Actionability Assertions

Gene Condition (MONDO ID) OMIM ID Final Assertion
COL3A1 N/A () 130050 Assertion Pending

Actionability Assertion Rationale

  • This topic was initially scored prior to development of the process for making actionability assertions. The Actionability Working Group decided to defer making an assertion until after the topic could be reviewed through the update process.

Actionability Scores

Outcome / Intervention Pair Severity Likelihood Effectiveness Nature of Intervention Total Score
Vascular or organ rupture or perforation / Avoidance of invasive procedures 3 3C 2A 2 10CA
View scoring key
Domain of Actionability Scoring Metric State of the Knowledgebase
Severity: What is the nature of the threat to health to an individual? 3 = Sudden death as a reasonably possible outcome
2 = Reasonable possibility of death or major morbidity
1 = Modest morbidity
0 = Minimal or no morbidity
N/A
Likelihood: What is the chance that the outcome will occur? 3 = >40% chance
2 = 5%-39% chance
1 = 1%-4% chance
0 = <1% chance
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Effectiveness: What is the effectiveness of a specific intervention in preventing or diminishing the risk of harm? 3 = Highly effective
2 = Moderately effective
1 = Minimally effective
0 = Controversial or unknown effectiveness
IN = Ineffective/No interventiona
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Nature of intervention: How risky, medically burdensome, or intensive is the intervention? 3 = Low risk, or medically acceptable and low intensity
2 = Moderate risk, moderately acceptable or intensive
1 = Greater risk, less acceptable and substantial intensity
0 = High risk, poorly acceptable or intensive
N/A
a Do not score the remaining categories

Prevalence of the Genetic Condition

There are no good current estimates of the prevalence of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) type IV in any population because a large proportion of cases remain undiagnosed. A minimum prevalence of about 1:200,000 can be estimated by extrapolating from the number of known individuals with genetic testing, biochemical, or pedigree-confirmed diagnoses in the United States.EDS type IV appears to constitute approximately 5-10% of all EDS cases.
View Citations

MG Pepin, et al. (1999) NCBI: NBK1494, Burcharth J, et al. (2012) PMID: 23095510, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, vascular type. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 286., Bergqvist D, et al. (2013) PMID: 23751452

Clinical Features (Signs / symptoms)

EDS type IV, or vascular EDS, is characterized by thin, translucent skin; easy bruising; characteristic facial appearance (in some individuals); and arterial, intestinal, and/or uterine fragility. Vascular dissection or rupture, gastrointestinal perforation, or organ rupture are the presenting signs in the majority of adults identified to have EDS type IV. Arterial rupture may be preceded by aneurysm, arteriovenous fistulae, or dissection, but also may occur spontaneously.The vascular complications may affect all anatomical areas; spontaneous rupture of the aorta and medium-to-large size vessels are the most frequent complications reported. There is also a high risk of recurrent perforation in the sigmoid colon.
View Citations

MG Pepin, et al. (1999) NCBI: NBK1494, Burcharth J, et al. (2012) PMID: 23095510, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, vascular type. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 286., Bergqvist D, et al. (2013) PMID: 23751452, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2016) OMIM: 130050, Maron BJ, et al. (2005) PMID: 15837284, Hiratzka LF, et al. (2010) PMID: 20359588

Natural History (Important subgroups & survival / recovery)

The overall mortality of EDS type IV is 90% by the age of 50 because of spontaneous rupture of vessels and internal organs.The median survival for individuals with EDS type IV is 48 years.Vascular fragility is dominant in the third and fourth decade.Pregnancy increases the likelihood of a uterine or vascular rupture. Pregnancy for women with EDS type IV confers as much as a 12% risk for death from peripartum arterial rupture or uterine rupture.
View Citations

MG Pepin, et al. (1999) NCBI: NBK1494, Burcharth J, et al. (2012) PMID: 23095510, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, vascular type. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 286., Hiratzka LF, et al. (2010) PMID: 20359588

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Dominant

Prevalence of Genetic Variants

< 1-2 in 100000
The prevalence of individuals with mutations in COL3A1 is estimated to range from 1:50,000 to 1:200,000.
Tier 4 View Citations

MG Pepin, et al. (1999) NCBI: NBK1494

Penetrance (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

>= 40 %
Penetrance appears to be close to 100% with missense or exon-skipping mutations; the age at which the mutation becomes penetrant may vary
Tier 4 View Citations

MG Pepin, et al. (1999) NCBI: NBK1494

Relative Risk (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
NA

Expressivity

There is high variability in disease expression, highlighted by the fact that clinical diagnosis is based on any two of four possible major diagnostic criteria, and that two or more of thirteen possible minor diagnostic criteria are supportive but not sufficient for diagnosis.
Tier 4 View Citations

MG Pepin, et al. (1999) NCBI: NBK1494

A subpopulation of individuals with EDS type IV (3-4%) have haploinsufficiency mutations; improved outcomes are reported in this group, including a 15-year delay in onset of complications, similarly improved life expectancy, and paucity of both obstetric and bowel complications.
Tier 4 View Citations

MG Pepin, et al. (1999) NCBI: NBK1494

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Patient Management

Information on the effectiveness of the patient management recommendation(s) below was not provided.Currently, no consensus exists regarding the appropriate extent of evaluation at the time of initial diagnosis. Approach to a vascular evaluation depends on the age of the individual and the circumstances in which the diagnosis is made.
Tier 4 View Citations

MG Pepin, et al. (1999) NCBI: NBK1494

Invasive procedures (treatment, diagnostic, etc.) should be avoided, except in life-threatening situations.
Tier 1 View Citations

Burcharth J, et al. (2012) PMID: 23095510

Affected individuals are instructed to seek immediate medical attention for sudden, unexplained pain.
Tier 4 View Citations

MG Pepin, et al. (1999) NCBI: NBK1494

Educating pregnant women with EDS type IV as to possible complications, and frequent surveillance in a high-risk obstetrical program is recommended. Pregnancy for women with EDS type IV has as much as a 12% risk for death from peripartum arterial or uterine rupture.
Tier 4 View Citations

MG Pepin, et al. (1999) NCBI: NBK1494

A MedicAlert bracelet should be worn.
Tier 4 View Citations

MG Pepin, et al. (1999) NCBI: NBK1494

Surveillance

There are no published data that assess the efficacy of screening strategies to identify the regions in the arterial vasculature at highest risk.
View Citations

MG Pepin, et al. (1999) NCBI: NBK1494

Circumstances to Avoid

Individuals with EDS type IV should not engage in any competitive athletic activity.
Tier 2 View Citations

Burcharth J, et al. (2012) PMID: 23095510, Maron BJ, et al. (2005) PMID: 15837284

Unless the procedure is considered absolutely life-saving, surgery and all other invasive procedures should be avoided whenever possible.
Tier 1 View Citations

Burcharth J, et al. (2012) PMID: 23095510

Examples of invasive procedures: - Diagnostic colonoscopy should not be performed in patients with EDS type IV.
Tier 1 View Citations

Burcharth J, et al. (2012) PMID: 23095510

- Arteriograms are not recommended.

Tier 3 View Citations

MG Pepin, et al. (1999) NCBI: NBK1494

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Nature of Intervention

Management could result in significant alterations to lifestyle choices (pregnancy, participation in sports) and medical treatment/screening
Context: Adult

Chance to Escape Clinical Detection

Because many families with EDS type IV are identified only after a severe complication or death, it is likely that individuals/families with COL3A1 mutations with a mild phenotype do not come to medical attention and, therefore, go undetected
Context: Adult
Tier 4 View Citations

MG Pepin, et al. (1999) NCBI: NBK1494

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Gene Condition Associations
OMIM Identifier Primary MONDO Identifier Additional MONDO Identifiers
COL3A1 130050

References List

Bergqvist D, Bjorck M, Wanhainen A. (2013) Treatment of vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a systematic review. Annals of surgery. 258(2):257-61.

Burcharth J, Rosenberg J. (2012) Gastrointestinal surgery and related complications in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a systematic review. Digestive surgery. 29(4):349-57.

EHLERS-DANLOS SYNDROME, TYPE IV, AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 130050, (2016) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, vascular type. Orphanet encyclopedia, http://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=en&Expert=286

Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, Bersin RM, Carr VF, Casey DE Jr, Eagle KA, Hermann LK, Isselbacher EM, Kazerooni EA, Kouchoukos NT, Lytle BW, Milewicz DM, Reich DL, Sen S, Shinn JA, Svensson LG, Williams DM. (2010) 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology,American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons,and Society for Vascular Medicine. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 55(14):e27-e129.

Maron BJ, Ackerman MJ, Nishimura RA, Pyeritz RE, Towbin JA, Udelson JE. (2005) Task Force 4: HCM and other cardiomyopathies, mitral valve prolapse, myocarditis, and Marfan syndrome. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 45(8):1340-5.

MG Pepin, ML Murray, PH Byers. Vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. (1999) [Updated Nov 19 2015]. In: RA Pagon, MP Adam, HH Ardinger, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1494/

Early Rule-Out Summary

This topic did not pass the early rule out stage due to insufficient evidence for actionability. Thus, this topic did not move forward for a full evidence curation and summary report. This topic may be reconsidered if additional evidence becomes available.

Findings of Early Rule-Out Assessment

  1. Is there a qualifying resource, such as a practice guideline or systematic review, for the genetic condition?
  2. Does the practice guideline or systematic review indicate that the result is actionable in one or more of the following ways?
  3. a. Patient Management

    b. Surveillance or Screening

    c. Circumstances to Avoid

  4. Is it actionable in an undiagnosed adult with the condition?
  5. Is this condition an important health problem?
  6. Is there at least on known pathogenic variant with at least moderate penetrance (≥40%) or moderate relative risk (≥2) in any population?