Actionability Assertions

Gene Condition (MONDO ID) OMIM ID Final Assertion
NOTCH3 cerebral arteriopathy, autosomal dominant, with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy, type 1 (0000914) 125310 Limited Actionability

Actionability Assertion Rationale

  • The experts were unanimous in asserting limited actionability given available intervention is not effective in reducing the risk for stroke in individuals with CADASIL. There is limited evidence that avoidance of thrombolysis or anti-platelet therapies is effective in reducing secondary iatrogenic harm in the acute setting of CADASIL.

Actionability Scores

Outcome / Intervention Pair Severity Likelihood Effectiveness Nature of Intervention Total Score
Morbidity and mortality from stroke / Specialist care and management, including monitoring and controlling vascular risk factors 2 2A 1D 3 8AD
View scoring key
Domain of Actionability Scoring Metric State of the Knowledgebase
Severity: What is the nature of the threat to health to an individual? 3 = Sudden death as a reasonably possible outcome
2 = Reasonable possibility of death or major morbidity
1 = Modest morbidity
0 = Minimal or no morbidity
N/A
Likelihood: What is the chance that the outcome will occur? 3 = >40% chance
2 = 5%-39% chance
1 = 1%-4% chance
0 = <1% chance
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Effectiveness: What is the effectiveness of a specific intervention in preventing or diminishing the risk of harm? 3 = Highly effective
2 = Moderately effective
1 = Minimally effective
0 = Controversial or unknown effectiveness
IN = Ineffective/No interventiona
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Nature of intervention: How risky, medically burdensome, or intensive is the intervention? 3 = Low risk, or medically acceptable and low intensity
2 = Moderate risk, moderately acceptable or intensive
1 = Greater risk, less acceptable and substantial intensity
0 = High risk, poorly acceptable or intensive
N/A
a Do not score the remaining categories

Prevalence of the Genetic Condition

The exact prevalence of cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is not known and is probably underdiagnosed. Multiple small and national registries have estimated the minimum prevalence between 2-5 per 100,000. Epidemiological data on the prevalence of CADASIL in different racial and ethnic groups are incomplete. Data on individuals of European and Asian ancestry is more common, whereas identification of CADASIL in people of African ancestry remains rare. The differences in disease prevalence may be accounted for, in part, by underreporting as a result of resource limitations, under-recognition, and undertesting.

Based on a recent report that NOTCH3 pathogenic variants in the general population is 100-fold higher than current estimates of the minimum prevalence of CADASIL, CADASIL is thought to be much more prevalent than previously suspected.
View Citations

J Rutten, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1500, CADASIL. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 136., Li Y, et al. (2015) PMID: 25734590, Mancuso M, et al. (2020) PMID: 32196841

Clinical Features (Signs / symptoms)

CADASIL is a disease of the small to medium-sized arteries, mainly affecting the brain. Classically, it is characterized by mid-adult onset of recurrent ischemic stroke (related to small vessel pathology), cognitive decline progressing to dementia, migraine with aura, mood disturbances/psychiatric disorders (variable, from personality changes to severe depression), and apathy (may be independent of depression). Less common signs include reversible acute encephalopathy, epilepsy, motor disability, and gait disorders. Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) can occur. Neuropsychiatric complications such as adjustment disorders, dysthymia, and pseudobulbar palsy are the most common and lead to worse quality of life. Impaired cognition can range from mild cognitive impairment to vascular dementia. The classic CADASIL phenotype consists of migraines, subcortical strokes, and ultimately vascular dementia.

Diffuse white matter lesions and subcortical infarcts are present on neuroimaging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features include symmetrical and progressive subcortical white matter hyperintensities (WMHs), lacunes, microbleeds, enlarged perivascular spaces, and cerebral atrophy. Anterior temporal lobe WMHs are often considered a radiological hallmark for CADASIL but are not sensitive or specific for the condition.
View Citations

J Rutten, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1500, CADASIL. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 136., Li Y, et al. (2015) PMID: 25734590, Mancuso M, et al. (2020) PMID: 32196841, Meschia JF, et al. (2023) PMID: 37602377, Guey S, et al. (2021) PMID: 34399586

Natural History (Important subgroups & survival / recovery)

The presenting symptoms, age at onset, and disease progression in CADASIL are variable. Migraine with aura occurs in many individuals with CADASIL. When present, it can be the first symptom, with a mean age of onset of 26-30 years (age range 6-80 years). Over half of those with migraine with aura have experienced an atypical migraine attack: prolonged, basilar or hemiplegic aura, confusion, fever, or coma. In one third of individuals, migraine may be severe and refractory. Transient ischemic attacks and ischemic stroke, the most frequent presentations, are present in a large majority of individuals. They occur at a mean age of 47 years (age range 20-70 years), in most cases without conventional vascular risk factors. Ischemic episodes are often recurrent, leading to severe progression including severe disability with gait disturbance, urinary incontinence, and pseudobulbar palsy. Cognitive decline, the second most frequent feature, may start as early as 35, with over two thirds of individuals developing dementia. Cognitive decline usually manifests initially with executive dysfunction, decreased verbal fluency, and inattention (mild cognitive impairment), slowly progressing to a multidomain cognitive impairment and dementia after 60 years of age. Concurrently, stepwise deterioration occurs due to recurrent strokes. Impaired cognition may be the sole symptom in some individuals. ICH, with occurrence rates being much higher in Asians than in Europeans. Epilepsy occurs in a small percentage of individuals and presents in middle age, usually secondary to stroke.

Brain imaging abnormalities evolve as the disease progresses. MRI WMHs, although sometimes very subtle, can present between 20-40 years of age, often first appearing in the anterior temporal lobes. In the course of the disease, the load of WMH lesions increases, eventually coalescing to the point where, in some elderly individuals, normal-appearing white matter is barely distinguishable.

Prognosis of CADASIL is poor, with severe progression to being unable to speak and get out of bed occurring 10–20 years after stroke onset. However, individuals with milder disease are increasingly reported. Based on a study of 411 individuals, the median age at onset of inability to walk without assistance was approximately 60 years old and the median age at which individuals became bedridden was 64 years. The median age at death was 68 years with a more rapid disease progression in men than in women. The most common cause of death was pneumonia, followed by sudden unexpected death and asphyxia.
View Citations

J Rutten, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1500, CADASIL. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 136., Li Y, et al. (2015) PMID: 25734590, Mancuso M, et al. (2020) PMID: 32196841, Meschia JF, et al. (2023) PMID: 37602377, Guey S, et al. (2021) PMID: 34399586

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Dominant
View Citations

J Rutten, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1500, CADASIL. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 136.

Prevalence of Genetic Variants

>1-2 in 100
More than 95% of individuals with CADASIL have pathogenic variants (PVs) in NOTCH3.
Tier 3 View Citations

J Rutten, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1500, Li Y, et al. (2015) PMID: 25734590

1-2 in 500
The frequency of NOTCH3 cysteine-altering PVs is 1:300 in the general population worldwide (gnomAD database), with the highest frequency in people who are of Asian descent (1:100).
Tier 3 View Citations

J Rutten, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1500

>1-2 in 100
Approximately 70% of European individuals with a clinical CADASIL diagnosis have a PV in one of the exons encoding epidermal growth factor-like repeat (EGFr) domains 1-6. PVs in EGFr domains 7-34 are less frequently seen in diagnosed individuals (~30%) but have a high frequency in the general population (gnomAD).
Tier 3 View Citations

J Rutten, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1500

Penetrance (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

>= 40 %
Penetrance of CADASIL is close to 100%.
Tier 4 View Citations

J Rutten, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1500, Guey S, et al. (2021) PMID: 34399586

>= 40 %
Frequency among symptomatic individuals with CADASIL:

Transient ischemic attacks and strokes = 85%

Dementia = 60-75%

Migraine = 30-75% (80-90% of which have migraine with aura)

Mood disturbances = 30%

Apathy = 40%

Epilepsy = 10%
Tier 3 View Citations

J Rutten, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1500, Li Y, et al. (2015) PMID: 25734590, Meschia JF, et al. (2023) PMID: 37602377

5-39 %
In a study of 125 affected individuals with CADASIL, cerebral microbleeds were present in 34%. The majority of these microbleeds were located in three specific regions of the brain.
Tier 3 View Citations

J Rutten, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1500

5-39 %
A meta-analysis including 13 studies (N=1310 individuals with CADASIL) reported the pooled prevalence of ICH in CADASIL of 10.1% (95% CI: 5.6-18.0%), with 17.7% (95% CI=11.0-28.5%) and 2.0% (95% CI=0.4%–10.8%) within the Asian and European subgroups, respectively.
Tier 1 View Citations

Lai QL, et al. (2022) PMID: 36062766

5-39 %
In a systematic review of ICH in CADASIL, comprising 129 individuals and 142 ICH events in total, ICH was the first manifestation of the disease in 32 individuals (38.1%), recurrence occurred in 16 (12.4%), and 11 individuals died acutely of ICH.
Tier 1 View Citations

Sukhonpanich N, et al. (2024) PMID: 38217707

5-39 %
Recent large prospective studies, ranging from 50-290 individuals with CADASIL, have reported that between 19.0-53.2% of their cohort had hypertension.
Tier 3 View Citations

Meschia JF, et al. (2023) PMID: 37602377

5-39 %
Episodes of fever, confusion, and reduced arousal, called CADASIL coma, may occur in up to 8.5% (6/70) of individuals with CADASIL.
Tier 3 View Citations

Meschia JF, et al. (2023) PMID: 37602377

Relative Risk (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
Information on relative risk was not available.

Expressivity

CADASIL clinical expression varies in age of onset, severity of the clinical symptoms, and progression of the disease. Clinical presentation also varies among and within families.
Tier 4 View Citations

J Rutten, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1500

There is variability in disease severity among individuals with CADASIL. A recent report found that the frequency of NOTCH3 cysteine-altering PVs in the general population is approximately 100-fold higher than current estimates of the minimum prevalence of CADASIL, suggesting that the NOTCH3 clinical spectrum must be considerably broader, ranging from classic CADASIL to a mild small-vessel disease, or possibly non-penetrance.
Tier 3 View Citations

J Rutten, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1500

Onset of stroke in CADASIL is reported to be influenced by classical vascular risk factors such as smoking and hypertension, as well as the presence of cysteine-altering pathogenic variants in NOTCH3 in specific EGFr domains (domains 1-6).
Tier 3 View Citations

J Rutten, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1500, Mancuso M, et al. (2020) PMID: 32196841, Guey S, et al. (2021) PMID: 34399586

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Patient Management

Initial evaluation of all individuals should include:

• Neurologic evaluation

• Psychological evaluation of cognitive disorders

• Brain MRI for overall assessment and follow-up, irrespective of signs or symptoms

• Cervical and transcranial echodoppler for examination for associated atheromatous lesions

• Resting electrocardiogram (ECG)

• Holter blood pressure

• Biochemical evaluation: complete blood count, C-reactive protein, fasting blood glucose, exploration of lipid abnormality (cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, calculated LDL)

Tier 2 View Citations

Mancuso M, et al. (2020) PMID: 32196841, Ruchoux MM, et al. (1997) PMID: 9291937

Individuals should be followed up by specialized centers and/or an expert neurologist.
Tier 2 View Citations

Mancuso M, et al. (2020) PMID: 32196841, Ruchoux MM, et al. (1997) PMID: 9291937

There are no available curative therapies for CADASIL. Therefore, treatment should focus on symptomatic management and management of vascular risk factors, which mainly center around prevention, avoidance, and cessation of specific/potential triggers. Some management approaches lack a clear evidence base, and as a consequence, there are inconsistencies in treatment and preventive care regimens.
Tier 2 View Citations

Mancuso M, et al. (2020) PMID: 32196841, Meschia JF, et al. (2023) PMID: 37602377

Addressing vascular risk for sporadic vascular disease may delay onset, modify severity or prolong the course for individuals with CADASIL.
Tier 2 View Citations

Meschia JF, et al. (2023) PMID: 37602377

Avoid antiplatelet therapy for primary stroke prevention. Extrapolating from general guidelines, physicians have treated many individuals with CADASIL with antiplatelet agents. However, there is no evidence to support the use of antiplatelet agents in individuals with CADASIL without prior ischemic stroke, or for preventing recurrent stroke.
Tier 2 View Citations

Mancuso M, et al. (2020) PMID: 32196841, Meschia JF, et al. (2023) PMID: 37602377

Anticoagulants are not recommended for stroke prophylaxis in CADASIL due to the risk of ICH, but they are not contraindicated if there is another strong indication (e.g. atrial fibrillation, pulmonary embolus).
Tier 2 View Citations

Mancuso M, et al. (2020) PMID: 32196841

Individuals with CADASIL should not receive thrombolysis for an acute small-vessel ischemic stroke, as its safety and efficacy are unknown in individuals with CADASIL. Thrombolysis should only be considered for acute ischemic stroke if it is due to a large-artery occlusion secondary to a concurrent cause, which is very uncommon.
Tier 2 View Citations

Mancuso M, et al. (2020) PMID: 32196841, Meschia JF, et al. (2023) PMID: 37602377

Intensive control of blood pressure is recommended in CADASIL. At a minimum, controlling blood pressure will help prevent cognitive decline and stroke attributed to vascular risk factors, which would only add to those inherent to CADASIL. Several observational studies have reported a high prevalence of hypertension in CADASIL, and that in CADASIL, hypertension has been shown to be associated with incident dementia, disability due to dementia, overall disability, incident stroke, and ICH.
Tier 2 View Citations

Meschia JF, et al. (2023) PMID: 37602377

Because vascular risk factors have been shown to increase the severity of CADASIL, vascular risk factor profile should be carefully evaluated and lifestyle changes such as smoking cessation, healthy diet, and physical exercise should be advised. Given reported associations between tobacco smoking and earlier onset of stroke in individuals with CADASIL, smoking cessation should be strongly encouraged. One study of 200 individuals with CADASIL (101 of which identified as an ever-smoker) reported that stroke was associated with pack-years of smoking (odds ratio [OR] =1.05; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.10; P=0.029).
Tier 2 View Citations

Mancuso M, et al. (2020) PMID: 32196841, Meschia JF, et al. (2023) PMID: 37602377, Ruchoux MM, et al. (1997) PMID: 9291937

Recommendations for migraine prophylaxis are conflicting. One guideline suggests the use of beta-blockers for the prevention of migraine headache with aura, while a more recent guideline recommends avoiding beta-blockers and states that acetazolamide and sodium valproate may be preferred for prophylaxis.
Tier 2 View Citations

Meschia JF, et al. (2023) PMID: 37602377, Ruchoux MM, et al. (1997) PMID: 9291937

A meta-analysis of prophylactic medications for migraine in CADASIL included 123 individuals (from 13 studies) with a median age of 53 years (range: 23-83 years). Simple analgesics (35.8%, 44/123) and beta-blockers (22.0%, 27/123) were the most common abortive and prophylactic strategies, respectively. Over half (54.4%) of all individuals had used more than one medication sequentially or concomitantly. The most common prophylactic medications used were equivocal in terms of response.
Tier 1 View Citations

Glover PA, et al. (2020) PMID: 33520412

Individuals should be offered psychological support and psychotherapy if needed.
Tier 2 View Citations

Mancuso M, et al. (2020) PMID: 32196841, Ruchoux MM, et al. (1997) PMID: 9291937

Consider referral to a psychiatrist for evaluation and treatment of mood/behavioral disorders.
Tier 4 View Citations

J Rutten, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1500

Consider treatment with the cholinesterase inhibitor, donepezil 10 mg/day, to improve impaired executive function.
Tier 2 View Citations

Meschia JF, et al. (2023) PMID: 37602377

A systematic review of cholinesterase inhibitors included one RCT of donepezil in individuals with CADASIL and documented cognitive impairment (n=161). After 18 weeks of treatment, no significant differences were found between the treatment and placebo groups on primary cognitive or dementia scales. Improvements were noted on secondary outcome measures of executive function and processing speed, but the clinical relevance of these findings was not clear.
Tier 1 View Citations

Li Y, et al. (2015) PMID: 25734590

Cerebral catheter angiography should be avoided in individuals with CADASIL, unless being used therapeutically for a known symptomatic acute large vessel occlusion. In a review of individuals with CADASIL undergoing diagnostic cerebral catheter angiography, 69% (11/16) experienced neurological symptoms lasting hours to weeks after the procedure.
Tier 2 View Citations

Meschia JF, et al. (2023) PMID: 37602377

Anesthetic procedures maintaining hemodynamic stability and avoiding hypotension are recommended for individuals with CADASIL undergoing surgery.
Tier 2 View Citations

Mancuso M, et al. (2020) PMID: 32196841

Surgical management should include maintaining tight control of intraoperative mean arterial pressure, and head-down positioning should be restricted or avoided.
Tier 2 View Citations

Meschia JF, et al. (2023) PMID: 37602377

In the context of anesthesia, both hypo- and hypercapnia should be avoided because of the limits of autoregulation of the diseased vessels are not known.
Tier 2 View Citations

Ruchoux MM, et al. (1997) PMID: 9291937

Surveillance

Individuals should have a yearly evaluation of their vascular risk factor profile.
Tier 2 View Citations

Mancuso M, et al. (2020) PMID: 32196841

Individuals should be monitored for subjective and objective cognitive impairment.
Tier 2 View Citations

Mancuso M, et al. (2020) PMID: 32196841

The interval at which individuals with CADASIL should be seen for follow up depends on the severity and type of symptoms and the needs of individuals and their caregivers. Routine follow up by a neurologist with expertise in CADASIL is recommended from the time of diagnosis onward.
Tier 4 View Citations

J Rutten, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1500

Circumstances to Avoid

Most management recommendations focus on strategies such as avoidance, and cessation of specific/potential triggers. These are listed in the management section above.
Tier 2 View Citations

Mancuso M, et al. (2020) PMID: 32196841, Meschia JF, et al. (2023) PMID: 37602377

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Nature of Intervention

Most interventions associated with CADASIL are avoidance of procedures, situations, and substances that could lead to cerebrovascular episodes, which are associated with minimal risk and burden. Cholinesterase inhibitors are associated with gastrointestinal side effects, including nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, leg cramps, abnormal dreams, dizziness, and weight loss.
Context: Adult
View Citations

Li Y, et al. (2015) PMID: 25734590

A meta-analysis that reviewed prophylactic medications for migraine in CADASIL, including 123 individuals (from 13 studies) found that individuals who received beta-blockers had significantly more unfavorable outcomes compared with individuals who did not, with the primary unfavorable response reported being worsened fatigue.
Context: Adult
View Citations

Glover PA, et al. (2020) PMID: 33520412

Chance to Escape Clinical Detection

The first manifestations of CADASIL may be migraine, which may not lead to the diagnosis of CADASIL before the onset of cognitive decline.
Context: Adult
Tier 4 View Citations

J Rutten, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1500, CADASIL. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 136.

The phenotype observed in individuals with CADASIL can be indistinguishable from many other inherited disorders characterized by stroke and/or dementia.
Context: Adult
Tier 4 View Citations

J Rutten, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1500

The clinical characteristics and MRI abnormalities in multiple sclerosis, sporadic small vessel disease including Binswanger's disease, and primary angiitis of the nervous system, may resemble those of CADASIL. For example, corpus callosal involvement, typical of multiple sclerosis but rare in sporadic small vessel disease, can occur in CADASIL.
Context: Adult
Tier 3 View Citations

J Rutten, et al. (2000) NCBI: NBK1500, Mancuso M, et al. (2020) PMID: 32196841

While the presence and location of MRI WMHs have high discriminatory accuracy for CADASIL, other inherited microangiopathies and even sporadic cerebral small vessel disease can have similar patterns.
Context: Adult
Tier 3 View Citations

Meschia JF, et al. (2023) PMID: 37602377

Hereditary cerebral amyloid angiopathies can mimic CADASIL, presenting with a CADASIL-like clinical and neuroimaging phenotype (progressive cognitive and motor decline, stroke, migraine and behavioral disorders, and leukoencephalopathy).
Context: Adult
Tier 3 View Citations

Meschia JF, et al. (2023) PMID: 37602377

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Gene Condition Associations
OMIM Identifier Primary MONDO Identifier Additional MONDO Identifiers
NOTCH3 125310 0000914

References List

Glover PA, Goldstein ED, Badi MK, Brigham TJ, Lesser ER, Brott TG, Meschia JF. (2020) Treatment of migraine in patients with CADASIL: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. Clinical practice. 10(2163-0402):488-496.

Guey S, Lesnik Oberstein SAJ, Tournier-Lasserve E, Chabriat H. (2021) Hereditary Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases and Stroke: A Guide for Diagnosis and Management. Stroke. 52(1524-4628):3025-3032.

J Rutten, SAJ Lesnik Oberstein. CADASIL. (2000) [Updated Jul 14 2016]. In: RA Pagon, MP Adam, HH Ardinger, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1500/

Lai QL, Zhang YX, Wang JJ, Mo YJ, Zhuang LY, Cheng L, Weng ST, Qiao S, Liu L. (2022) Occurrence of Intracranial Hemorrhage and Associated Risk Factors in Cerebral Autosomal Dominant Arteriopathy With Subcortical Infarcts and Leukoencephalopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea). 18(1738-6586):499-506.

Li Y, Hai S, Zhou Y, Dong BR. (2015) Cholinesterase inhibitors for rarer dementias associated with neurological conditions. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2015(3):CD009444.

Mancuso M, Arnold M, Bersano A, Burlina A, Chabriat H, Debette S, Enzinger C, Federico A, Filla A, Finsterer J, Hunt D, Lesnik Oberstein S, Tournier-Lasserve E, Markus HS. (2020) Monogenic cerebral small-vessel diseases: diagnosis and therapy. Consensus recommendations of the European Academy of Neurology. European journal of neurology. 27(1468-1331):909-927.

Meschia JF, Worrall BB, Elahi FM, Ross OA, Wang MM, Goldstein ED, Rost NS, Majersik JJ, Gutierrez J, American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Clinical Cardiology; and Council on Hypertension. (2023) Management of Inherited CNS Small Vessel Diseases: The CADASIL Example: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Stroke. 54(1524-4628):e452-e464.

Ruchoux MM, Maurage CA. (1997) CADASIL: Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy. Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology. 56(0022-3069):947-64.

Sukhonpanich N, Markus HS. (2024) Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and risk factors of intracerebral haemorrhage in CADASIL: a case series and systematic review. Journal of neurology. 271(1432-1459):2423-2433.

Early Rule-Out Summary

This topic did not pass the early rule out stage when reviewed on 12/05/2024 due to insufficient evidence for actionability. However, the Actionability Working Group discussed and granted an exception to move this topic forward for a full evidence curation and summary report.

Findings of Early Rule-Out Assessment

  1. Is there a qualifying resource, such as a practice guideline or systematic review, for the genetic condition?
  2. Does the practice guideline or systematic review indicate that the result is actionable in one or more of the following ways?
  3. a. Patient Management

    b. Surveillance or Screening

    c. Circumstances to Avoid

  4. Is it actionable in an undiagnosed adult with the condition?
  5. Is this condition an important health problem?
  6. Is there at least on known pathogenic variant with at least moderate penetrance (≥40%) or moderate relative risk (≥2) in any population?