Actionability Assertions

Gene Condition (MONDO ID) OMIM ID Final Assertion
HFE hemochromatosis type 1 (0021001) 235200 Definitive Actionability

Actionability Assertion Rationale

  • All experts agreed with upgrading the assertion from the generated assertion of strong to an assertion of definitive. This assertion is based on C282Y homozygous individuals and a definition of clinically apparent disease that includes individuals with presymptomatic biochemical abnormality. This topic has been assigned as assertion of definitive. Thus, this topic will not be updated unless it is renominated because of new evidence which could change the assertion.

Actionability Scores

Outcome / Intervention Pair Severity Likelihood Effectiveness Nature of Intervention Total Score
Clinically apparent disease / Monitoring of ferritin levels 2 2A 3B 3 10AB
Clinically apparent disease / Phlebotomy 2 2A 3B 3 10AB
View scoring key
Domain of Actionability Scoring Metric State of the Knowledgebase
Severity: What is the nature of the threat to health to an individual? 3 = Sudden death as a reasonably possible outcome
2 = Reasonable possibility of death or major morbidity
1 = Modest morbidity
0 = Minimal or no morbidity
N/A
Likelihood: What is the chance that the outcome will occur? 3 = >40% chance
2 = 5%-39% chance
1 = 1%-4% chance
0 = <1% chance
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Effectiveness: What is the effectiveness of a specific intervention in preventing or diminishing the risk of harm? 3 = Highly effective
2 = Moderately effective
1 = Minimally effective
0 = Controversial or unknown effectiveness
IN = Ineffective/No interventiona
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Nature of intervention: How risky, medically burdensome, or intensive is the intervention? 3 = Low risk, or medically acceptable and low intensity
2 = Moderate risk, moderately acceptable or intensive
1 = Greater risk, less acceptable and substantial intensity
0 = High risk, poorly acceptable or intensive
N/A
a Do not score the remaining categories

Prevalence of the Genetic Condition

Hereditary hemochromatosis (HHC) is a common genetic disorder that can lead to iron overload. Estimates of prevalence in the general population vary due to a long pre-clinical period and lack of consistent definitions of "case." The prevalence of hemochromatosis cases defined biochemically (elevated serum iron) will be higher than prevalence of cases based on documented iron overload, with or without clinical signs and symptoms. The prevalence will be lower for cases based on diagnosed disease (cirrhosis, diabetes).

In North America, an estimated 80% of clinically recognized cases are due to homozygosity of the HFE C282Y polymorphism, and an additional 4% are due to compound heterozygosity of the C282Y and H63D polymorphisms. In Caucasians, the prevalence of HFE-associated HHC (HFE-HHC) has been estimated as 1/220-1/250. However, the prevalence of HFE-HHC with clinical manifestations is much lower, estimated as 1/2500.
View Citations

European Association For The Study Of The Liver, et al. (2010) PMID: 20471131, Bacon BR, et al. (2011) PMID: 21452290, Whitlock EP, et al. (2006) PMID: 16880463, Hanson EH, et al. (2001) PMID: 11479183

Clinical Features (Signs / symptoms)

HHC is a disorder of iron metabolism characterized by an abnormally high absorption of dietary iron by the gastrointestinal mucosa. Iron overload may be detected biochemically as increased transferrin-iron saturation and increased serum ferritin concentrations. Clinical manifestations are due to excess iron which can be deposited in the liver, pancreas, heart joints, pituitary gland, skin, and testes. The rate of iron accumulation and the frequency and severity of clinical symptoms can vary markedly. Early symptoms include fatigue, weakness, joint pain, palpitations, abdominal pain, and weight loss. If left untreated, disease progression can lead to hyperpigmentation of the skin, arthritis, cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus, chronic abdominal pain, severe fatigue, hypopituitarism, hypogonadism, cardiomyopathy, primary liver cancer, or an increased risk of certain bacterial infections.
View Citations

Hanson EH, et al. (2001) PMID: 11479183, European Association For The Study Of The Liver, et al. (2010) PMID: 20471131, R Seckington, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1440

Natural History (Important subgroups & survival / recovery)

Symptoms of HHC typically appear between ages 40 and 60 in males and after menopause in females. The prevalence of both iron overload and clinical disease is generally higher in males than females. Presenting signs and symptoms of HHC also vary by sex, with women more likely to present with fatigue, arthralgia, and pigmentation changes and men presenting more often with symptoms of liver disease. Symptoms and disease complications increase with age. With disease progression, liver cirrhosis may develop and may be complicated by portal hypertension, hepatocellular carcinoma, and end-stage liver disease. By the time cirrhosis is recognized, approximately 50% have diabetes mellitus and 15% have congestive heart failure or arrhythmias. Patients diagnosed and treated prior to the development of cirrhosis have a normal life expectancy. Death most often occurs due to cirrhosis, primary liver cancer, diabetes, and cardiomyopathy. On the basis of clinically diagnosed or compatible disease age-adjusted mortality rates for hemochromatosis deaths in the US was 1.8 per million in 1992. These rates were about twice as high in males as in females, and in white persons as in nonwhite persons.

Not all cases of C282Y homozygotes or have iron overload and not all cases that have iron overload have iron deposits in tissues or organs to the degree that damage occurs. Additionally, no test can predict whether a C282Y homozygote will develop clinical disease manifestations. For cases of C282Y/H63D compound heterozygosity, few develop clinical manifestations, but among those who do, many have a complicating factor (e.g., fatty liver, viral hepatitis) that leads to iron overload.
View Citations

R Seckington, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1440, European Association For The Study Of The Liver, et al. (2010) PMID: 20471131, Bacon BR, et al. (2011) PMID: 21452290, Whitlock EP, et al. (2006) PMID: 16880463

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Recessive

Prevalence of Genetic Variants

>1-2 in 100
The allelic frequency of the C282Y variant in the general population (worldwide) has been estimated as 6.2%. Based on Hardy-Weinberg, the frequency of C282Y homozygotes is estimated as 0.38%. However, reported frequencies (worldwide) of homozygotes are higher at 0.41%. The US has an estimated prevalence of 0.44%. US prevalence estimates are lower among Hispanic persons (0.027%), Asian Americans (<0.001%), Pacific Islanders (0.012%), and black persons (0.014%).

The carrier frequency of the H63D mutations is estimated as 22% in Europe and 23% in North America. C282Y/H63D compound heterozygosity of has a frequency of 2% in the European general population and in 2% in the for North America.
Tier 1 View Citations

European Association For The Study Of The Liver, et al. (2010) PMID: 20471131, Whitlock EP, et al. (2006) PMID: 16880463, Hanson EH, et al. (2001) PMID: 11479183

Penetrance (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

>= 40 %
Penetrance is incomplete and is generally higher in males than females. Differences in inclusion criteria and the definition of biochemical and disease penetrance have produced a range of estimates for the penetrance of C282Y homozygosity. A summary of penetrance estimates from two meta-analysis are presented:

Elevated transferrin saturation: Males = 75-94%, Females = 40-94%Increased serum ferritin: Males = 32-76%, Females = 26-58%Excess liver iron: Males = 42%, Females = 19%, All = 24%Diabetes: All = 0-5.6%Liver fibrosis: Males = 18%, Females = 5%, All = 6%Cirrhosis: Males = 6%, Females = 2%, All = 1.4%
Tier 1 View Citations

European Association For The Study Of The Liver, et al. (2010) PMID: 20471131, Whitlock EP, et al. (2006) PMID: 16880463, Gallego CJ, et al. (2015) PMID: 26365338

A recent study has published penetrance estimates from the eMERGE Network:C282Y homozygotes: Elevated transferrin saturation: Males = 100%, Females = 50%Increased serum ferritin: Males = 78%, Females = 31%Diabetes: Males = 45%, Females = 12%Cirrhosis: Males = 5%, Females = 3%C282Y/H63D compound heterozygotes:Elevated transferrin saturation: Males = 38%, Females = 38%Increased serum ferritin: Males = 33%, Females = 30%Diabetes: Males = 28%, Females = 20%Cirrhosis: Males = 5%, Females = 5%
Tier 5 View Citations

Gallego CJ, et al. (2015) PMID: 26365338

Unknown
Tier Not provided

Relative Risk (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

>3
A meta-analysis of 202 case-control studies indicated an increased risk for several outcomes among clinically ascertained (i.e. cases defined by disease status related to an organ):

C282Y homozygotes compared to controls:

• Liver disease: OR=3.9 (99% CI: 1.9-8.1)

• Hepatocellular carcinoma: OR=11 (99% CI: 3.7-34)

• Hepatitis C: OR=4.1 (99% CI: 1.2-14)

• Nonalcoholic steahohepatitis: OR=10 (99% CI: 2.1-53)

• Porphyria cutanea tarda: OR=48 (99% CI: 24-95).

• Diabetes mellitus: OR=3.4 (99% CI: 1.1-11; among North Europeans only).

C282Y/H63D compound heterozygotes compared to controls:

• Porphyria cutanea tarda: OR=8.1 (99% CI: 3.9-17).

Tier 1 View Citations

Ellervik C, et al. (2007) PMID: 17828789

Expressivity

The phenotypic expression of HFE-HHC is highly variable, including the rate of iron accumulation and the frequency and severity of clinical outcomes.
Tier 3 View Citations

Hanson EH, et al. (2001) PMID: 11479183

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Patient Management

To establish the extent of disease, the following evaluations are recommended at the initial diagnosis of an individual determined to be a C282Y homozygote:

• Serum ferritin concentrations should be measured to establish disease status and prognosis.

• MRI to estimate parenchymal iron content, including the liver and possibly the heart

• When serum ferritin and liver enzyme levels are abnormal, liver biopsy can establish or exclude cirrhosis.

• Consultation with a medical geneticist and/or genetic counselor.

Tier 3 View Citations

R Seckington, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1440

Surveillance

C282Y homozygotes without evidence for iron overload could be monitored annually and treatment instituted when the ferritin rises above normal. Phlebotomy is the mainstay of treatment once iron overload is present. There is little evidence to guide when to initiate phlebotomy, though the threshold is typically any ferritin level above the normal range. Though there is no survival data specific to homozygous C282Y, phlebotomy has been shown to be effective in clinically diagnosed hemochromatosis: 5-year survival of 93% for adequately phlebotomized patients compared to 48% for inadequately phlebotomized patients (10-year survival of 78% and 32%, respectively). Survival of treated patients without cirrhosis and diabetes has been found to be equivalent to that of the normal population, whereas those with these complications have a significantly reduced survival, indicating the benefits of the early initiation of iron removal.
Tier 2 View Citations

European Association For The Study Of The Liver, et al. (2010) PMID: 20471131

Circumstances to Avoid

Medicinal iron, mineral supplements, excess vitamin C, uncooked seafood, and alcohol consumption in those with hepatic involvement.
Tier 3 View Citations

R Seckington, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1440

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Nature of Intervention

Surveillance to monitor serum iron levels is noninvasive and likely well tolerated in patients. Following initial diagnosis and/or presentation of symptoms, weekly or biweekly phlebotomy may be needed to reduce serum ferritin concentration to below 50ng/mL. However, maintenance therapy to keep serum ferritin concentrations below 50ng/mL typically occurs every 3 to 4 months for men and once or twice a year for women.
Context: Adult

Chance to Escape Clinical Detection

Given that the early symptoms of HFE-HHC (fatigue, joint pain, etc.) are nonspecific, HFE-HHC is often not diagnosed at the early stages. Even advanced complications (cardiomyopathy, liver cancer, etc.) are also common primary disorders, and thus iron overload can be missed unless it is screened for specifically.
Context: Adult
View Citations

Hanson EH, et al. (2001) PMID: 11479183

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Gene Condition Associations
OMIM Identifier Primary MONDO Identifier Additional MONDO Identifiers
HFE 235200 0021001

References List

Bacon BR, Adams PC, Kowdley KV, Powell LW, Tavill AS. (2011) Diagnosis and management of hemochromatosis: 2011 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.). 54(1):328-43.

Ellervik C, Birgens H, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. (2007) Hemochromatosis genotypes and risk of 31 disease endpoints: meta-analyses including 66,000 cases and 226,000 controls. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.). 46(4):1071-80.

European Association For The Study Of The Liver. (2010) EASL clinical practice guidelines for HFE hemochromatosis. Journal of hepatology. 53(1):3-22.

Gallego CJ, Burt A, Sundaresan AS, Ye Z, Shaw C, Crosslin DR, Crane PK, Fullerton SM, Hansen K, Carrell D, Kuivaniemi H, Derr K, de Andrade M, McCarty CA, Kitchner TE, Ragon BK, Stallings SC, Papa G, Bochenek J, Smith ME, Aufox SA, Pacheco JA, Patel V, Friesema EM, Erwin AL, Gottesman O, Gerhard GS, Ritchie M, Motulsky AG, Kullo IJ, Larson EB, Tromp G, Brilliant MH, Bottinger E, Denny JC, Roden DM, Williams MS, Jarvik GP. (2015) Penetrance of Hemochromatosis in HFE Genotypes Resulting in p.Cys282Tyr and p.[Cys282Tyr];[His63Asp] in the eMERGE Network. American journal of human genetics. 97(4):512-20.

Hanson EH, Imperatore G, Burke W. (2001) HFE gene and hereditary hemochromatosis: a HuGE review. Human Genome Epidemiology. American journal of epidemiology. 154(3):193-206.

R Seckington, L Powell. HFE-Associated Hereditary Hemochromatosis. (2000) [Updated Sep 17 2015]. In: RA Pagon, MP Adam, HH Ardinger, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1440/

Whitlock EP, Garlitz BA, Harris EL, Beil TL, Smith PR. (2006) Screening for hereditary hemochromatosis: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of internal medicine. 145(3):209-23.

Early Rule-Out Summary

This topic passed the early rule out stage

Findings of Early Rule-Out Assessment

  1. Is there a qualifying resource, such as a practice guideline or systematic review, for the genetic condition?
  2. Does the practice guideline or systematic review indicate that the result is actionable in one or more of the following ways?
  3. a. Patient Management

    b. Surveillance or Screening

    c. Circumstances to Avoid

  4. Is it actionable in an undiagnosed adult with the condition?
  5. Is this condition an important health problem?
  6. Is there at least on known pathogenic variant with at least moderate penetrance (≥40%) or moderate relative risk (≥2) in any population?