Actionability Assertions

Gene Condition (MONDO ID) OMIM ID Final Assertion
CYP21A2 N/A (0023601) 201910 Limited Actionability

Actionability Assertion Rationale

  • All experts agreed with the assertion computed according to the rubric.

Actionability Scores

Outcome / Intervention Pair Severity Likelihood Effectiveness Nature of Intervention Total Score
Infertility/subfertility in females / Glucocorticoid therapy 1 3C 1B 2 7CB
View scoring key
Domain of Actionability Scoring Metric State of the Knowledgebase
Severity: What is the nature of the threat to health to an individual? 3 = Sudden death as a reasonably possible outcome
2 = Reasonable possibility of death or major morbidity
1 = Modest morbidity
0 = Minimal or no morbidity
N/A
Likelihood: What is the chance that the outcome will occur? 3 = >40% chance
2 = 5%-39% chance
1 = 1%-4% chance
0 = <1% chance
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Effectiveness: What is the effectiveness of a specific intervention in preventing or diminishing the risk of harm? 3 = Highly effective
2 = Moderately effective
1 = Minimally effective
0 = Controversial or unknown effectiveness
IN = Ineffective/No interventiona
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Nature of intervention: How risky, medically burdensome, or intensive is the intervention? 3 = Low risk, or medically acceptable and low intensity
2 = Moderate risk, moderately acceptable or intensive
1 = Greater risk, less acceptable and substantial intensity
0 = High risk, poorly acceptable or intensive
N/A
a Do not score the remaining categories

Prevalence of the Genetic Condition

Hyperandrogenism is estimated to affect approximately 10% of the female population. Among these women, the prevalence of non-classic congenital hyperplasia (NCCAH) due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency is estimated to range between 1-10% depending on the ethnicity, with a worldwide estimate of 4.2% of hyperandrogenic women. While it is expected that NCCAH would occur equally in men and women, only a few case reports and small series have been reported in men.
View Citations

Carmina E, et al. (2017) PMID: 28582566

Clinical Features (Signs / symptoms)

In NCCAH there is mild deficiency (30-50%) of the activity of the 21-hydroxylase enzyme resulting in androgen excess. These individuals have postnatal onset with signs of hyperandrogenism.Females are not virilized at birth (as in the classic form), though postnatal virilization can occur. Symptoms of androgen excess may include acne, premature development of pubic hair, accelerated growth, advanced bone age, and reduced adult stature due to premature epiphyseal fusion. Other symptoms in females can include hirsutism, frontal baldness, delayed menarche, ovulatory and menstrual dysfunction, and infertility. Polycystic ovarian morphology is a frequent finding in females with NCCAH. Most women with NCCAH will conceive spontaneously; however, between 10-30% of NCCAH women or reproductive age complain of infertility or subfertility, mainly due to anovulation. Affected adult females are more likely to have gender dysphoria, experience less heterosexual interest, and reduced satisfaction with the assignment to the female sex. Data regarding adult males with NCCAH are extremely limited, therefore it appears that the great majority of male patients are asymptomatic with most identified during genetic screening. Males with NCCAH may have early beard growth, gynecomastia, and an enlarged phallus with relatively small testes. Typically, men have normal sperm counts and do not have impaired gonad function. Testicular adrenal rest tumors are quite uncommon but may occur. Males do not show a general alteration in gender identity or sexual orientation. There is limited data to suggest an association with adrenal hyperplasia and adenoma, insulin resistance, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and exercise intolerance, and cardiovascular events with both classic CAH and NCCAH.
View Citations

Carmina E, et al. (2017) PMID: 28582566, Speiser PW, et al. (2010) PMID: 20823466, S Nimkarn, et al. (2002) NCBI: NBK1171, Congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 418., Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2016) OMIM: 201910

Natural History (Important subgroups & survival / recovery)

NCCAH may present any time postnatally. Most children with NCCAH are asymptomatic in the prepubertal years with premature pubarche, menstrual irregularities (females), and gynecomastia (males) often occurring as the first presentation. Women who present with NCCAH symptoms as adults typically present with hirsutism, acne, androgenic alopecia, and/or clitoromegaly.
View Citations

Carmina E, et al. (2017) PMID: 28582566, Speiser PW, et al. (2010) PMID: 20823466, S Nimkarn, et al. (2002) NCBI: NBK1171, Congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 418.

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Recessive

Prevalence of Genetic Variants

>1-2 in 100
The vast majority of NCCAH patients seeking medical attention are associated with CYP21A2 pathogenic variants. As such, it can be estimated that the prevalence of CYP21A2 variants resulting in NCCAH is near the population prevalence of the disease cited above.
Tier 3 View Citations

Carmina E, et al. (2017) PMID: 28582566

Penetrance (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
Adult Women:

-Overt ovulatory and menstrual dysfunction: 30-50%

-Polycystic ovarian morphology: 24-44%

-Infertility: 10-30%

-Subfertility: ~50%

-Spontaneous miscarriage: 25% of pregnancies

-Hirsutism: 60-80%

-Acne: ~33%

-Clitoromegaly: 6-20%

-Alopecia: 2-8%Adult Men:

-Testicular adrenal rest tumors: Unknown; rare
Tier 3 View Citations

Carmina E, et al. (2017) PMID: 28582566, Speiser PW, et al. (2010) PMID: 20823466

Expressivity

Because many patients are compound heterozygotes for two or more different mutant CYP21A2 alleles with varying impacts on enzyme function, a wide spectrum of phenotypes may be observed.
Tier 3 View Citations

Speiser PW, et al. (2010) PMID: 20823466

The NCCAH phenotype may be highly variable even with a family sharing the same CYP21A2 genotype.
Tier 3 View Citations

Carmina E, et al. (2017) PMID: 28582566

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Patient Management

The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) has developed an ACT sheet algorithm to help clinical decision-making following newborn screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia (Elevated 17-OHP): https://www.acmg.net/PDFLibrary/Elevated-17-OHP-Algorithm.pdf
Treatment is suggested for NCCAH only in adults with patient-important hyperandrogenism with the option of discontinuing treatment once symptoms resolve.
Tier 2 View Citations

Carmina E, et al. (2017) PMID: 28582566, Speiser PW, et al. (2010) PMID: 20823466, Clayton PE, et al. (2002) PMID: 12324718

In adult women with NCCAH, ovarian androgen suppression or peripheral androgen blockade are more effective than glucocorticoids for reducing circulating androgens and their effects. One controlled randomized trial on a series of 30 patients compared the effectiveness of cyproterone acetate (CPA) versus hydrocortisone. Based on the hirsutism score, CPA was more effective than hydrocortisone (hirsutism improved in 54% and 24% patients, respectively). In another randomized trial including 28 patients, CPA associated with ethinylestradiol was found to be superior to dexamethasone (hirsutism improved in 66% and 31% patients, respectively).
Tier 2 View Citations

Carmina E, et al. (2017) PMID: 28582566

Women should be counseled regarding an increased risk of infertility. Treatment is suggested in adults with NCCAH with patient-important infertility. Adult women with NCCAH who have not conceived spontaneously and who demonstrate overt or subclinical ovulatory dysfunction may benefit from glucocorticoids or from ovulation induction. In a recent study of 38 patients who presented with oligo-amenorrhea before treatment, 27 achieved regular menstrual cycles with hydrocortisone treatment (average dose: 17.5 ± 7.5mg/day). Among the 11 patients presenting with amenorrhea before treatment, only three still had amenorrhea after glucocorticoid-only treatment. Plasma testosterone and androstenedione concentrations decreased significantly in all patients. In one study the rate of singleton live birth was higher in NCCAH women diagnosed and treated for their disorder prior to conceiving that in those patients who conceived spontaneously (86% versus 69%); there were no difference in the rate of ectopic pregnancy, preterm birth, stillbirths, twins or multiple pregnancies. Evidence is mixed regarding the continuation of glucocorticoid treatment during pregnancy to potentially reduce pregnancy loss and there are no clear guidelines concerning treatment during pregnancy.
Tier 2 View Citations

Carmina E, et al. (2017) PMID: 28582566, Speiser PW, et al. (2010) PMID: 20823466, Clayton PE, et al. (2002) PMID: 12324718

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Nature of Intervention

Glucocorticoid overtreatment may cause Cushing syndrome. As such, glucocorticoids are recommended in only a subset of patients with NCCAH and require monitoring.
Context: Adult
View Citations

Speiser PW, et al. (2010) PMID: 20823466

Chance to Escape Clinical Detection

NCCAH is often not diagnosed until adolescence when the first symptoms appear. Reduced fertility may be the only symptom of disease.
Context: Adult
Tier 4 View Citations

Congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 418.

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Gene Condition Associations
OMIM Identifier Primary MONDO Identifier Additional MONDO Identifiers
CYP21A2 201910 0023601

References List

ADRENAL HYPERPLASIA, CONGENITAL, DUE TO 21-HYDROXYLASE DEFICIENCY. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 201910, (2016) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

Carmina E, Dewailly D, Escobar-Morreale HF, Kelestimur F, Moran C, Oberfield S, Witchel SF, Azziz R. (2017) Non-classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency revisited: an update with a special focus on adolescent and adult women. Human reproduction update. 23(5):580-599.

Clayton PE, Miller WL, Oberfield SE, Ritzen EM, Sippell WG, Speiser PW. (2002) Consensus statement on 21-hydroxylase deficiency from the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and the Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society. Hormone research. 58(4):188-95.

Congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Orphanet encyclopedia, http://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=en&Expert=418

S Nimkarn, PK Gangishetti, M Yau, MI New. 21-Hydroxylase-Deficient Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. (2002) [Updated Feb 04 2016]. In: MP Adam, HH Ardinger, RA Pagon, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1171/

Speiser PW, Azziz R, Baskin LS, Ghizzoni L, Hensle TW, Merke DP, Meyer-Bahlburg HF, Miller WL, Montori VM, Oberfield SE, Ritzen M, White PC. (2010) Congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to steroid 21-hydroxylase deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 95(9):4133-60.

Early Rule-Out Summary

This topic did not pass the early rule out stage due to insufficient evidence for actionability. However, the Actionability Working Group discussed and granted an exception to move this topic forward for a full evidence curation and summary report.

Findings of Early Rule-Out Assessment

  1. Is there a qualifying resource, such as a practice guideline or systematic review, for the genetic condition?
  2. Does the practice guideline or systematic review indicate that the result is actionable in one or more of the following ways?
  3. a. Patient Management

    b. Surveillance or Screening

    c. Circumstances to Avoid

  4. Is it actionable in an undiagnosed adult with the condition?
  5. Is this condition an important health problem?
  6. Is there at least on known pathogenic variant with at least moderate penetrance (≥40%) or moderate relative risk (≥2) in any population?