Actionability Assertions

Gene Condition (MONDO ID) OMIM ID Final Assertion
PMP22 N/A (0019011) 118220 Assertion Pending
PMP22 N/A (0019011) 118300 Assertion Pending
MPZ N/A (0019011) 118200 Assertion Pending
LITAF N/A (0019011) 601098 Assertion Pending
EGR2 N/A (0019011) 607678 Assertion Pending
NEFL N/A (0019011) 607734 Assertion Pending

Actionability Assertion Rationale

  • This topic was initially scored prior to development of the process for making actionability assertions. The Actionability Working Group decided to defer making an assertion until after the topic could be reviewed through the update process.

Actionability Scores

Outcome / Intervention Pair Severity Likelihood Effectiveness Nature of Intervention Total Score
Demyelinating peripheral neuropathy / Regular medical evaluations 1 3C IN Not Scored IN
Demyelinating peripheral neuropathy / Avoidance of Vincristine, paclitaxel, succinylcholine 1 3C 3C 2 9CC
View scoring key
Domain of Actionability Scoring Metric State of the Knowledgebase
Severity: What is the nature of the threat to health to an individual? 3 = Sudden death as a reasonably possible outcome
2 = Reasonable possibility of death or major morbidity
1 = Modest morbidity
0 = Minimal or no morbidity
N/A
Likelihood: What is the chance that the outcome will occur? 3 = >40% chance
2 = 5%-39% chance
1 = 1%-4% chance
0 = <1% chance
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Effectiveness: What is the effectiveness of a specific intervention in preventing or diminishing the risk of harm? 3 = Highly effective
2 = Moderately effective
1 = Minimally effective
0 = Controversial or unknown effectiveness
IN = Ineffective/No interventiona
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Nature of intervention: How risky, medically burdensome, or intensive is the intervention? 3 = Low risk, or medically acceptable and low intensity
2 = Moderate risk, moderately acceptable or intensive
1 = Greater risk, less acceptable and substantial intensity
0 = High risk, poorly acceptable or intensive
N/A
a Do not score the remaining categories

Prevalence of the Genetic Condition

Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) hereditary neuropathy is the most common genetic cause of neuropathy. Estimates of the prevalence of CMT range from 9.7/100,000 in Serbia to 82.3/100,000 in Norway. The prevalence of CMT type 1 (CMT1) has been estimated from 15:100,000-20:100,000. The prevalence of CMT1A (the most common subtype) is approximately 10:100,000.
View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1358, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 65753., Barreto LC, et al. (2016) PMID: 26849231

Clinical Features (Signs / symptoms)

The CMT1 subtypes, identified solely by molecular findings, are often clinically indistinguishable.The classic phenotype of CMT1 is a demyelinating peripheral neuropathy characterized by distal muscle weakness and atrophy, sensory loss, and slow nerve conduction velocity. It is usually slowly progressive and often associated with pes cavus foot deformity (high instep) and bilateral foot drop. Clinical severity is variable, ranging from extremely mild disease that goes unrecognized by patient or physician, to considerable weakness and disability, with fewer than 5% of individuals becoming wheelchair dependent. The typical presenting symptom of CMT1 is weakness of the feet and ankles. The typical affected adult has bilateral foot drop, symmetric atrophy of muscles below the knee (stork leg appearance), atrophy of intrinsic hand muscles, and absent tendon reflexes in both upper and lower extremities. The proximal muscles usually remain strong. Variable scoliosis may develop during adolescence. Mild to moderate sensory deficits of position, vibration, and pain/temperature commonly occur in the feet, but many affected individuals are unaware of this symptom. Pain, especially in the feet, is reported by 20%-30% of individuals. The pain is often musculoskeletal in origin but may be neuropathic in some cases. Other observed findings in CMT1 individuals include: vestibular impairment, sleep apnea, restless leg syndrome, episodic pressure palsies, impotence, hip dysplasia, pulmonary insufficiency, deafness or early hearing loss, and lower-limb muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration.
View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1358, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2016) OMIM: 118220, (2014) URL: www.orphananesthesia.eu., Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 65753.

Natural History (Important subgroups & survival / recovery)

Individuals with CMT1 usually become symptomatic between ages of five and 25; age of onset ranges from infancy (resulting in delayed walking) to the fourth and subsequent decades. Affected individuals experience long plateau periods without obvious deterioration. The disease does not decrease life span.Women have been reported to have earlier onset of symptoms (8.6 versus 14 years) and higher deterioration of quality of life compared to affected men.
View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1358, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2016) OMIM: 118220, (2014) URL: www.orphananesthesia.eu., Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 65753.

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Dominant

Prevalence of Genetic Variants

Unknown
Information on the prevalence of pathogenic variants associated with CMT1 was not identified. However, the prevalence of CMT type 1 (CMT1) has been estimated from 15:100,000-20:100,000. The estimated proportion of CMT1 cases related to each subtype include: CMT1A (70%-80%; PMP22), CMT1B (6%-10%; MPZ), CMT1C (1%-2%; LITAF), CMT1D (<2%; EGR2), CMT1E (<5%; PMP22), and CMT2E/1F (<5%; NEFL).
Tier 3 View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1358

Penetrance (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

>= 40 %
Penetrance of CMT1 is usually nearly 100%, but the wide range in age onset and severity may

result in under-recognition of individuals with mild or late-onset disease.
Tier 4 View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1358, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 65753., Aretz S, et al. (2010) PMID: 20512157

>= 40 %
A study of 109 persons (mean age 22 years; range 1-60 years) from completely ascertained sibships from 15 unrelated families, concluded that penetrance (as indicated by physical examination and nerve conduction) was 28% complete in the first decade and essentially complete by the middle of the third decade. However, this study was conducted prior to the introduction of genetic testing and was based on an assumption that 50% of sibships should be affected. Overall 48% of individuals were found to be affected (44% affected with probands excluded). The average age of onset was 12.2 years with a standard deviation of 7.3. The mean age at time of diagnosis was 18.3 years (range 3 to 54 years).
Tier 3 View Citations

Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2016) OMIM: 118220

Relative Risk (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
Information regarding relative risk was not identified.

Expressivity

Inter- and intra-familial phenotypic variability is common.
Tier 3 View Citations

Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2016) OMIM: 118220

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Patient Management

To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with CMT1, the following evaluations are recommended: physical examination, nerve conduction velocity (NCV), family history, and medical genetic consultation
Tier 4 View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1358

No treatment reverses or slows the natural progression of CMT. Treatment of CMT1 is symptomatic and involves evaluation and management by a multidisciplinary team that includes neurologists, physiatrist, orthopedic surgeons, and physical and occupational therapists. These treatments may include: ankle/foot orthoses; orthopedic surgery; forearm crutches/canes/wheelchairs; exercise as tolerated; serial night casting to help increase ankle flexibility; treatment of musculoskeletal pain with acetaminophen or NSAIDS; treatment of neuropathic pain with tricycle antidepressants or drugs such as carbamazepine or gabapentin; and career and employment counseling. Daily heel cord stretching exercises to prevent Achilles’ tendon shortening are desirable.
Tier 4 View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1358, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 65753.

A systematic review of exercise interventions for individuals with CMT identified 9 studies of 134 individuals with CMT (3 randomized trials, 5 quasi-experimental, 1 case report). This review found that although benefits appear to be gained from exercise in strength and function in some studies, most outcomes reported were not statistically significant. The authors concluded that the optimal exercise modality and intensity for people with CMT, the clinical relevance of the changes observed, and the safety of exercise in these patients is still unclear. A review of four RCTs (149 patients with neuromuscular disease) found no benefit of any studied intervention (night splits, prednisone, orthopedic surgery) for sustainably increasing ankle range of motion.
Tier 1 View Citations

Sman AD, et al. (2015) PMID: 26010435, Rose KJ, et al. (2010) PMID: 20166090

Preoperative assessment for co-morbidities and autonomic denervation is recommended. During surgical positioning, transport and mobilization, cautious positioning and protection of pressure points is recommended to avoid nerve compression. Neuromuscular block monitoring during surgery is also recommended.
Tier 4 View Citations

Surveillance

Individuals should be evaluated regularly by a team comprising physiatrists, neurologists, and physical and occupational therapists to determine neurologic status and functional disability.
Tier 4 View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1358

Individuals should undergo regular foot examination for pressure sores.
Tier 4 View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1358

Circumstances to Avoid

Obesity should be avoided because it makes walking more difficult.
Tier 4 View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1358, Aretz S, et al. (2010) PMID: 20512157

Over 30 medications have been identified as toxic or potentially toxic to persons with CMT comprise a spectrum of risk ranging from definite high risk to negligible risk. Vincristine and paclitaxel (chemotherapeutic agents) pose a definite high risk of nerve damage and should be avoided by all patients with CMT, including those who are asymptomatic.
Tier 4 View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1358

Avoiding succinylcholine, a muscle relaxant used for anesthesia, is recommended.
Tier 4 View Citations
A review of case reports addressing CMT and toxic medication effects identified 22 reports (30 patients) addressing vincristine toxicity. 18 of 30 patients developed marked sensory symptoms or new onset weakness, with some developing dysarthria and dysphagia. Nearly all reports describe eventual improvement, but frequently not to baseline levels. These cases occurred in both adults (15) and children (15). Most individuals having a reaction were previously unsuspected or undiagnosed with CMT (26 of 30) and were only recognized following administration of vincristine; however, 10 cases, in retrospect, had overt clinical signs or a close relative with known CMT. A review of the CMT North American Database (including 209 individuals) identified 19 medications associated with clinical worsening. The majority of cases reviewed did not have information on genotype of CMT subtype; however, of those cases with identified subtypes the vast majority were CMT1A.
Tier 5 View Citations

Weimer LH, et al. (2006) PMID: 16386273

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Nature of Intervention

Potential interventions include examinations (physical exam, electrophysiological, ophthalmologic, family history, genetics consultation), physical therapy/stretching, and avoidance of certain medications.
Context: Adult

Chance to Escape Clinical Detection

Mild disease may go unrecognized by the affected individual and physician.
Context: Adult
Tier 4 View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1358

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Gene Condition Associations
OMIM Identifier Primary MONDO Identifier Additional MONDO Identifiers
PMP22 118220 0019011 0007309
PMP22 118300 0019011 0007311
MPZ 118200 0019011 0007307
LITAF 601098 0019011 0010995
EGR2 607678 0019011 0011890
NEFL 607734 0019011 0011902

References List

Anaesthesia recommendations for patients suffering from Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. (2014) URL: http://www.orphananesthesia.eu/de/erkrankungen/zu-erledigen/doc_view/139-charcot-marie-tooth-disease.html

Aretz S, Rautenstrauss B, Timmerman V. (2010) Clinical utility gene card for: HMSN/HNPP HMSN types 1, 2, 3, 6 (CMT1,2,4, DSN, CHN, GAN, CCFDN, HNA); HNPP. European journal of human genetics : EJHG. 18(9).

Barreto LC, Oliveira FS, Nunes PS, de Franca Costa IM, Garcez CA, Goes GM, Neves EL, de Souza Siqueira Quintans J, de Souza Araujo AA. (2016) Epidemiologic Study of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease: A Systematic Review. Neuroepidemiology. 46(3):157-65.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1. Orphanet encyclopedia, http://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=en&Expert=65753

CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH DISEASE, DEMYELINATING, TYPE 1A; CMT1A. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 118220, (2016) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

Rose KJ, Burns J, Wheeler DM, North KN. (2010) Interventions for increasing ankle range of motion in patients with neuromuscular disease. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. CD006973.

Sman AD, Hackett D, Fiatarone Singh M, Fornusek C, Menezes MP, Burns J. (2015) Systematic review of exercise for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS. 20(4):347-62.

TD Bird. Charcot-Marie-Tooth Hereditary Neuropathy Overview. (1998) [Updated Sep 01 2016]. In: RA Pagon, MP Adam, HH Ardinger, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1358/

Weimer LH, Podwall D. (2006) Medication-induced exacerbation of neuropathy in Charcot Marie Tooth disease. Journal of the neurological sciences. 242(1-2):47-54.

Early Rule-Out Summary

This topic passed the early rule out stage

Findings of Early Rule-Out Assessment

  1. Is there a qualifying resource, such as a practice guideline or systematic review, for the genetic condition?
  2. Does the practice guideline or systematic review indicate that the result is actionable in one or more of the following ways?
  3. a. Patient Management

    b. Surveillance or Screening

    c. Circumstances to Avoid

  4. Is it actionable in an undiagnosed adult with the condition?
  5. Is this condition an important health problem?
  6. Is there at least on known pathogenic variant with at least moderate penetrance (≥40%) or moderate relative risk (≥2) in any population?