Actionability Assertions

Gene Condition (MONDO ID) OMIM ID Final Assertion
SLC39A4 acrodermatitis enteropathica (0008713) 201100 Strong Actionability

Actionability Assertion Rationale

  • All experts agreed with the assertion computed according to the rubric.

Actionability Scores

Outcome / Intervention Pair Severity Likelihood Effectiveness Nature of Intervention Total Score
Morbidity and mortality associated with zinc deficiency / Zinc supplementation 2 3C 3C 3 11CC
View scoring key
Domain of Actionability Scoring Metric State of the Knowledgebase
Severity: What is the nature of the threat to health to an individual? 3 = Sudden death as a reasonably possible outcome
2 = Reasonable possibility of death or major morbidity
1 = Modest morbidity
0 = Minimal or no morbidity
N/A
Likelihood: What is the chance that the outcome will occur? 3 = >40% chance
2 = 5%-39% chance
1 = 1%-4% chance
0 = <1% chance
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Effectiveness: What is the effectiveness of a specific intervention in preventing or diminishing the risk of harm? 3 = Highly effective
2 = Moderately effective
1 = Minimally effective
0 = Controversial or unknown effectiveness
IN = Ineffective/No interventiona
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Nature of intervention: How risky, medically burdensome, or intensive is the intervention? 3 = Low risk, or medically acceptable and low intensity
2 = Moderate risk, moderately acceptable or intensive
1 = Greater risk, less acceptable and substantial intensity
0 = High risk, poorly acceptable or intensive
N/A
a Do not score the remaining categories

Prevalence of the Genetic Condition

The only data available suggests an incidence of 1:500,000 births in Denmark. The condition appears to be more common in the North-West of Tunisia, sub-Saharan Africa, and South East Asia.
View Citations

Kury S, et al. (2016) PMID: 26443269, Acrodermatitis enteropathica. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 37., Kharfi M, et al. (2010) PMID: 20883266

Clinical Features (Signs / symptoms)

Acrodermatitis enteropathica (AEZ) is characterized by zinc malabsorption due to pathogenic variants in SLC39A4, a gene encoding a zinc transporter. Patients have low plasma zinc concentrations, and low levels of serum alkaline phosphatase. AEZ initially manifests as skin lesions. These typically are eczematous pink scaly plaques that can become pustular, vesiculobullous, psoriasisform, or crusted, appearing in the acral, periorificial, and anogenital areas. If treatment is not initiated, they may evolve into erosions and are susceptible to secondary infection. Other observed manifestations include diarrhea, generalized alopecia, Beau-Reil nail lines, paronychia, conjunctivitis, blepharitis, and erythematous oral mucous membranes. Prolonged zinc deficiency leads to failure to thrive, mental slowness, photophobia, hypogeusia, anemia, poor wound healing, hypogonadism (males), and delayed puberty.
View Citations

Kury S, et al. (2016) PMID: 26443269, Acrodermatitis enteropathica. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 37., Kharfi M, et al. (2010) PMID: 20883266, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2016) OMIM: 201100, Van Wouwe JP, et al. (1989) PMID: 2691254

Natural History (Important subgroups & survival / recovery)

AEZ usually presents in the first 4-10 weeks of life in infants that are not breast-fed, and around the time of weaning in breast-fed infants. However, there are case reports of breast-fed infants with earlier onset due to the heterozygous status of the mother and thus likely reduced zinc content in the breast milk. Left untreated, AEZ results in generalized organic failure and death prior to adulthood, with most reported deaths occurring before age 12.
View Citations

Kury S, et al. (2016) PMID: 26443269, Acrodermatitis enteropathica. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 37., Kharfi M, et al. (2010) PMID: 20883266, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2016) OMIM: 201100, Van Wouwe JP, et al. (1989) PMID: 2691254

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Recessive
View Citations

Kury S, et al. (2016) PMID: 26443269, Acrodermatitis enteropathica. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 37., Kharfi M, et al. (2010) PMID: 20883266

Prevalence of Genetic Variants

Unknown
No information on prevalence of pathogenic variants in SLC39A4 was identified.

Penetrance (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
The risk to develop AEZ is 100% in homozygotes or compound heterozygotes, though it may be masked by breast milk consumption.
Tier 4 View Citations

Kury S, et al. (2016) PMID: 26443269

>= 40 %
In a large historical review of case reports (n = 179) of AEZ, most of which were not confirmed to meet clinical criteria for hereditary disease on the basis of zinc therapy withdrawal, 34 out of 51 untreated patients experienced a lethal outcome.
Tier 3 View Citations

Kury S, et al. (2016) PMID: 26443269

>= 40 %
In a case series of 29 patients meeting clinical criteria (relapse after withdrawal of zinc) for hereditary AEZ, the following clinical signs were reported at initial consult:

-Mucosal signs: 19/29 (66%)

-Phanere affections (complete alopecia of the scalp, eyelashes, and eyebrows): 15/29 (52%)

-Diarrhea: 15/29 (52%)

-Neuropsychiatric disorders: 13/29 (45%)
Tier 3 View Citations

Kury S, et al. (2016) PMID: 26443269

Expressivity

No genotype-phenotype correlations have been observed.
Tier 3 View Citations

Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2016) OMIM: 201100

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Patient Management

AEZ patients require lifelong oral zinc supplementation. Any interruption of the therapy will inevitably induce a relapse. However, with adherence to lifelong zinc supplementation, prognosis is good with resolution of symptoms in days or weeks.
Tier 3 View Citations

Kury S, et al. (2016) PMID: 26443269

In a case series of 29 AEZ patients diagnosed based on clinical criteria (mean age of onset 6.9 months; genotypic confirmation in 13 patients), 26 were treated with zinc sulfate and 3 with zinc gluconate at a dose of 5-10 mg/kg/d. In all cases, the changes were quick and positive with complete healing of the cutaneous lesions within three weeks. The monitoring period ranged from 7 to 24 years for 26 of these patients. No patients experienced any growth failure or intellectual delay. The other three patients were lost to follow-up (n = 2) or died after irregular treatment and onset of infection (n = 1). No growth failure or intellectual delay was observed after treatment. In one patient where treatment was repeatedly interrupted, 5 separate relapses were induced. Three patients had relapses during adolescence, despite regular treatment, and required higher doses. In a large historical review of case reports (n = 179) of AEZ, most of which were not confirmed to meet clinical criteria for hereditary disease on the basis of zinc therapy withdrawal, 34 out of 51 untreated patients experienced a lethal outcome, whereas only 2 of 128 patients who were treated with zinc therapy experienced a lethal outcome.
Tier 5 View Citations

Kharfi M, et al. (2010) PMID: 20883266, Van Wouwe JP, et al. (1989) PMID: 2691254

Surveillance

Zinc and copper levels should be monitored regularly. Regular clinical and biological follow-up of the patients enables adaptation of the dose of zinc supplement to possible physiological (e.g., adolescence, pregnancy), or pathological (e.g., inflammatory states) variations in zinc levels.
Tier 4 View Citations

Kury S, et al. (2016) PMID: 26443269, Acrodermatitis enteropathica. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 37.

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Nature of Intervention

Treatment includes oral zinc supplementation. In a case series following 26 AEZ patients from 7 to 24 years (13 patients followed more than 10 years), treatment with zinc sulfate or zinc gluconate was well-tolerated with no reported side effects.
Context: Pediatric
View Citations

Kharfi M, et al. (2010) PMID: 20883266

Chance to Escape Clinical Detection

Establishing a diagnosis of AEZ is not very easy because of the rarity of the disease, which often leads to a long diagnostic delay. Clinical and biochemical diagnostic methods are rarely sufficient to establish a definitive diagnosis, because acquired zinc deficiency causes are varied and not always obvious to determine.
Context: Pediatric
Tier 4 View Citations

Kury S, et al. (2016) PMID: 26443269

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Gene Condition Associations
OMIM Identifier Primary MONDO Identifier Additional MONDO Identifiers
SLC39A4 201100 0008713

References List

ACRODERMATITIS ENTEROPATHICA, ZINC-DEFICIENCY TYPE; AEZ. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 201100, (2016) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

Acrodermatitis enteropathica. Orphanet encyclopedia, http://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=en&Expert=37

Kharfi M, El Fekih N, Aounallah-Skhiri H, Schmitt S, Fazaa B, Kury S, Kamoun MR. (2010) Acrodermatitis enteropathica: a review of 29 Tunisian cases. International journal of dermatology. 49(9):1038-44.

Kury S, Kharfi M, Blouin E, Schmitt S, Bezieau S. (2016) Clinical utility gene card for: acrodermatitis enteropathica - update 2015. European journal of human genetics : EJHG. 24(5).

Van Wouwe JP. (1989) Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of acrodermatitis enteropathica. European journal of pediatrics. 149(1):2-8.

Early Rule-Out Summary

This topic passed the early rule out stage

Findings of Early Rule-Out Assessment

  1. Is there a qualifying resource, such as a practice guideline or systematic review, for the genetic condition?
  2. Does the practice guideline or systematic review indicate that the result is actionable in one or more of the following ways?
  3. a. Patient Management

    b. Surveillance or Screening

    c. Circumstances to Avoid

  4. Is there an intervention that is initiated during childhood (<18 years of age) in an undiagnosed child with the genetic condition?
  5. Does the disease present outside of the neonatal period?
  6. Is this condition an important health problem?
  7. Is there at least on known pathogenic variant with at least moderate penetrance (≥40%) or moderate relative risk (≥2) in any population?