed and measured regularly (three times yearly for first 3 years of life and yearly thereafter) by the primary care provider; data should be plotted on appropriate growth charts

• Development: Developmental screening annually and specifically at primary and secondary school entry

• Vision: Eye evaluations at least every 2 years

• Hearing: Annual hearing test throughout early childhood

• Orthopedics: Annual exam of chest and back to monitor for scoliosis

• Dental: Careful oral exam at each visit

• Coagulation: Screening should be carried out at least once during childhood

• Cryptorchidism: Check for cryptorchidism

• Puberty: The likelihood of delayed puberty should be anticipated

• Thyroid: Screen for thyroid abnormalities every 3-5 years in older children.

Tier 2 View Citations

Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176, DYSCERNE - Noonan Syndrome Guideline Development Group. (2010) URL: rasopathiesnet.org., Elliott PM, et al. (2014) PMID: 25173338

Recommended surveillance in adulthood includes:

• Cardiovascular: Individuals without heart disease should have cardiac reevaluation every 5 years. Adults should not discontinue periodic cardiac evaluations even if their evaluations in childhood or adolescence were normal; unexpected cardiac findings can occur at any point.

• Thyroid: Screen for thyroid abnormalities every 3-5 years

• Fertility: Care providers should be made aware of the increased risk of infertility in males

• Vision: Patients should be referred to an ophthalmologist for assessment

• Dental: Routine follow-up is essential.

Tier 2 View Citations

Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176, DYSCERNE - Noonan Syndrome Guideline Development Group. (2010) URL: rasopathiesnet.org.

To assess for MPD/JMML in patients with NS with certain variants in PTPN11 and KRAS, a physical exam (with assessment of the spleen) and CBC with differential should be performed every 3-6 months from ages 0-5 years. There are no data indicating that this strategy leads to a survival advantage, but the sometimes more aggressive course of MPD and JMML may justify this recommendation in selected patients.
Tier 2 View Citations

Villani A, et al. (2017) PMID: 28620009

Circumstances to Avoid

Aspirin and aspirin-containing medications should be avoided due to a tendency for bleeding.
Tier 2 View Citations

Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176

Due to risk of skin problems, skin dryness, which can be worsened by long hot baths, perfumed soaps and dry atmospheres, should be avoided.
Tier 2 View Citations

DYSCERNE - Noonan Syndrome Guideline Development Group. (2010) URL: rasopathiesnet.org.

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Nature of Intervention

NS is a multisystem disorder that requires various tests, screening, assessments, referrals, and multidisciplinary interventions at different stages of life. Cardiac surveillance is lifelong. Potential treatment includes GH, which has been used without significant adverse events. Among combined 889 patients from 6 articles that reported adult-height outcomes in patients with NS on GH there were only 5 reported cardiac events (2 mild progressions of PVS, 1 HCM, 1 increased biventricular hypertrophy, and 1 cardiac decompensation). No effects on other comorbidities associated with NS have been noted.
Context: Adult Pediatric
View Citations

Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176, DYSCERNE - Noonan Syndrome Guideline Development Group. (2010) URL: rasopathiesnet.org., Giacomozzi C, et al. (2015) PMID: 25721697

Chance to Escape Clinical Detection

There are several disorders with significant phenotypic overlap with NS, such as Turner syndrome. Many adults with NS are only ascertained after the birth of their more seriously affected child.
Context: Adult Pediatric
Tier 3 View Citations

Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176, Allanson JE, et al. (2007) PMID: 17639592

For many years before the understanding of their underlying genetic causes, cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome and Costello syndrome were often confused for NS. Mild expression is likely to be overlooked; many with milder forms escape early detected and are identified later in life. Because of differences in prognosis, recurrence concerns, and treatment, accurate diagnosis is essential.
Context: Adult Pediatric
Tier 4 View Citations

JE Allanson, et al. (2001) NCBI: NBK1124, Romano AA, et al. (2010) PMID: 20876176, Elliott PM, et al. (2014) PMID: 25173338

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Gene Condition Associations
OMIM Identifier Primary MONDO Identifier Additional MONDO Identifiers
BRAF 613706 0013379 0018997
KRAS 609942 0012371 0018997
NRAS 613224 0013186 0018997
PTPN11 163950 0008104 0018997
RAF1 611553 0012690 0018997
RIT1 615355 0014143 0018997
SOS1 610733 0012547 0018997
SOS2 616559 0014691 0018997

References List

Allanson JE. (2007) Noonan syndrome. American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics. 145C(3):274-9.

DYSCERNE - Noonan Syndrome Guideline Development Group. Management of Noonan Syndrome: A Clinical Guideline. Publisher: University of Manchester (2010) URL: https://rasopathiesnet.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/265_Noonan_Guidelines.pdf

Elliott PM, Anastasakis A, Borger MA, Borggrefe M, Cecchi F, Charron P, Hagege AA, Lafont A, Limongelli G, Mahrholdt H, McKenna WJ, Mogensen J, Nihoyannopoulos P, Nistri S, Pieper PG, Pieske B, Rapezzi C, Rutten FH, Tillmanns C, Watkins H. (2014) 2014 ESC Guidelines on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European heart journal. 35(39):2733-79.

Giacomozzi C, Deodati A, Shaikh MG, Ahmed SF, Cianfarani S. (2015) The impact of growth hormone therapy on adult height in noonan syndrome: a systematic review. Hormone research in paediatrics. 83(3):167-76.

JE Allanson, AE Roberts. Noonan Syndrome. (2001) [Updated Aug 08 2019]. In: MP Adam, HH Ardinger, RA Pagon, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1124/

NOONAN SYNDROME 1; NS1. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 163950, (2019) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

NOONAN SYNDROME 3; NS3. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 609942, (2011) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

NOONAN SYNDROME 4; NS4. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 610733, (2014) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

NOONAN SYNDROME 6; NS6. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 613224, (2017) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

NOONAN SYNDROME 7; NS7. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 613706, (2011) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

NOONAN SYNDROME 8; NS8. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 615355, (2017) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

NOONAN SYNDROME 9; NS9. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 616559, (2016) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

PROTEIN-TYROSINE PHOSPHATASE, NONRECEPTOR-TYPE, 11; PTPN11. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 176876, (2019) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

Romano AA, Allanson JE, Dahlgren J, Gelb BD, Hall B, Pierpont ME, Roberts AE, Robinson W, Takemoto CM, Noonan JA. (2010) Noonan syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management guidelines. Pediatrics. 126(4):746-59.

V-RAF MURINE SARCOMA VIRAL ONCOGENE HOMOLOG B1; BRAF. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 164757, (2019) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

Villani A, Greer MC, Kalish JM, Nakagawara A, Nathanson KL, Pajtler KW, Pfister SM, Walsh MF, Wasserman JD, Zelley K, Kratz CP. (2017) Recommendations for Cancer Surveillance in Individuals with RASopathies and Other Rare Genetic Conditions with Increased Cancer Risk. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 23(12):e83-e90.

Early Rule-Out Summary

This topic passed the early rule out stage

Findings of Early Rule-Out Assessment

  1. Is there a qualifying resource, such as a practice guideline or systematic review, for the genetic condition?
  2. Does the practice guideline or systematic review indicate that the result is actionable in one or more of the following ways?
  3. a. Patient Management

    b. Surveillance or Screening

    c. Circumstances to Avoid

  4. Is there an intervention that is initiated during childhood (<18 years of age) in an undiagnosed child with the genetic condition?
  5. Does the disease present outside of the neonatal period?
  6. Is this condition an important health problem?
  7. Is there at least on known pathogenic variant with at least moderate penetrance (≥40%) or moderate relative risk (≥2) in any population?