Actionability Assertions

Gene Condition (MONDO ID) OMIM ID Final Assertion
FGF23 autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets (0008660) 193100 Limited Actionability

Actionability Assertion Rationale

  • All experts agreed with the assertion computed according to the rubric.

Actionability Scores

Outcome / Intervention Pair Severity Likelihood Effectiveness Nature of Intervention Total Score
Morbidity of ADHR (rickets, growth, bone/joint pain) / Oral phosphate plus vitamin D analog supplements 1 0C 0C 2 3CC
View scoring key
Domain of Actionability Scoring Metric State of the Knowledgebase
Severity: What is the nature of the threat to health to an individual? 3 = Sudden death as a reasonably possible outcome
2 = Reasonable possibility of death or major morbidity
1 = Modest morbidity
0 = Minimal or no morbidity
N/A
Likelihood: What is the chance that the outcome will occur? 3 = >40% chance
2 = 5%-39% chance
1 = 1%-4% chance
0 = <1% chance
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Effectiveness: What is the effectiveness of a specific intervention in preventing or diminishing the risk of harm? 3 = Highly effective
2 = Moderately effective
1 = Minimally effective
0 = Controversial or unknown effectiveness
IN = Ineffective/No interventiona
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Nature of intervention: How risky, medically burdensome, or intensive is the intervention? 3 = Low risk, or medically acceptable and low intensity
2 = Moderate risk, moderately acceptable or intensive
1 = Greater risk, less acceptable and substantial intensity
0 = High risk, poorly acceptable or intensive
N/A
a Do not score the remaining categories

Prevalence of the Genetic Condition

The population prevalence of autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets (ADHR) is <1 in 1,000,000. Fewer than 100 cases have been described.
View Citations

Autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 89937.

Clinical Features (Signs / symptoms)

ADHR is caused by mutations in the FGF23 gene which leads to inappropriately high intact FGF23 levels. ADHR is characterized by isolated renal phosphate wasting, hypophosphatemia, rickets and inappropriately low or normal calcitriol levels. During childhood ADHR presents with short stature and rickets affecting primarily lower extremity deformities. During adulthood clinical findings include bone pain, fatigue, muscle weakness, and repeated fractures.
View Citations

Autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 89937., Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2010) OMIM: 193100, Linglart A, et al. (2014) PMID: 24550322

Natural History (Important subgroups & survival / recovery)

Clinical manifestations depend on the age of onset (childhood, adolescence, adulthood) and on the severity of hypophosphatemia. In contrast to other inherited disorders of FGF23 excess (e.g., X-linked hypophosphatemia), ADHR shows incomplete penetrance and variable time of onset in the clinical phenotype. Two subgroups of patients appear to exist within ADHR. Patients may present in childhood with rickets and hypophosphatemia with some patients normalizing serum phosphate spontaneously as they age. A second group, primarily female, appears to grow normally and do not have hypophosphatemia but present in adolescence or adulthood with phosphatemic osteomalacia. These adults with delayed onset can also spontaneously normalize serum phosphate with a resolution of clinical symptoms. The timing and predisposing factors the waxing and waning of symptoms are largely unknown, recent evidence has indicated that changes in iron status may contribute to the changes in phenotype.
View Citations

Autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 89937., Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2010) OMIM: 193100, Econs MJ, et al. (1997) PMID: 9024275, Imel EA, et al. (2011) PMID: 21880793, Kapelari K, et al. (2015) PMID: 26186302

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Dominant
View Citations

Autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 89937., Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2010) OMIM: 193100

Prevalence of Genetic Variants

Unknown
No information on prevalence of pathogenic variants causing ADHR was identified. Fewer than 100 cases have been described.
Tier 4 View Citations

Autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 89937.

Penetrance (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
ADHR exhibits incomplete penetrance. The onset of the features may be delayed and there is occasional resolution of the phosphate-wasting defect.
Tier 3 View Citations

Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2010) OMIM: 193100

Expressivity

Presentation is variable among families even within the same pedigree with patients’ presentations ranging from age 1 to 45 with variable clinical features.
Tier 3 View Citations

Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2010) OMIM: 193100

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Patient Management

Treatment aims at improving growth, bone or joint pain, enhancing mineralization of bones, and preventing skeletal deformities caused by rickets. It consists of daily oral administration of phosphate and calcitriol. Calcitriol is given to prevent secondary hyperparathyroidism that can be caused by phosphate administration.
Tier 4 View Citations

Autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 89937.

There have been case reports of individuals with ADHR presenting during childhood and adolescence/adulthood responding to treatment with phosphate and high doses of vitamin D analogs.
Tier 3 View Citations

Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2010) OMIM: 193100

However, there is some evidence that current treatment strategies may actually increase the production of FGF23. Thus, some authors have suggested the normalization of FGF23 concentration that occurs in some patients is likely due to an intrinsic physiologic alternation in the patient’s metabolism of FGF23, leading to resolution of ADHR features and observed delayed penetrance.
Tier 5 View Citations

Imel EA, et al. (2007) PMID: 17227222

Surveillance

Individuals should undergo frequent monitoring of height, calcium, alkaline phosphatase, parathyroid hormone, and phosphate serum concentrations, as well as urinary calcium and creatinine.
Tier 4 View Citations

Autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 89937.

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Nature of Intervention

In general, prescribing phosphate intake in disorders of phosphate wasting is a balance between excessive dosage tending to hyperparathyroidism and insufficient dosage slowing the healing of rickets. Toxicity from vitamin D analog supplementation may result in hypercalciuria, requiring monitoring of urinary calcium and creatinine. As for many chronic diseases, compliance to oral treatment in phosphate wasting is a major issue, even in expert hands. No specific harms of treatment in ADHR were identified.
Context: Pediatric
View Citations

Linglart A, et al. (2014) PMID: 24550322

Chance to Escape Clinical Detection

Patients may have a delayed onset of phenotype and may display features that are not seen in other hereditary phosphaturic disorders, this may lead to difficulties in establishing the presence of the disorder.
Context: Pediatric
Tier 3 View Citations

Econs MJ, et al. (1997) PMID: 9024275

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Gene Condition Associations
OMIM Identifier Primary MONDO Identifier Additional MONDO Identifiers
FGF23 193100 0008660

References List

Autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets. Orphanet encyclopedia, http://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=en&Expert=89937

Econs MJ, McEnery PT. (1997) Autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets/osteomalacia: clinical characterization of a novel renal phosphate-wasting disorder. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 82(2):674-81.

HYPOPHOSPHATEMIC RICKETS, AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT; ADHR. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 193100, (2010) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

Imel EA, Hui SL, Econs MJ. (2007) FGF23 concentrations vary with disease status in autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets. Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 22(4):520-6.

Imel EA, Peacock M, Gray AK, Padgett LR, Hui SL, Econs MJ. (2011) Iron modifies plasma FGF23 differently in autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets and healthy humans. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 96(11):3541-9.

Kapelari K, Kohle J, Kotzot D, Hogler W. (2015) Iron Supplementation Associated With Loss of Phenotype in Autosomal Dominant Hypophosphatemic Rickets. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 100(9):3388-92.

Linglart A, Biosse-Duplan M, Briot K, Chaussain C, Esterle L, Guillaume-Czitrom S, Kamenicky P, Nevoux J, Prie D, Rothenbuhler A, Wicart P, Harvengt P. (2014) Therapeutic management of hypophosphatemic rickets from infancy to adulthood. Endocrine connections. 3(1):R13-30.

Early Rule-Out Summary

This topic passed the early rule out stage

Findings of Early Rule-Out Assessment

  1. Is there a qualifying resource, such as a practice guideline or systematic review, for the genetic condition?
  2. Does the practice guideline or systematic review indicate that the result is actionable in one or more of the following ways?
  3. a. Patient Management

    b. Surveillance or Screening

    c. Circumstances to Avoid

  4. Is there an intervention that is initiated during childhood (<18 years of age) in an undiagnosed child with the genetic condition?
  5. Does the disease present outside of the neonatal period?
  6. Is this condition an important health problem?
  7. Is there at least on known pathogenic variant with at least moderate penetrance (≥40%) or moderate relative risk (≥2) in any population?