Actionability Assertions

Gene Condition (MONDO ID) OMIM ID Final Assertion
DNM2 Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate B (0011674) 606482 Assertion Pending

Actionability Assertion Rationale

  • This topic was initially scored prior to development of the process for making actionability assertions. The Actionability Working Group decided to defer making an assertion until after the topic could be reviewed through the update process.

Actionability Scores

Outcome / Intervention Pair Severity Likelihood Effectiveness Nature of Intervention Total Score
Demyelinating peripheral neuropathy / Regular medical evaluations 1 3C IN Not Scored IN
Demyelinating peripheral neuropathy / Avoidance of vincristine, paclitaxel, succinylcholine 1 3C 3C 2 9CC
View scoring key
Domain of Actionability Scoring Metric State of the Knowledgebase
Severity: What is the nature of the threat to health to an individual? 3 = Sudden death as a reasonably possible outcome
2 = Reasonable possibility of death or major morbidity
1 = Modest morbidity
0 = Minimal or no morbidity
N/A
Likelihood: What is the chance that the outcome will occur? 3 = >40% chance
2 = 5%-39% chance
1 = 1%-4% chance
0 = <1% chance
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Effectiveness: What is the effectiveness of a specific intervention in preventing or diminishing the risk of harm? 3 = Highly effective
2 = Moderately effective
1 = Minimally effective
0 = Controversial or unknown effectiveness
IN = Ineffective/No interventiona
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Nature of intervention: How risky, medically burdensome, or intensive is the intervention? 3 = Low risk, or medically acceptable and low intensity
2 = Moderate risk, moderately acceptable or intensive
1 = Greater risk, less acceptable and substantial intensity
0 = High risk, poorly acceptable or intensive
N/A
a Do not score the remaining categories

Prevalence of the Genetic Condition

Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) hereditary neuropathy is the most common genetic cause of neuropathy. Estimates of the prevalence of CMT range from 9.7/100,000 in Serbia to 82.3/100,000 in Norway. DNM2-related intermediate Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy (DI-CMTB) is a rare cause of CMT. Up to 3.4% of CMT (in which CMT1A, 1B, and 1X have already been excluded) is caused by a DNM2 pathogenic variant.
View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1358, S Z?chner, et al. (2010) NCBI: NBK45014, Barreto LC, et al. (2016) PMID: 26849231

Clinical Features (Signs / symptoms)

CMT hereditary neuropathy refers to a group of disorders characterized by a chronic motor and sensory polyneuropathy resulting from involvement of peripheral nerves and affecting the motor system and/or the sensory system. DI-CMTB is considered a “dominant intermediate form” of CMT neuropathy given its autosomal dominant inheritance and “intermediate” findings between a demyelinating and axonal neuropathy using electrophysiologic criteria using nerve conduction velocities. DI-CMTB has a classic, mild to moderately severe Charcot-Marie-Tooth hereditary neuropathy phenotype that often includes pes cavus foot deformity (high instep), depressed tendon reflexes, distal muscle weakness and atrophy, and sensory loss. Some individuals require braces or other walking aids and 3% of individuals with DI-CMTB become wheelchair bound. Other findings include asymptomatic neutropenia and early-onset cataracts (often noted in childhood before age 15 years).It is usually not possible to differentiate between DI-CMTB, other intermediate forms of CMT, and most CMT2 types based on clinical findings, unless cataract and/or neutropenia (occasional findings in DI-CMTB) are present.
View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1358, S Z?chner, et al. (2010) NCBI: NBK45014

Natural History (Important subgroups & survival / recovery)

Individuals with CMT experience symmetric, slowly progressive distal motor neuropathy of the arms and legs usually beginning in the first to third decade. Age of onset varies greatly among affected individuals and ranges from age two to 50 years.
View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1358, S Z?chner, et al. (2010) NCBI: NBK45014

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Dominant

Prevalence of Genetic Variants

Unknown
Information on the prevalence of DNM2 pathogenic variants was not identified.

Penetrance (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

>= 40 %
34 individuals were examined among a cohort of 6 families with an identified DNM2 pathogenic variant. The mean age of onset was 16 years, ranging from 2 to 50 years. Of the 34 family members with an identified DNM2 pathogenic variant, 32 had signs of neuropathy. Among the two individuals reporting no symptoms of neuropathy (aged 18 and 23), one had hematological abnormalities and cataracts, the second was found to have some mild features of CMT upon examination. Two families had associated neutropenia, and 1 family developed early-onset cataracts.
Tier 3 View Citations

S Z?chner, et al. (2010) NCBI: NBK45014, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2013) OMIM: 606482, Claeys KG, et al. (2009) PMID: 19502294

Relative Risk (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
No information on relative risk was identified.

Expressivity

Age of onset and symptoms can vary even within the same family.
Tier 3 View Citations

S Z?chner, et al. (2010) NCBI: NBK45014, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2013) OMIM: 606482

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Patient Management

To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with DI-CMTB, the following evaluations are recommended: neurological examination; electrophysiological studies to establish a baseline; complete blood count with absolute neutrophil count (to evaluate for neutropenia); ophthalmologic examination for cataract; and consultation with a medical geneticist and/or genetic counselor.
Tier 4 View Citations

S Z?chner, et al. (2010) NCBI: NBK45014

No treatment reverses or slows the natural progression of DI-CMTB. Treatment of DI-CMTB is symptomatic and involves evaluation and management by a multidisciplinary team that includes neurologists, orthopedic surgeons, and physical and occupations therapists. Due to the great phenotypic variability, disease treatment should be tailored to the individual’s needs. These treatments may include: ankle/foot orthoses; orthopedic surgery; forearm crutches/canes/wheelchairs; treatment of musculoskeletal pain with acetaminophen or NSAIDS; and career and employment counseling.
Tier 4 View Citations

S Z?chner, et al. (2010) NCBI: NBK45014

Physical therapies such as stretching and exercise are recommended to prevent secondary complications such as foot contractures, acquired deformities, difficulty walking, and, in severe cases, inability to ambulate.
Tier 4 View Citations

S Z?chner, et al. (2010) NCBI: NBK45014

A systematic review of exercise interventions for individuals with CMT (not DI-CMTB specifically) identified 9 studies of 134 individuals with CMT (3 randomized trials, 5 quasi-experimental, 1 case report). This review found that although benefits appear to be gained from exercise in strength and function in some studies, most outcomes reported were not statistically significant. The authors concluded that the optimal exercise modality and intensity for people with CMT, the clinical relevance of the changes observed, and the safety of exercise in these patients is still unclear. A review of four RCTs (149 patients with neuromuscular disease) found no benefit of any intervention for increasing ankle range of motion.
Tier 1 View Citations

Sman AD, et al. (2015) PMID: 26010435, Rose KJ, et al. (2010) PMID: 20166090

Preoperative assessment for co-morbidities and autonomic denervation is recommended. During surgical positioning, transport and mobilization, cautious positioning and protection of pressure points is recommended to avoid nerve compression. Neuromuscular block monitoring during surgery is also recommended.
Tier 4 View Citations

Errando C, Pasha T, Pareyson D. (2014) URL: www.orphananesthesia.eu.

Surveillance

Surveillance includes regular evaluation by a multidisciplinary team to determine neurologic status and function disability.
Tier 4 View Citations

S Z?chner, et al. (2010) NCBI: NBK45014

Circumstances to Avoid

Medications that are toxic or potentially toxic to persons with CMT comprise a spectrum of risk ranging from definite high risk to negligible risk. Vincristine and paclitaxel (chemotherapeutic agents) pose a definite high risk and should be avoided by all patients with CMT, including those who are asymptomatic; other medications may pose moderate to significant risk.
Tier 4 View Citations

S Z?chner, et al. (2010) NCBI: NBK45014

Avoiding succinylcholine, a muscle relaxant used for anesthesia, is recommended.
Tier 4 View Citations

Errando C, Pasha T, Pareyson D. (2014) URL: www.orphananesthesia.eu.

A review of case reports addressing CMT and toxic medication effects identified 22 reports (30 patients) addressing vincristine toxicity. 18 of 30 patients developed marked sensory symptoms or new onset weakness, with some developing dysarthria and dysphagia. Nearly all reports describe eventual improvement, but frequently not to baseline levels. These cases occurred in both adults (15) and children (15). Most individuals having a reaction were previously unsuspected or undiagnosed with CMT (26 of 30) and were only recognized following administration of vincristine; however, 10 cases, in retrospect, had overt clinical signs or a close relative with known CMT. A review of the CMT North American Database (including 209 individuals) identified 19 medications associated with clinical worsening. The majority of cases reviewed did not have information on genotype of CMT subtype; however, of those cases with identified subtypes the vast majority were CMT1A.
Tier 5 View Citations

Weimer LH, et al. (2006) PMID: 16386273

Obesity should be avoided as it makes walking more difficult.
Tier 4 View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1358

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Nature of Intervention

Potential interventions include examinations (physical exam, electrophysiological, ophthalmologic, family history, genetics consultation), physical therapy/stretching, and avoidance of certain medications.
Context: Adult
View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1358, S Z?chner, et al. (2010) NCBI: NBK45014, Sman AD, et al. (2015) PMID: 26010435, Rose KJ, et al. (2010) PMID: 20166090, Errando C, Pasha T, Pareyson D. (2014) URL: www.orphananesthesia.eu.

Chance to Escape Clinical Detection

Evaluation may determine that one is affected but has escaped previous diagnosis because of failure by health care professionals to recognize the syndrome and/or a milder phenotypic presentation.
Context: Adult
Tier 4 View Citations

S Z?chner, et al. (2010) NCBI: NBK45014

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Gene Condition Associations
OMIM Identifier Primary MONDO Identifier Additional MONDO Identifiers
DNM2 606482 0011674 0016431, 0019548

References List

Barreto LC, Oliveira FS, Nunes PS, de Franca Costa IM, Garcez CA, Goes GM, Neves EL, de Souza Siqueira Quintans J, de Souza Araujo AA. (2016) Epidemiologic Study of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease: A Systematic Review. Neuroepidemiology. 46(3):157-65.

CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH DISEASE, DOMINANT INTERMEDIATE B; CMTDIB. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 606482, (2013) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

Claeys KG, Zuchner S, Kennerson M, Berciano J, Garcia A, Verhoeven K, Storey E, Merory JR, Bienfait HM, Lammens M, Nelis E, Baets J, De Vriendt E, Berneman ZN, De Veuster I, Vance JM, Nicholson G, Timmerman V, De Jonghe P. (2009) Phenotypic spectrum of dynamin 2 mutations in Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy. Brain : a journal of neurology. 132(Pt 7):1741-52.

Errando C, Pasha T, Pareyson D. Anaesthesia recommendations for patients suffering from Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Orphan Anesthesia (2014) Accessed: 2018-01-18. URL: http://www.orphananesthesia.eu/de/erkrankungen/zu-erledigen/doc_view/139-charcot-marie-tooth-disease.html

Rose KJ, Burns J, Wheeler DM, North KN. (2010) Interventions for increasing ankle range of motion in patients with neuromuscular disease. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. CD006973.

S Z?chner, F Tao. DNM2-Related Intermediate Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy. (2010) [Updated Jun 25 2015]. In: MP Adam, HH Ardinger, RA Pagon, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK45014/

Sman AD, Hackett D, Fiatarone Singh M, Fornusek C, Menezes MP, Burns J. (2015) Systematic review of exercise for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS. 20(4):347-62.

TD Bird. Charcot-Marie-Tooth Hereditary Neuropathy Overview. (1998) [Updated Sep 01 2016]. In: RA Pagon, MP Adam, HH Ardinger, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1358/

Weimer LH, Podwall D. (2006) Medication-induced exacerbation of neuropathy in Charcot Marie Tooth disease. Journal of the neurological sciences. 242(1-2):47-54.

Early Rule-Out Summary

This topic passed the early rule out stage

Findings of Early Rule-Out Assessment

  1. Is there a qualifying resource, such as a practice guideline or systematic review, for the genetic condition?
  2. Does the practice guideline or systematic review indicate that the result is actionable in one or more of the following ways?
  3. a. Patient Management

    b. Surveillance or Screening

    c. Circumstances to Avoid

  4. Is it actionable in an undiagnosed adult with the condition?
  5. Is this condition an important health problem?
  6. Is there at least on known pathogenic variant with at least moderate penetrance (≥40%) or moderate relative risk (≥2) in any population?