Actionability Assertions

Gene Condition (MONDO ID) OMIM ID Final Assertion
MEFV familial Mediterranean fever, autosomal dominant (0007601) 134610 Assertion Pending

Actionability Assertion Rationale

  • This topic was initially scored prior to development of the process for making actionability assertions. The Actionability Working Group decided to defer making an assertion until after the topic could be reviewed through the update process.

Actionability Scores

Outcome / Intervention Pair Severity Likelihood Effectiveness Nature of Intervention Total Score
Recurrent serositis / Colchicine 1 0D 3C 2 6DC
Amyloidosis / Colchicine 1 0D 3C 2 6DC
Joint problems / Colchicine 1 0D 3C 2 6DC
View scoring key
Domain of Actionability Scoring Metric State of the Knowledgebase
Severity: What is the nature of the threat to health to an individual? 3 = Sudden death as a reasonably possible outcome
2 = Reasonable possibility of death or major morbidity
1 = Modest morbidity
0 = Minimal or no morbidity
N/A
Likelihood: What is the chance that the outcome will occur? 3 = >40% chance
2 = 5%-39% chance
1 = 1%-4% chance
0 = <1% chance
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Effectiveness: What is the effectiveness of a specific intervention in preventing or diminishing the risk of harm? 3 = Highly effective
2 = Moderately effective
1 = Minimally effective
0 = Controversial or unknown effectiveness
IN = Ineffective/No interventiona
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Nature of intervention: How risky, medically burdensome, or intensive is the intervention? 3 = Low risk, or medically acceptable and low intensity
2 = Moderate risk, moderately acceptable or intensive
1 = Greater risk, less acceptable and substantial intensity
0 = High risk, poorly acceptable or intensive
N/A
a Do not score the remaining categories

Prevalence of the Genetic Condition

Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) predominantly affects populations living in the southeastern Mediterranean region. Populations having a high prevalence (1/200-1/1000) include non-Ashkenazi Jews, Armenians, Turks, and Arabs. FMF is also seen in many other countries, although in much lower numbers. However, the proportion of cases attributed to a single MEFV pathogenic variant is unknown.
View Citations

Giancane G, et al. (2015) PMID: 25628446, Witsch-Baumgartner M, et al. (2015) PMID: 25407006, Familial Mediterranean fever. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 342., M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

Clinical Features (Signs / symptoms)

FMF is an autoinflammatory fever syndrome characterized by recurrent short episodes of inflammation and serositis including fever, peritonitis, synovitis, pleuritic, and, rarely, pericarditis and meningitis. Attacks can vary in frequency (as often as once a week or every few years), typically last 1-4 days, and resolve spontaneously. Mild symptoms (myalgia, headache, nausea, dyspnea, arthralgia, low back pain, asthenia and anxiety) precede attacks and last about 17 hours in approximately 50% of patients. Attacks manifest as fever, diffuse or localized abdominal pain, constipation or diarrhea, arthralgias (in large joints), arthritis (in upper/lower limb/knee joints) chest pain caused by pleuritis and/or pericarditis, and skin eruption. Joint attacks can result in severe damage to the joint and permanent deformity may require joint replacement. The main long-term complication is amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis, which is common in untreated individuals, can lead to renal failure, and has a poor prognosis. Untreated individuals with FMF, especially those with multiple attacks and/or amyloidosis, are at higher risk for infertility.

Heterozygotes are typically asymptomatic, though some manifest a spectrum of findings from classic to mild FMF. Clinical features in individuals with a single pathogenic MEFV mutation are typically milder and the attacks shorter and less frequent than patients with two MEFV mutations. Most patients have an incomplete abdominal attack as the major criterion of the disease. Patients manifest mainly fever and abdominal symptoms.
View Citations

Giancane G, et al. (2015) PMID: 25628446, Familial Mediterranean fever. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 342., M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

Natural History (Important subgroups & survival / recovery)

Younger children with a single pathogenic variant and symptoms of recurrent autoinflammatory disorder have a milder disease course compared to individuals with biallelic pathogenic variations, with no major differences in presenting signs. However, clinical signs have been reported to completely disappear at puberty in some cases, indicating that a single pathogenic variant may not necessarily predict lifelong illness.
View Citations

M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Dominant

FMF is usually inherited in an autosomal recessive manner, although recent studies have suggested that some heterozygotes manifest a spectrum of findings from classic to mild FMF.

View Citations

M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

Prevalence of Genetic Variants

Unknown
No information on the frequency of MEFV mutations in the general population was identified.

The pathogenic variant A2080G is found in more than 90% of affected Jewish persons of North African origin.
Tier 4 View Citations

M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

About 85% of patients of Mediterranean origin that meet clinical criteria have a mutation in both copies of the MEFV gene, with only one mutation identified in about 20% of affected cases.
Tier 3 View Citations

Witsch-Baumgartner M, et al. (2015) PMID: 25407006

Penetrance (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
Information on the penetrance among patients who have a single pathogenic MEFV variant was not identified.
Tier Not provided

Relative Risk (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
Information on relative risk was not identified.

Expressivity

Symptoms and severity vary among affected individuals, even among members of the same family suggesting that manifestations are also influenced by other genes and/or environmental factors.
Tier 4 View Citations

M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Patient Management

To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with FMF, the following evaluations are recommended:

• Physical examination to assess joint problems

• Urinalysis for the presence of protein. If proteinuria is found, further evaluation is required, including 24-hour urinary protein assay and renal function tests, and also, if indicated, rectal biopsy for the presence of amyloid.

• Medical genetics consultation.

Tier 4 View Citations

M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

The presence of a single MEFV pathogenic variant together with clinical symptoms is sufficient to warrant the initiation of a trial of colchicine. Therefore, manifesting heterozygotes should be treated. However, since the natural history and outcome for persons with FMF who are heterozygous for a single MEFV pathogenic variant are unknown, there is no recommendation of lifelong treatment with colchicine for this group. A report of clinical diagnosed FMF patients with a single MEFV variation indicated that 21 of 25 (84%) either completely or partially responded to colchicine therapy. A second report of 94 heterozygous patients with recurrent fever indicated that 82% required colchicine treatment, which was effective in over 90%.
Tier 3 View Citations

M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

Surveillance

No recommendations specific to surveillance in heterozygous patients were identified. The following recommendations are made generally about FMF patients.

All individuals with FMF, including those not currently being treated, those being treated with colchicine, and those receiving medication other than colchicine should undergo an annual physical examination, a urine spot test for protein, and an evaluation for hematuria.
Tier 3 View Citations

M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

Monitoring of acute-phase reactants (ESR and fibrinogen levels) at regular intervals during attack-free periods is recommended, particularly in those with the M694V variant.
Tier 3 View Citations

M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

Circumstances to Avoid

A single report has suggested that cisplatin worsens symptoms of FMF.
Tier 3 View Citations

M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

Cyclosporin appears to adversely affect renal transplant graft survival in individuals with FMF. It has also been reported to trigger FMF attacks, which responded well to colchicine in a previously asymptomatic individual with myelodysplastic syndrome who was heterozygous for the MEFV pathogenic variant M694I.
Tier 3 View Citations

M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Nature of Intervention

Colchicine toxicity is a serious complication that should be given adequate consideration and be prevented. Colchicine is an alkaloid with a narrow therapeutic range. High concentrations may cause serious toxicity that can be life threatening. Complications of cholchicine use occasionally include myopathy and toxic epidermal necrolysis-like reaction. Colchicine treatment may induce oligospermia/azoospermia. Other identified interventions include blood and urine tests, associated with low burden and risk.
Context: Adult
View Citations

M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227, Ozen S, et al. (2016) PMID: 26802180

Chance to Escape Clinical Detection

Symptoms associated with FMF (e.g., fever, pain) are not specific and may not direct the correct diagnosis.
Context: Adult

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Gene Condition Associations
OMIM Identifier Primary MONDO Identifier Additional MONDO Identifiers
MEFV 134610 0007601

References List

Familial Mediterranean fever. Orphanet encyclopedia, http://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=en&Expert=342

Giancane G, Ter Haar NM, Wulffraat N, Vastert SJ, Barron K, Hentgen V, Kallinich T, Ozdogan H, Anton J, Brogan P, Cantarini L, Frenkel J, Galeotti C, Gattorno M, Grateau G, Hofer M, Kone-Paut I, Kuemmerle-Deschner J, Lachmann HJ, Simon A, Demirkaya E, Feldman B, Uziel Y, Ozen S. (2015) Evidence-based recommendations for genetic diagnosis of familial Mediterranean fever. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 74(4):635-41.

M Shohat. Familial Mediterranean Fever. (2000) [Updated Dec 15 2016]. In: RA Pagon, MP Adam, HH Ardinger, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1227/

Ozen S, Demirkaya E, Erer B, Livneh A, Ben-Chetrit E, Giancane G, Ozdogan H, Abu I, Gattorno M, Hawkins PN, Yuce S, Kallinich T, Bilginer Y, Kastner D, Carmona L. (2016) EULAR recommendations for the management of familial Mediterranean fever. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 75(4):644-51.

Witsch-Baumgartner M, Touitou I. (2015) Clinical utility gene card for: prototypic hereditary recurrent fever syndromes (monogenic autoinflammatory syndromes). European journal of human genetics : EJHG. 23(8).

Early Rule-Out Summary

This topic passed the early rule out stage

Findings of Early Rule-Out Assessment

  1. Is there a qualifying resource, such as a practice guideline or systematic review, for the genetic condition?
  2. Does the practice guideline or systematic review indicate that the result is actionable in one or more of the following ways?
  3. a. Patient Management

    b. Surveillance or Screening

    c. Circumstances to Avoid

  4. Is it actionable in an undiagnosed adult with the condition?
  5. Is this condition an important health problem?
  6. Is there at least on known pathogenic variant with at least moderate penetrance (≥40%) or moderate relative risk (≥2) in any population?