Actionability Assertions

Gene Condition (MONDO ID) OMIM ID Final Assertion
ALDOB N/A (MONDO:0009249) 229600 Assertion Pending

Actionability Assertion Rationale

  • This topic was initially scored prior to development of the process for making actionability assertions. The Actionability Working Group decided to defer making an assertion until after the topic could be reviewed through the update process.

Actionability Scores

Outcome / Intervention Pair Severity Likelihood Effectiveness Nature of Intervention Total Score
Morbidity associated with hereditary fructose intolerance / Dietary restriction of fructose, sucrose, and sorbitol 2 3N 3C 2 10NC
Organ failure from acute exposure to fructose, sucrose, and sorbitol / Avoidance of iatrogenic or acute exposure to fructose, sucrose, and sorbitol 2 0N 3C 3 8NC
View scoring key
Domain of Actionability Scoring Metric State of the Knowledgebase
Severity: What is the nature of the threat to health to an individual? 3 = Sudden death as a reasonably possible outcome
2 = Reasonable possibility of death or major morbidity
1 = Modest morbidity
0 = Minimal or no morbidity
N/A
Likelihood: What is the chance that the outcome will occur? 3 = >40% chance
2 = 5%-39% chance
1 = 1%-4% chance
0 = <1% chance
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Effectiveness: What is the effectiveness of a specific intervention in preventing or diminishing the risk of harm? 3 = Highly effective
2 = Moderately effective
1 = Minimally effective
0 = Controversial or unknown effectiveness
IN = Ineffective/No interventiona
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Nature of intervention: How risky, medically burdensome, or intensive is the intervention? 3 = Low risk, or medically acceptable and low intensity
2 = Moderate risk, moderately acceptable or intensive
1 = Greater risk, less acceptable and substantial intensity
0 = High risk, poorly acceptable or intensive
N/A
a Do not score the remaining categories

Prevalence of the Genetic Condition

The prevalence of hereditary fructose intolerance (HFI) has been extrapolated based on carrier frequencies of pathogenic variants to be approximately 1:18,000 – 1:34,000 in Europe and in multiple populations in the United States (All – 1:60,000; self-identified Middle Eastern – 1:38,000; self-identified African American – 1:205,000).
View Citations

P Baker, et al. (2015) NCBI: NBK333439, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2016) OMIM: 229600, Hereditary fructose intolerance. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 469.

Clinical Features (Signs / symptoms)

HFI is associated with an inability to metabolize fructose completely in the liver, intestine and kidneys. Clinical symptoms of HFI include gastrointestinal distress (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, anorexia), jaundice, bleeding tendency, renal tubular dysfunction and metabolic disturbances following dietary exposure to fructose, sucrose, or sorbitol. If large quantities of fructose are ingested, the patient may acutely develop lethargy, seizures, and/or progressive coma. Persistent fructose exposure can result in chronic growth restriction, failure to thrive, renal and hepatic failure, and risk of death.
View Citations

P Baker, et al. (2015) NCBI: NBK333439, Hereditary fructose intolerance. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 469.

Natural History (Important subgroups & survival / recovery)

Symptoms of HFI become apparent during infancy at the time of weaning, when fructose or sucrose is introduced into the diet. Of note, some individuals have survived and been diagnosed in adulthood due to aversion to fructose-containing foods and a self-imposed fructose-free diet refined through trial and error. If identified and treated before permanent organ injury occurs, individuals with HFI have a normal life expectancy. Hepatomegaly may remain a persistent complication despite fructose restriction and resolution of initial hepatic fibrosis.
View Citations

P Baker, et al. (2015) NCBI: NBK333439, Hereditary fructose intolerance. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 469.

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Recessive
View Citations

P Baker, et al. (2015) NCBI: NBK333439, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2016) OMIM: 229600, Hereditary fructose intolerance. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 469.

Prevalence of Genetic Variants

1-2 in 500
In a large carrier screening study of multiple disorders in an ethnically diverse population in the United States, overall carrier frequency for an ALDOB pathogenic variant was 1:122 (~0.8%). Carrier frequency in persons self-identifying as Middle Eastern (n=388) was 1:97 (~1.0%) while the frequency for self-identifying African American population (n=678) was 1:226 (~0.4%), although these data may underestimate the prevalence in persons of non-European ancestry based on the variants examined. Carrier frequencies estimates in European countries have ranged from 0.8-1.3%.
Tier 3 View Citations

P Baker, et al. (2015) NCBI: NBK333439, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2016) OMIM: 229600

Penetrance (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
No information on penetrance among individuals identified molecularly was found.
Tier Not provided
>= 40 %
The following clinical features were found at presentation in a case series of 50 patients with symptomatic HFI in childhood:

• Vomiting - 50/50 (100%)

• Hepatomegaly - 50/50 (100%)

• Anorexia - 27/50 (54%)

• Weight retardation - 23/49 (47%)

• Bleeding tendency - 23/50 (46%)

• Jaundice - 19/50 (38%)

• Edema and /or ascites - 15/50 (30%)

• Height retardation - 15/49 (31%)

• Aversion to sweet foods - 13/50 (26%)

• Shock, seizures - 8/50 (16%)

Tier 5 View Citations

Odievre M, et al. (1978) PMID: 655145

Relative Risk (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
No information on the relative risk was identified.

Expressivity

No genotype-phenotype correlations have been identified for HFI; clinical severity and extent of organ damage appear to depend on an individual's nutritional environment. However, it has been suggested that tolerance of dietary fructose probably depends on an individual's residual enzyme activity.
Tier 4 View Citations

P Baker, et al. (2015) NCBI: NBK333439

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Patient Management

Dietary restriction of fructose, sucrose, and sorbitol is the cornerstone of HFI treatment (see circumstances to avoid).
To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with HFI, evaluation by the following specialists is recommended:

• Biochemical geneticist or pediatrician with an interest in metabolic disorders

• Dietician with experience in managing inherited metabolic diseases

• Hepatologist

• Nephrologist

Tier 4 View Citations

P Baker, et al. (2015) NCBI: NBK333439

Daily supplementation with a sugar-free multivitamin is recommended to prevent micronutrient deficiencies, specifically the water-soluble vitamins such as vitamin C and folates, in the setting of reduced fruit and vegetable intake.
Tier 4 View Citations

P Baker, et al. (2015) NCBI: NBK333439

Acute presentations should be managed symptomatically in a hospital setting, including intravenous glucose (dextrose) administration, supportive treatment of hepatic insufficiency (including fresh frozen plasma or exchange transfusion), and treatment of metabolic acidosis, if present.
Tier 4 View Citations

P Baker, et al. (2015) NCBI: NBK333439

During any hospitalization, great care should be taken to avoid enteral or parenteral exposure to fructose, sorbitol, sucrose, sucralose, and polysorbate. Of particular note, a 24% sucrose solution (routinely administered to hospitalized neonates for minor procedures) should not be given to neonates known to have HFI. This recommendation is supported by case reports of reported accidental and iatrogenic fructose infusion-related serious organ failure events and/or deaths.
Tier 3 View Citations

P Baker, et al. (2015) NCBI: NBK333439

Alerts should be placed in the patient's chart or medical record to notify practitioners to the HFI diagnosis and to the medical risks associated with exposures to fructose and related metabolites. The patient is advised to wear at all times a medically approved alert bracelet/necklace that provides information about the diagnosis of HFI. Hospital pharmacists should be utilized or parenteral medications, which should be cleared for use on a case-by-case basis.
Tier 4 View Citations

P Baker, et al. (2015) NCBI: NBK333439

Surveillance

No information on surveillance was identified.

Circumstances to Avoid

Dietary restriction of fructose, sucrose, and sorbitol is necessary for the management of HFI, and should be strictly followed and maintained, especially during infancy. Currently, there are no specific guidelines regarding dietary fructose limits in any age group. In addition, HFI patients should avoid medicines and formulas in which fructose/sucrose may not be listed as a primary component but may be present (high risk concoctions include: syrups, enema solutions, some immunoglobulin solutions, and many infant and pediatric nutritional drinks). Evidence from 50 patients presenting with confirmed and symptomatic HFI shows that upon dietary restriction of fructose, the improvement observed is dramatic: vomiting and gastrointestinal symptoms resolved nearly immediately, bleeding tendency resolves in ~24 hours, renal tubular dysfunction can resolve in as little as 3 days, and clinical and biological findings, with the exception of hepatomegaly, resolved within a few weeks. Normal growth occurred in 2-3 years. In the 50 symptomatic patients and 5 patients who received treatment from birth, liver enlargement persisted in spite of treatment and resolution of fibrosis.
Tier 3 View Citations

P Baker, et al. (2015) NCBI: NBK333439

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Nature of Intervention

The primary intervention for HFI is lifelong avoidance of enteral or parenteral exposure to fructose, sorbitol, sucrose, sucralose, and polysorbate.
Context: Pediatric
View Citations

P Baker, et al. (2015) NCBI: NBK333439

Chance to Escape Clinical Detection

The diagnosis of HFI may be made in an older individual who has, through a natural aversion to fruits and sweets, avoided fructose-containing food since childhood. A number of reported accidental and iatrogenic fructose infusion-related deaths have been reported in patients with undiagnosed or inadequately disclosed HFI.
Context: Pediatric
Tier 3 View Citations

P Baker, et al. (2015) NCBI: NBK333439

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Gene Condition Associations
OMIM Identifier Primary MONDO Identifier Additional MONDO Identifiers
ALDOB 229600 MONDO:0009249

References List

FRUCTOSE INTOLERANCE, HEREDITARY. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 229600, (2016) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

Hereditary fructose intolerance. Orphanet encyclopedia, http://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=en&Expert=469

Odievre M, Gentil C, Gautier M, Alagille D. (1978) Hereditary fructose intolerance in childhood. Diagnosis, management, and course in 55 patients. American journal of diseases of children (1960). 132(6):605-8.

P Baker, L Ayres, S Gaughan, J Weisfeld-Adams. Hereditary Fructose Intolerance. (2015) . In: MP Adam, HH Ardinger, RA Pagon, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK333439/

Early Rule-Out Summary

This topic passed the early rule out stage

Findings of Early Rule-Out Assessment

  1. Is there a qualifying resource, such as a practice guideline or systematic review, for the genetic condition?
  2. Does the practice guideline or systematic review indicate that the result is actionable in one or more of the following ways?
  3. a. Patient Management

    b. Surveillance or Screening

    c. Circumstances to Avoid

  4. Is there an intervention that is initiated during childhood (<18 years of age) in an undiagnosed child with the genetic condition?
  5. Does the disease present outside of the neonatal period?
  6. Is this condition an important health problem?
  7. Is there at least on known pathogenic variant with at least moderate penetrance (≥40%) or moderate relative risk (≥2) in any population?