Actionability Assertions

Gene Condition (MONDO ID) OMIM ID Final Assertion
MEFV autosomal recessive familial Mediterranean fever (0009572) 249100 Assertion Pending

Actionability Assertion Rationale

  • This topic was initially scored prior to development of the process for making actionability assertions. The Actionability Working Group decided to defer making an assertion until after the topic could be reviewed through the update process.

Actionability Scores

Outcome / Intervention Pair Severity Likelihood Effectiveness Nature of Intervention Total Score
Recurrent serositis / Colchicine 2 3C 3A 2 10CA
Amyloidosis / Colchicine 2 2C 3B 2 9CB
Joint problems / Colchicine 2 3C 3A 2 10CA
View scoring key
Domain of Actionability Scoring Metric State of the Knowledgebase
Severity: What is the nature of the threat to health to an individual? 3 = Sudden death as a reasonably possible outcome
2 = Reasonable possibility of death or major morbidity
1 = Modest morbidity
0 = Minimal or no morbidity
N/A
Likelihood: What is the chance that the outcome will occur? 3 = >40% chance
2 = 5%-39% chance
1 = 1%-4% chance
0 = <1% chance
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Effectiveness: What is the effectiveness of a specific intervention in preventing or diminishing the risk of harm? 3 = Highly effective
2 = Moderately effective
1 = Minimally effective
0 = Controversial or unknown effectiveness
IN = Ineffective/No interventiona
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Nature of intervention: How risky, medically burdensome, or intensive is the intervention? 3 = Low risk, or medically acceptable and low intensity
2 = Moderate risk, moderately acceptable or intensive
1 = Greater risk, less acceptable and substantial intensity
0 = High risk, poorly acceptable or intensive
N/A
a Do not score the remaining categories

Prevalence of the Genetic Condition

Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) predominantly affects populations living in the southeastern Mediterranean region. Populations having a high prevalence (1/200-1/1000) include non-Ashkenazi Jews, Armenians, Turks, and Arabs. FMF is also seen in many other countries, although in much lower numbers.
View Citations

Giancane G, et al. (2015) PMID: 25628446, Witsch-Baumgartner M, et al. (2015) PMID: 25407006, Familial Mediterranean fever. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 342., Wu B, et al. (2015) PMID: 25791871, M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

Clinical Features (Signs / symptoms)

FMF is an autoinflammatory fever syndrome characterized by recurrent short episodes of inflammation and serositis including fever, peritonitis, synovitis, pleuritic, and, rarely, pericarditis and meningitis. Attacks can vary in frequency (as often as once a week or every few years), typically last 1-4 days, and resolve spontaneously. Mild symptoms (myalgia, headache, nausea, dyspnea, arthralgia, low back pain, asthenia and anxiety) precede attacks and last about 17 hours in approximately 50% of patients. Attacks manifest as fever, diffuse or localized abdominal pain, constipation or diarrhea, arthralgias (in large joints), arthritis (in upper/lower limb/knee joints) chest pain caused by pleuritis and/or pericarditis, and skin eruption. Joint attacks can result in severe damage to the joint and permanent deformity may require joint replacement. The main long-term complication is amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis, which is common in untreated individuals, can lead to renal failure, and has a poor prognosis. Untreated individuals with FMF, especially those with multiple attacks and/or amyloidosis, are at higher risk for infertility.
View Citations

Giancane G, et al. (2015) PMID: 25628446, Familial Mediterranean fever. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 342., Wu B, et al. (2015) PMID: 25791871, M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

Natural History (Important subgroups & survival / recovery)

Disease onset usually occurs before the age of 30 (approximately 90% before age 20) with an earlier onset corresponding to a more severe phenotype. Recurrent fever manifests during early childhood and may be the only manifestation. A Type 2 version of FMF has been described that is characterized by amyloidosis as the first clinical manifestation in an otherwise asymptomatic individual. However, some experts believe these cases are previously undiagnosed, milder forms of the disorder. In addition, a Type 3 phenotype has been recently described in which individuals with two pathogenic variants do not express any clinical manifestations. There are no long-term follow-up studies of patients with this phenotype, and thus their outcome cannot be predicted (e.g., development of secondary amyloidosis). Furthermore, no data exist to know whether these individuals have elevated acute phase reactants despite the lack of clinical manifestations.

Presentation of clinical features, particularly amyloidosis, can vary across genotypes, ethnicities, and geographical region. Patients who are homozygous for the M694V variant (or other pathogenic variants at position 680-694 on exon 10) or compound heterozygous with a M694V (or other pathogenic variant at position 680-694 on exon 10) and other pathogenic variant typically have a more severe phenotype, with an earlier age of onset and higher frequencies of arthritis and arthralgia than persons who are homozygous or compound heterozygous for other pathogenic variants. M694V mutations are also the most frequency genotype associated with amyloidosis. The association between M694V homozygosity and amyloidosis is less significant among Turkish patients compared to Armenians, Israelis, and Arabians. Amyloidosis is particularly common in the Jewish population of North African origin. In untreated individuals, amyloidosis can occur in 60% of individuals of Turkish heritage and in up to 75% of North African Jews. The age of onset of FMF attacks appears to be earlier in persons with amyloidosis than in those without amyloidosis. FMF-related manifestations of chest pain, arthritis, and erysipelas-erythema are more common in those with amyloidosis. Long periods between disease onset and diagnosis are associated with a high risk of developing amyloidosis. Patients in Western countries are less likely to develop amyloidosis, despite their ethnicities or genotype.
View Citations

Giancane G, et al. (2015) PMID: 25628446, Witsch-Baumgartner M, et al. (2015) PMID: 25407006, Familial Mediterranean fever. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 342., Wu B, et al. (2015) PMID: 25791871, M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227, Hentgen V, et al. (2013) PMID: 23742958

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Recessive

Prevalence of Genetic Variants

Unknown
No information on the frequency of MEFV mutations in the general population was identified. Pathogenic variants in MEFV are detected in more than 90% of all cases of FMF. The pathogenic variant M694V is found in more than 90% of affected Jewish persons of North African origin.
Tier 4 View Citations

M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

About 85% of patients of Mediterranean origin that meet clinical criteria have a mutation in both copies of the MEFV gene, with only one mutation identified in about 20% of affected cases.
Tier 3 View Citations

Witsch-Baumgartner M, et al. (2015) PMID: 25407006

Penetrance (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

>= 40 %
Information on penetrance in a population defined by genotype alone was not identified. The following prevalence figures are based on individuals with a clinical diagnosis of FMF:Abdominal attacks = 90%

Articular attacks = 75%

Cutaneous involvement = 7-40%

Protracted arthritic attacks = 5%

Prodrome = 50%

Pleural attacks = 45%.
Tier 4 View Citations

Familial Mediterranean fever. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 342., M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

Genetic and non-genetic factors appear to affect the rates of amyloidosis in FMF. A study of patients from 14 countries found amyloidosis in 260/2277 (11.4%) patients. The country of recruitment was the most important determinant of risk for development of amyloidosis, followed by the presence of homozygous M694V variants in Armenian, Israelis and Arabian patients. However, another study of 100 Armenian FMF patients living in the USA found no cases of amyloidosis, although M694V was demonstrated to be the most frequent MEFV mutation.
Tier 3 View Citations

M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

Unknown
Tier Not provided
Unknown
Tier Not provided
Unknown
Tier Not provided

Relative Risk (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
Information on relative risk was not identified.

Expressivity

Symptoms and severity vary among affected individuals, even among members of the same family suggesting that manifestations are also influenced by other genes and/or environmental factors.
Tier 4 View Citations

M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Patient Management

To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with FMF, the following evaluations are recommended:

• Physical examination to assess joint problems

• Urinalysis for the presence of protein. If proteinuria is found, further evaluation is required, including 24-hour urinary protein assay and renal function tests, and also, if indicated, rectal biopsy for the presence of amyloid.

• Medical genetics consultation.

Tier 4 View Citations

M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

Treatment with colchicine should be started as soon as a clinical diagnosis is made. Colchicine is very efficacious in preventing FMF attacks and associated amyloidosis. A systematic review on treatment of FMF identified three studies on the prophylactic use of colchicine (n=48). Overall, colchicine was found to consistently reduce the rate and severity of FMF attacks; however, these studies were found to be of low quality. In the first study (n=11), during the course of colchicine, compared to the course of placebo, patients reported fewer attacks (7 vs. 38 attacks, respectively; p<0.001) and milder attacks (p<0.002). In the second study (n=22), patients reported fewer attacks when on colchicine compared to receiving placebo (mean of 1.15 vs 5.25 per patient, respectively; p<0.01) during the first 2 months of treatment, though the risk ratio was not significant (risk ratio: 0.78 (95% CI: 0.49 to 1.23)). A third study (n=15), patients reported fewer attacks on colchicine compared to placebo (5 vs. 59 attacks, respectively; p<0. 002) with a risk ratio of 0.21 (95% CI: 0.05 to 0.95).
Tier 1 View Citations

Wu B, et al. (2015) PMID: 25791871, Ozen S, et al. (2016) PMID: 26802180

In addition, colchicine is the only current treatment for the prevention of secondary amyloidosis in FMF. A longitudinal study indicated that of the 960 patients on colchicine who had no evidence of amyloidosis, only 4 who adhered to the prophylactic schedule developed proteinuria, while 16 of the 54 who admitted non-compliance developed proteinuria.
Tier 2 View Citations

Hentgen V, et al. (2013) PMID: 23742958

Surveillance

Individuals homozygous for M694V who do not report symptoms, should be evaluated and followed closely in order to consider therapy.
Tier 2 View Citations

Giancane G, et al. (2015) PMID: 25628446

For individuals with two pathogenic mutations for FMF who do not report symptoms, if there are risk factors for AA amyloidosis (e.g., country, family history, and persistently elevated inflammatory markers (particularly serum amyloid A protein)), close follow-up should be started and treatment considered.
Tier 2 View Citations

Giancane G, et al. (2015) PMID: 25628446

All individuals with FMF, including those not currently being treated, those being treated with colchicine, and those receiving medication other than colchicine should undergo an annual physical examination, a urine spot test for protein, and an evaluation for hematuria.
Tier 3 View Citations

M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

Monitoring of acute-phase reactants (ESR and fibrinogen levels) at regular intervals during attack-free periods is recommended, particularly in those with the M694V variant.
Tier 3 View Citations

M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

Circumstances to Avoid

A single report has suggested that cisplatin worsens symptoms of FMF.
Tier 3 View Citations

M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

Cyclosporin appears to adversely affect renal transplant graft survival in individuals with FMF. It has also been reported to trigger FMF attacks, which responded well to colchicine in a previously asymptomatic individual with myelodysplastic syndrome who was heterozygous for the MEFV pathogenic variant M694I.
Tier 3 View Citations

M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Nature of Intervention

Colchicine toxicity is a serious complication that should be given adequate consideration and be prevented. Colchicine is an alkaloid with a narrow therapeutic range. High concentrations may cause serious toxicity that can be life threatening. Complications of colchicine use occasionally include myopathy and toxic epidermal necrolysis-like reaction. Colchicine treatment may induce oligospermia/azoospermia. Other identified interventions include blood and urine tests, associated with low burden and risk.
Context: Adult
View Citations

M Shohat, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1227, Hentgen V, et al. (2013) PMID: 23742958, Ozen S, et al. (2016) PMID: 26802180

Chance to Escape Clinical Detection

Symptoms associated with FMF (e.g., fever, pain) are not specific and may not direct the correct diagnosis.
Context: Adult

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Gene Condition Associations
OMIM Identifier Primary MONDO Identifier Additional MONDO Identifiers
MEFV 249100 0009572

References List

Familial Mediterranean fever. Orphanet encyclopedia, http://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=en&Expert=342

Giancane G, Ter Haar NM, Wulffraat N, Vastert SJ, Barron K, Hentgen V, Kallinich T, Ozdogan H, Anton J, Brogan P, Cantarini L, Frenkel J, Galeotti C, Gattorno M, Grateau G, Hofer M, Kone-Paut I, Kuemmerle-Deschner J, Lachmann HJ, Simon A, Demirkaya E, Feldman B, Uziel Y, Ozen S. (2015) Evidence-based recommendations for genetic diagnosis of familial Mediterranean fever. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 74(4):635-41.

Hentgen V, Grateau G, Kone-Paut I, Livneh A, Padeh S, Rozenbaum M, Amselem S, Gershoni-Baruch R, Touitou I, Ben-Chetrit E. (2013) Evidence-based recommendations for the practical management of Familial Mediterranean Fever. Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism. 43(3):387-91.

M Shohat. Familial Mediterranean Fever. (2000) [Updated Dec 15 2016]. In: RA Pagon, MP Adam, HH Ardinger, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1227/

Ozen S, Demirkaya E, Erer B, Livneh A, Ben-Chetrit E, Giancane G, Ozdogan H, Abu I, Gattorno M, Hawkins PN, Yuce S, Kallinich T, Bilginer Y, Kastner D, Carmona L. (2016) EULAR recommendations for the management of familial Mediterranean fever. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 75(4):644-51.

Witsch-Baumgartner M, Touitou I. (2015) Clinical utility gene card for: prototypic hereditary recurrent fever syndromes (monogenic autoinflammatory syndromes). European journal of human genetics : EJHG. 23(8).

Wu B, Xu T, Li Y, Yin X. (2015) Interventions for reducing inflammation in familial Mediterranean fever. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. CD010893.

Early Rule-Out Summary

This topic passed the early rule out stage

Findings of Early Rule-Out Assessment

  1. Is there a qualifying resource, such as a practice guideline or systematic review, for the genetic condition?
  2. Does the practice guideline or systematic review indicate that the result is actionable in one or more of the following ways?
  3. a. Patient Management

    b. Surveillance or Screening

    c. Circumstances to Avoid

  4. Is it actionable in an undiagnosed adult with the condition?
  5. Is this condition an important health problem?
  6. Is there at least on known pathogenic variant with at least moderate penetrance (≥40%) or moderate relative risk (≥2) in any population?