Actionability Assertions

Gene Condition (MONDO ID) OMIM ID Final Assertion
No assertions found.

Actionability Assertion Rationale

  • This topic was initially scored prior to development of the process for making actionability assertions. The Actionability Working Group decided to defer making an assertion until after the topic could be reviewed through the update process.

Actionability Scores

Outcome / Intervention Pair Severity Likelihood Effectiveness Nature of Intervention Total Score
Hepatic encephalopathy / Dietary modification with arginine and sodium pyruvate supplementation 2 0D 1N 3 6DN
Liver failure / Liver transplantation 2 0D 3C 0 5DC
View scoring key
Domain of Actionability Scoring Metric State of the Knowledgebase
Severity: What is the nature of the threat to health to an individual? 3 = Sudden death as a reasonably possible outcome
2 = Reasonable possibility of death or major morbidity
1 = Modest morbidity
0 = Minimal or no morbidity
N/A
Likelihood: What is the chance that the outcome will occur? 3 = >40% chance
2 = 5%-39% chance
1 = 1%-4% chance
0 = <1% chance
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Effectiveness: What is the effectiveness of a specific intervention in preventing or diminishing the risk of harm? 3 = Highly effective
2 = Moderately effective
1 = Minimally effective
0 = Controversial or unknown effectiveness
IN = Ineffective/No interventiona
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Nature of intervention: How risky, medically burdensome, or intensive is the intervention? 3 = Low risk, or medically acceptable and low intensity
2 = Moderate risk, moderately acceptable or intensive
1 = Greater risk, less acceptable and substantial intensity
0 = High risk, poorly acceptable or intensive
N/A
a Do not score the remaining categories

Prevalence of the Genetic Condition

The prevalence of adult‑onset type II citrullinemia (CTLN2) in Japan is 1 in 100,000-230,000. Until recently, citrin deficiency was thought to be restricted to Japan; however it is now recognized to be pan ethic with individuals in Israel, Pakistan, the United States, the United Kingdom, China, and the Czech Republic.
View Citations

Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2016) OMIM: 603471, K Kobayashi, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1181

Clinical Features (Signs / symptoms)

Citrin deficiency can manifest in newborns as neonatal intrahepatic cholestasis caused by

citrin deficiency (NICCD) characterized by cholestasis and variable hepatic dysfunction with some children developing liver cirrhosis. Citrin deficiency can also manifest in older children as growth retardation and abnormalities of serum lipid concentrations characterized as failure to thrive and dyslipidemia caused by citrin deficiency (FTTDCD). CTLN2 can manifest in children or adults as recurrent hyperammonemia with neuropsychiatric symptoms.CTLN2 is associated with decreased activity of argininosuccinate synthase activity and protein in the liver but normal levels in other tissues such as the kidney, brain, and fibroblasts. Manifestations of CTLN2 are sudden and may resemble those of encephalopathy or urea cycle disorders and are often provoked by alcohol and surgery intake, medication and/or surgery. Symptoms may include nocturnal delirium, aggression, irritability, hyperactivity, delusions, disorientation, restlessness, drowsiness, loss of memory, flapping tremor, convulsive seizures, and coma due to hyperammonemia. Death may result from brain edema. Complications occurring in more than 10% of individuals include: pancreatitis, hyperlipidemia, fatty liver, and hepatoma. Intrahepatic cholestasis may occur in rare cases; however these individuals may have had signs of NICCD in early childhood.CTLN2 patients are often characterized by fondness for protein-rich and/or lipid-rich foods and aversion to carbohydrate-rich foods. Most individuals are thin with a BMI lower than 20 in 90% and below 17 in 40% of individuals.
View Citations

Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2016) OMIM: 603471, K Kobayashi, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1181

Natural History (Important subgroups & survival / recovery)

Symptoms of NICCD are generally not severe and symptoms often resolve by age one with appropriate treatment including vitamin supplementation and modified formula; however, in some rare cases infants succumb to infection and liver cirrhosis and others require liver transplantation. Onset of FTDCD is typically around age one to two years. One or more decades later, some individuals with NICCD or FTTDCD may develop CTLN2; however individuals with CTLN2 may or may not have a prior history of NICCD or FTTDCD. The proportion of persons with NICCD or FTTDCD that evolves into CTLN2 is unknown. Historically, the time between NICCD and CTLN2 has been considered a silent, apparently healthy phase. However, laboratory and clinical abnormalities have been identified during this time and characterized as FTTDCD. Onset of CTLN2 is sudden, with a mean age of onset of 34.4 years with a range of 11-79 years. The male to female ratio of CTLN is 2.4 to 1; the reasons for unequal expression of the phenotype is unknown. Some patients may present with nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis or may develop hepatic fibrosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. In some cases, rapid progression can lead to brain edema and death within a few years of onset if liver transplantation is not possible.
View Citations

Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2016) OMIM: 603471, K Kobayashi, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1181

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Recessive

Prevalence of Genetic Variants

>1-2 in 100
In Japan, the frequency of homozygotes or compound heterozygotes for SLC25A13 pathogenic variants is calculated to be 1:17,000-21,000. Carrier or heterozygote rates have been estimated as 1:65-1:67. The estimated frequency in Korea is 1 in 50,000 and 1 in 17,000 in China with an estimated carrier frequency of 1:65 in China and 1:112 in Korea.
Tier 3 View Citations

Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2016) OMIM: 603471, K Kobayashi, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1181

Penetrance (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
No information on the penetrance of developing CTLN2 was identified.
Tier Not provided
Unknown
While the male-to-female ration of NICCD is roughly equal (73:80) the unequal male-to-female ratio of CTLN2 (2.4:1) suggests that among individuals with biallelic SLC25A13 variants, females are more resistant to the CTLN2 phenotype than males.
Tier 3 View Citations

K Kobayashi, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1181

Unknown
Occasionally a parent of a child with NICCD may have two SLC25A13 pathogenic variants without severe symptoms of CTLN2, a finding in two of 48 fathers and one of 54 mothers tested in 163 Japanese families with NICCD.
Tier 3 View Citations

K Kobayashi, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1181

>= 40 %
One study of Japanese patients found that 17 of 19 patients (89%) with genetically confirmed CTLN2 had hepatic steatosis. Four patients (21%) had been diagnosed with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease before the appearance of neuropsychologic symptoms.
Tier 3 View Citations

Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2016) OMIM: 603471

Relative Risk (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
No information on relative risk was identified.

Expressivity

No significant correlation between SLC25A13 pathogenic variant types and decreased level of hepatic enzyme ASS activity/protein or age of onset in individuals with CTLN2 is observed.
Tier 3 View Citations

K Kobayashi, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1181

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Patient Management

To establish the extent of disease and needs of an individual diagnosed with a phenotype of CTLN2 individuals should undergo an investigation of the carbohydrate, protein, and lipid composition of their diet and a medical genetics consultation.
Tier 4 View Citations

K Kobayashi, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1181

To prevent hyperammonemia a diet rich in protein and lipids and low in carbohydrates is recommended. A low-protein/high-caloric (high carbohydrate) diet is harmful for individuals with CTLN2. A high carbohydrate diet may increase NADH production, disturb urea synthesis, and stimulate the citrate-malate shuttle, resulting in hyperammonemia, fatty liver, and hypertriglyceridemia.
Tier 3 View Citations

K Kobayashi, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1181

Arginine and sodium pyruvate administration may be effective in preventing hyperammonemic crises (by reducing blood ammonia concentrations) and fatty liver, thereby delaying the need for liver transplantation.
Tier 4 View Citations

K Kobayashi, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1181

To date the most successful therapy for symptomatic patients has been liver transplantation which prevents episodic hyperammonemic crises, corrects the metabolic disturbances, and eliminates preferences for protein rich foods. Nearly all individuals with CTLN2 required liver transplantation in the past; however the introduction of arginine and sodium pyruvate has altered the situation.
Tier 3 View Citations

Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2016) OMIM: 603471, K Kobayashi, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1181

No evidence was identified on the effectiveness of dietary treatment prior to the onset of symptoms of CTLN2. A review of CTLN2 case reports identified 77 cases with a mean age of onset was 34.1 years (range 12-60 years). 21 patients were treated with liver transplantation and all showed good prognosis with a survival rate of 100%. 56 patients received conservative treatment (without liver transplantation) and 29 died within a few years of onset (48% survival rate). Survival of patients treated with conservative medical treatment improved to 76.5% when limited to patients treated after 2003 compared to 39.5% survival prior to 2002. This improvement was attributed to the identification of the SLC25A13 gene as the cause of CTLN2 and development of more effective conservative therapy (arginine with carbohydrate-restricted diet). In addition, recent case reports have found that arginine and sodium pyruvate administration combined with a carbohydrate-restricted diet may be effective therapy for CTLN2.
Tier 5 View Citations

Kimura N, et al. (2013) PMID: 24182831

Surveillance

Increases in plasma citrulline concentration and serum pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor (PSTI) suggest onset of CTLN2 and should prompt initiation of treatment. It is recommended that the following be measured every several months:

- Plasma ammonia concentration (especially in the evening or 2 hours after feeding)

- Plasma citrulline concentration

- Serum PSTI concentration.

Tier 3 View Citations

K Kobayashi, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1181

Circumstances to Avoid

Severe brain edema treated with glycerol-containing osmotic agents (the conventional treatment for hyperammonemia and brain edema) has resulted in continued deterioration and is contraindicated in those with CTLN2. Degradation of large amounts of glycerol and fructose generates NADH in the liver cytosol, which may disturb liver function and produce toxic substances. Infusion of high concentration glucose may also exacerbate hyperammonemia. Mannitol infusion appears to be safer. A retrospective study of 3 patients with CTLN2 treated for brain edema at one institute and an additional 11 patients previously reported found that all 12 patients treated with 10% glycerol (with or without 20% mannitol) died due to rapidly deteriorating encephalopathy and brain edema while the 2 patients who received only 20% D-mannitol recovered with the disappearance of brain edema.
Tier 3 View Citations

Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2016) OMIM: 603471, K Kobayashi, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1181

Drinking alcohol can trigger the onset of CTLN2 because alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) generates NADH in the cytosol of the liver.
Tier 4 View Citations

K Kobayashi, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1181

Acetaminophen and rabeprozole may trigger CTLN2.
Tier 3 View Citations

K Kobayashi, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1181

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Nature of Intervention

Identified interventions include liver transplantation and/or dietary therapy, ongoing blood monitoring, and avoidance of possible triggers (e.g., medications and alcohol).
Context: Adult

Chance to Escape Clinical Detection

More than 30% of individuals with CTLN2 have been misdiagnosed initially as having epileptic seizures and/or a psychological disorder (e.g., depression, schizophrenia); others may be diagnosed as having diseases such as hepatoma, pancreatitis, and hyperlipidemia.
Context: Adult
Tier 4 View Citations

K Kobayashi, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1181

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Gene Condition Associations
OMIM Identifier Primary MONDO Identifier Additional MONDO Identifiers

References List

CITRULLINEMIA, TYPE II, ADULT-ONSET; CTLN2. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 603471, (2016) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

K Kobayashi, T Saheki, YZ Song. Citrin Deficiency. (2005) [Updated Jul 31 2014]. In: RA Pagon, MP Adam, HH Ardinger, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1181/

Kimura N, Kubo N, Narumi S, Toyoki Y, Ishido K, Kudo D, Umehara M, Yakoshi Y, Hakamada K. (2013) Liver transplantation versus conservative treatment for adult-onset type II citrullinemia: our experience and a review of the literature. Transplantation proceedings. 45(9):3432-7.

Early Rule-Out Summary

This topic passed the early rule out stage

Findings of Early Rule-Out Assessment

  1. Is there a qualifying resource, such as a practice guideline or systematic review, for the genetic condition?
  2. Does the practice guideline or systematic review indicate that the result is actionable in one or more of the following ways?
  3. a. Patient Management

    b. Surveillance or Screening

    c. Circumstances to Avoid

  4. Is it actionable in an undiagnosed adult with the condition?
  5. Is this condition an important health problem?
  6. Is there at least on known pathogenic variant with at least moderate penetrance (≥40%) or moderate relative risk (≥2) in any population?