Actionability Assertions

Gene Condition (MONDO ID) OMIM ID Final Assertion
ACTA2 familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection (0019625) 611788 Strong Actionability
FBN1 familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection (0019625) 154700 Strong Actionability
LOX familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection (0019625) 617168 Strong Actionability
MYH11 familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection (0019625) 132900 Strong Actionability
PRKG1 familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection (0019625) 615436 Strong Actionability
SMAD3 familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection (0019625) 613795 Strong Actionability
TGFB2 familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection (0019625) 614816 Strong Actionability
TGFBR1 familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection (0019625) 609192 Strong Actionability
TGFBR2 familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection (0019625) 610168 Strong Actionability

Actionability Assertion Rationale

  • All experts agreed with the assertion computed according to the rubric. Unlike Marfan syndrome, this was not asserted as definitive since the evidence for the effectiveness of the intervention was based on Marfan syndrome rather than isolated thoracic aortic aneurysm.

Actionability Scores

Outcome / Intervention Pair Severity Likelihood Effectiveness Nature of Intervention Total Score
Clinically significant aortic aneurysm / Aortic surveillance 3 3C 2C 3 11CC
Aortic dilation progression / Pharmacotherapy 2 3C 2B 3 10CB
View scoring key
Domain of Actionability Scoring Metric State of the Knowledgebase
Severity: What is the nature of the threat to health to an individual? 3 = Sudden death as a reasonably possible outcome
2 = Reasonable possibility of death or major morbidity
1 = Modest morbidity
0 = Minimal or no morbidity
N/A
Likelihood: What is the chance that the outcome will occur? 3 = >40% chance
2 = 5%-39% chance
1 = 1%-4% chance
0 = <1% chance
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Effectiveness: What is the effectiveness of a specific intervention in preventing or diminishing the risk of harm? 3 = Highly effective
2 = Moderately effective
1 = Minimally effective
0 = Controversial or unknown effectiveness
IN = Ineffective/No interventiona
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Nature of intervention: How risky, medically burdensome, or intensive is the intervention? 3 = Low risk, or medically acceptable and low intensity
2 = Moderate risk, moderately acceptable or intensive
1 = Greater risk, less acceptable and substantial intensity
0 = High risk, poorly acceptable or intensive
N/A
a Do not score the remaining categories

Prevalence of the Genetic Condition

The estimated population prevalence of familial thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections (FTAAD) ranges between 1:5,000 and 1:4,000,000 in adults depending on the occurrence of an isolated thoracic aortic aneurysm or as a symptom of a syndromic disorder, excluding non-genetic causes.
View Citations

Arslan-Kirchner M, et al. (2016) PMID: 26508578

Clinical Features (Signs / symptoms)

FTAAD is a rare genetic vascular disease characterized by the familial occurrence of thoracic aortic aneurysm, dissection, or dilatation affecting one or more aortic segments (aortic root, ascending aorta, arch, or descending aorta). While in the past, FTAAD of known genetic cause may have been considered to be either syndromic (part of a set of clinical findings such as in Marfan syndrome, Loeys-Dietz syndrome, or Ehlers-Danlos syndrome) or non-syndromic (occurring as an isolated finding), the distinction between syndromic and non-syndromic FTAAD has become increasingly blurred as it is common for pathogenic variants in a gene to result in a phenotypic spectrum that ranges from syndromic to non-syndromic. This report focuses on non-syndromic FTAAD; syndromic forms of FTAAD have been summarized in other reports. Depending on the size, location, and progression rate of dilatation/dissection, patients may be asymptomatic or may present with dyspnea, cough, jaw, neck, chest or back pain, head, neck or upper limb edema, difficulty swallowing, voice hoarseness, pale skin, faint pulse, and/or numbness/tingling in limbs.
View Citations

DM Milewicz, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1120, Zentner, D., West, M., Ades, L.. (2016) URL: www.csanz.edu.au., Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 91387.

Natural History (Important subgroups & survival / recovery)

In the absence of surgical repair, affected individuals typically have progressive enlargement of the aorta leading to a life-threatening acute dissection or rupture. The age of onset and presentation of aortic disease are highly variable across genes, as are other vascular diseases and features. Pregnant women are at an increased risk for complications such as rapid aortic root enlargement and aortic dissection or rupture during pregnancy, delivery, and the post-partum period. Onset can range from childhood to adulthood.
View Citations

DM Milewicz, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1120, Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 91387.

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Dominant

Prevalence of Genetic Variants

Unknown
Information regarding the prevalence of genetic mutations associated with FTAAD was unavailable.

Penetrance (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
FTAAD displays incomplete penetrance, primarily in women.
Tier 3 View Citations

Hiratzka LF, et al. (2010) PMID: 20359588

>= 40 %
A study of 965 patients with FBN1 pathogenic variants indicated that 29% had an aortic event defined as either aortic dissection or prophylactic aortic aneurysm repair (estimated cumulative risk by age 60 was 74%, 95% CI: 67-81%). Specifically, 19% had an aortic dissection (estimated cumulative risk by age 60 was 51%, 95% CI: 42-60%) and 10% underwent prophylactic surgery (estimated cumulative risk by age 60 was 40%, 95% CI: 33-49%).
Tier 3 View Citations

DM Milewicz, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1120

>= 40 %
A study of 277 individuals with ACTA2 pathogenic variants indicated that 48% had an aortic event defined as either an aortic dissection (42%) or surgical repair of aortic aneurysms (6%). An additional 9% had an aneurysm that did not require repair. The overall cumulative risk of an aortic event by age 86 was estimated as 76% (95% CI: 64-86%).
Tier 3 View Citations

DM Milewicz, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1120

>= 40 %
A study of 176 individuals with TGFBR1 pathogenic variants and 265 with TGFBR2 pathogenic variants indicated that the first aortic event was aortic dissection in 20% for TGFBR1 and 21% for TGFBR2 and aortic aneurysm repair in 20% for TGFBR1 and 24% for TGFBR2. Survival estimates indicated that 100% of individuals with TGFBR1 variants would have a vascular or aortic event (including surgery or dissection) by age 80 and 100% of individuals with TGFBR2 variants would have a vascular or aortic event by age 90.
Tier 3 View Citations

DM Milewicz, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1120

>= 40 %
A study of 31 individuals with PRKG1 pathogenic variants indicated that 63% presented with an aortic dissection and 37% had aortic root enlargement. The cumulative risk of an aortic dissection or repair of an aortic aneurysm by age 55 has been estimated as 86% (95% CI: 70-95%).
Tier 3 View Citations

DM Milewicz, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1120

>= 40 %
A study of 44 individuals with SMAD3 pathogenic variants indicated that 71% had an aortic root aneurysm, 29% had an aortic dissection, and 34% underwent prophylactic aortic aneurysm repair.
Tier 3 View Citations

DM Milewicz, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1120

>= 40 %
A study of 23 individuals with TGFB2 pathogenic variants indicated that 74% had an aortic root aneurysm, 3% had an aortic dissection, and 9% underwent aortic aneurysm repair. (Tier 3)
Tier 3 View Citations

DM Milewicz, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1120

>= 40 %
A study of 12 individuals with MYH11 pathogenic variants indicated that 34% had an aortic dissection and one individual (8%) underwent prophylactic aortic aneurysm repair.
Tier 3 View Citations

DM Milewicz, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1120

>= 40 %
A study of 15 individuals with LOX pathogenic variants indicated that 73% had aortic aneurysms and 1 individual (7%) had an aortic dissection.
Tier 3 View Citations

Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2016) OMIM: 617168

Relative Risk (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
Information regarding relative risk was unavailable.

Expressivity

No information on variable expressivity was available.

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Patient Management

Management of thoracic aortic aneurysm and/or dissection requires coordinated input from a multidisciplinary team of specialists familiar with FTAAD, including a clinical geneticist, cardiologist, and cardiothoracic and vascular surgeons.
Tier 4 View Citations

DM Milewicz, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1120

Prophylactic surgical repair of the aorta is recommended at 4.5-5.0 cm for patients with pathogenic variants in MYH11, SMAD3, and ACTA2 and at 4.0-4.5 cm for patients with pathogenic variants in TGFBR1 or TGFBR2. Earlier repair can be considered in patients with a family history of aortic dissection, growth of the aorta approaches 1 cm/year, or aortic regurgitation. In patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS), timely repair of aortic aneurysms prolongs survival and approaches that of age-matched controls; however, evidence on effectiveness was not provided for patients with FTAAD.
Tier 2 View Citations

Svensson LG, et al. (2013) PMID: 23688839, Hiratzka LF, et al. (2010) PMID: 20359588, Pyeritz RE, et al. (2012) PMID: 22237449, Baumgartner H, et al. (2017) PMID: 28886619, Boodhwani M, et al. (2014) PMID: 24882528

For female patients considering pregnancy, a prophylactic repair may be considered when the aortic root exceeds 4.0 cm.
Tier 2 View Citations

Svensson LG, et al. (2013) PMID: 23688839

Beta adrenergic-blocking agents are recommended to reduce aortic dilation.
Tier 2 View Citations

Pyeritz RE, et al. (2012) PMID: 22237449

Though no evidence for effectiveness of these medications is available for FTAAD, a meta-analysis of five cohort studies among children and adolescents with MFS indicated that beta-blocker treatment decreased the rate of aortic dilation compared to no treatment (standardized mean difference: -1.30; 95% CI: -2.11 to -0.49; p=0.002). A randomized trial of 70 patients with MFS aged 12-50 years showed that beta-blocker vs. no treatment slowed the rate of aortic dissection as measured by the slope of the aortic ratio, calculated by dividing the measured aortic diameter by the diameter predicted by the participant’s height, weight, and age (mean slope of the aortic ratio plotted against time: 0.084 vs. 0.023, respectively). However, none of the studies demonstrated an impact on mortality, occurrence of aortic dissection, or the need for elective repair of the aorta and/or aortic valve, though these studies were likely underpowered.
Tier 1 View Citations

Gao L, et al. (2011) PMID: 21443687, Koo HK, et al. (2017) PMID: 29110304

Losartan was added as an alternative to beta adrenergic-blocking agents in FTAAD after studies showed its efficacy in children and young adults with MFS who were randomly assigned to losartan or atenolol.
Tier 3 View Citations

DM Milewicz, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1120

A meta-analysis of six randomized clinical trials among children and adults with MFS indicated that losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, significantly decreased the rate of aortic dilation compared to no losartan treatment (standardized mean difference: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.25 to 0.00; p=0.04). However, improvements in mortality, cardiovascular surgery, or aortic dissection or rupture were assessed but not observed. Follow-up time in these studies ranged from 35 months to 3.5 years, which may have limited the ability to assess these outcomes.
Tier 1 View Citations

Gao L, et al. (2016) PMID: 27187761

Hypertension should be promptly identified and treated.
Tier 2 View Citations

Zentner, D., West, M., Ades, L.. (2016) URL: www.csanz.edu.au.

Other cardiovascular risk factors, including hyperlipidemia, should be addressed
Tier 4 View Citations

DM Milewicz, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1120

Individuals with a pathogenic variant in TGFBR1/2 should be taught the signs and symptoms of aortic dissection and should consider wearing a medical alert bracelet.
Tier 2 View Citations

Pyeritz RE, et al. (2012) PMID: 22237449

Pregnancy and the post-partum period confer a higher risk for aortic complications. Among women with aortopathy with aortic dissection and/or rupture during this period, about 50% of events occur in the third trimester and 33% in the peripartum period. Women should be managed closely throughout the pregnancy, ideally in a high-risk obstetric clinic with a multidisciplinary team. Pregnant women should have strict blood pressure control to prevent stage II hypertension. 4.4% of carefully monitored patients with MFS developed aortic dissection and in unmonitored patients, the risk is likely higher.
Tier 2 View Citations

Zentner, D., West, M., Ades, L.. (2016) URL: www.csanz.edu.au., Hiratzka LF, et al. (2010) PMID: 20359588

Surveillance

Patients with a confirmed genetic variant known to predispose to aortic aneurysms and aortic dissections should undergo complete aortic imaging at initial diagnosis and 6 months later to determine the rate of aortic enlargement followed by imaging annually or every 6 months for those with a >4.5 cm diameter, a significant rate of growth, or aortic regurgitation.
Tier 2 View Citations

Svensson LG, et al. (2013) PMID: 23688839, Hiratzka LF, et al. (2010) PMID: 20359588, Pyeritz RE, et al. (2012) PMID: 22237449, Boodhwani M, et al. (2014) PMID: 24882528, Braverman AC, et al. (2015) PMID: 26542664

Circumstances to Avoid

Athletes with a pathogenic variant in a gene associated with FTAAD should not participate in low and moderate static/low dynamic competitive sports if they have more than one of the following:\n• Aortic root dilation\n• Moderate to severe mitral regurgitation\n• Family history of aortic dissection\n• Cerebrovascular disease\n• Branch vessel aneurysm or dissection.
Tier 2 View Citations

Braverman AC, et al. (2015) PMID: 26542664

Athletes with FTAAD should not participate in any competitive sports that involve intense physical exertion or the potential for bodily collision.
Tier 2 View Citations

Braverman AC, et al. (2015) PMID: 26542664

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Nature of Intervention

The identified interventions involve invasive prophylactic surgery, which is likely associated with some risk of mortality and morbidity.
Context: Adult Pediatric

Chance to Escape Clinical Detection

Thoracic aortic aneurysms are usually asymptomatic and enlarge over time. Undiagnosed or untreated thoracic aortic aneurysms can lead to life-threatening acute ascending aortic dissections.
Context: Adult Pediatric
Tier 4 View Citations

DM Milewicz, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1120

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Gene Condition Associations
OMIM Identifier Primary MONDO Identifier Additional MONDO Identifiers
ACTA2 611788 0019625
FBN1 154700 0019625
LOX 617168 0019625
MYH11 132900 0019625
PRKG1 615436 0019625
SMAD3 613795 0019625
TGFB2 614816 0019625
TGFBR1 609192 0019625
TGFBR2 610168 0019625

References List

AORTIC ANEURYSM, FAMILIAL THORACIC 10; AAT10. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 617168, (2016) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

Arslan-Kirchner M, Arbustini E, Boileau C, Charron P, Child AH, Collod-Beroud G, De Backer J, De Paepe A, Dierking A, Faivre L, Hoffjan S, Jondeau G, Keyser B, Loeys B, Mayer K, Robinson PN, Schmidtke J. (2016) Clinical utility gene card for: Hereditary thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection including next-generation sequencing-based approaches. European journal of human genetics : EJHG. 24(1):e1-5.

Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Holm PJ, Iung B, Lancellotti P, Lansac E, Rodriguez Munoz D, Rosenhek R, Sjogren J, Tornos Mas P, Vahanian A, Walther T, Wendler O, Windecker S, Zamorano JL. (2017) 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. European heart journal. 38(36):2739-2791.

Boodhwani M, Andelfinger G, Leipsic J, Lindsay T, McMurtry MS, Therrien J, Siu SC. (2014) Canadian Cardiovascular Society position statement on the management of thoracic aortic disease. The Canadian journal of cardiology. 30(6):577-89.

Braverman AC, Harris KM, Kovacs RJ, Maron BJ. (2015) Eligibility and Disqualification Recommendations for Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: Task Force 7: Aortic Diseases, Including Marfan Syndrome: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 66(21):2398-2405.

DM Milewicz, E Regalado. Heritable Thoracic Aortic Disease Overview. (2003) [Updated Dec 29 2016]. In: RA Pagon, MP Adam, HH Ardinger, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1120/

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection. Orphanet encyclopedia, http://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=en&Expert=91387

Gao L, Chen L, Fan L, Gao D, Liang Z, Wang R, Lu W. (2016) The effect of losartan on progressive aortic dilatation in patients with Marfan's syndrome: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized clinical trials. International journal of cardiology. 217(1874-1754):190-4.

Gao L, Mao Q, Wen D, Zhang L, Zhou X, Hui R. (2011) The effect of beta-blocker therapy on progressive aortic dilatation in children and adolescents with Marfan's syndrome: a meta-analysis. Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992). 100(9):e101-5.

Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, Bersin RM, Carr VF, Casey DE Jr, Eagle KA, Hermann LK, Isselbacher EM, Kazerooni EA, Kouchoukos NT, Lytle BW, Milewicz DM, Reich DL, Sen S, Shinn JA, Svensson LG, Williams DM. (2010) 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology,American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons,and Society for Vascular Medicine. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 55(14):e27-e129.

Koo HK, Lawrence KA, Musini VM. (2017) Beta-blockers for preventing aortic dissection in Marfan syndrome. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 11(1469-493X):CD011103.

Pyeritz RE. (2012) Evaluation of the adolescent or adult with some features of Marfan syndrome. Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics. 14(1):171-7.

Svensson LG, Adams DH, Bonow RO, Kouchoukos NT, Miller DC, O'Gara PT, Shahian DM, Schaff HV, Akins CW, Bavaria JE, Blackstone EH, David TE, Desai ND, Dewey TM, D'Agostino RS, Gleason TG, Harrington KB, Kodali S, Kapadia S, Leon MB, Lima B, Lytle BW, Mack MJ, Reardon M, Reece TB, Reiss GR, Roselli EE, Smith CR, Thourani VH, Tuzcu EM, Webb J, Williams MR. (2013) Aortic valve and ascending aorta guidelines for management and quality measures. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 95(6 Suppl):S1-66.

Zentner, D., West, M., Ades, L.. Updated on the diagnosis and management of inherited aortopathies, including Marfan Syndrome. (2016) URL: https://www.csanz.edu.au/

Early Rule-Out Summary

This topic passed the early rule out stage

Findings of Early Rule-Out Assessment

  1. Is there a qualifying resource, such as a practice guideline or systematic review, for the genetic condition?
  2. Does the practice guideline or systematic review indicate that the result is actionable in one or more of the following ways?
  3. a. Patient Management

    b. Surveillance or Screening

    c. Circumstances to Avoid

  4. Is it actionable in an undiagnosed adult with the condition?
  5. Is this condition an important health problem?
  6. Is there at least on known pathogenic variant with at least moderate penetrance (≥40%) or moderate relative risk (≥2) in any population?