Actionability Assertions

Gene Condition (MONDO ID) OMIM ID Final Assertion
COL5A1 Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type (0007522) 130000 Moderate Actionability
COL5A2 Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type (0007522) 130010 Moderate Actionability

Actionability Assertion Rationale

  • All experts agreed with the assertion computed according to the rubric. Given the limited effectiveness data in individuals with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, effectiveness data were extrapolated from Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, hypermobility type.

Actionability Scores

Outcome / Intervention Pair Severity Likelihood Effectiveness Nature of Intervention Total Score
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type-related morbidity / Referral to specialists for symptom management and anticipatory guidance 2 3N 1D 3 9ND
View scoring key
Domain of Actionability Scoring Metric State of the Knowledgebase
Severity: What is the nature of the threat to health to an individual? 3 = Sudden death as a reasonably possible outcome
2 = Reasonable possibility of death or major morbidity
1 = Modest morbidity
0 = Minimal or no morbidity
N/A
Likelihood: What is the chance that the outcome will occur? 3 = >40% chance
2 = 5%-39% chance
1 = 1%-4% chance
0 = <1% chance
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Effectiveness: What is the effectiveness of a specific intervention in preventing or diminishing the risk of harm? 3 = Highly effective
2 = Moderately effective
1 = Minimally effective
0 = Controversial or unknown effectiveness
IN = Ineffective/No interventiona
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Nature of intervention: How risky, medically burdensome, or intensive is the intervention? 3 = Low risk, or medically acceptable and low intensity
2 = Moderate risk, moderately acceptable or intensive
1 = Greater risk, less acceptable and substantial intensity
0 = High risk, poorly acceptable or intensive
N/A
a Do not score the remaining categories

Prevalence of the Genetic Condition

The prevalence of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type is estimated at 1 in 20,000. However, it is likely that some individuals with milder manifestations of the disease, may go undetected.
View Citations

F Malfait, et al. (2007) NCBI: NBK1244, Classical Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 287.

Clinical Features (Signs / symptoms)

Classic EDS (cEDS) is a connective tissue disorder characterized by skin hyperextensibility, abnormal wound healing, and generalized joint hypermobility. Skin may be soft, velvety, doughy, and fragile. Areas over pressure points (knees, elbows) and areas prone to trauma (shins, forehead, chin) are easily split following relatively minor trauma. Wound healing is poor, and stretching, thinning, and pigmentation of scars is characteristic, leading to atrophic and/or hemosiderotic scars. Other dermatologic features may include molluscoid pseudotumors, subcutaneous spheroids, piezogenic papules, elastosis perforans serpinginosa, acrocyanosis and chilblains. Manifestations of generalized tissue extensibility and fragility are observed in multiple organs including cervical insufficiency during pregnancy, inguinal/umbilical hernia, hiatal/incisional hernia, or recurrent rectal prolapse in early childhood. Other problems related to joint hypermobility and instability may include sprain, dislocations/subluxations (usually resolve spontaneously or are easily managed), chronic joint and limb pain, foot deformities, temporomandibular joint dysfunction, joint effusions, and osteoarthritis. Other features may include mild muscle hypotonia with delayed motor development, problems with ambulation, fatigue and muscle cramps, skeletal morphologic alterations (scoliosis, pectus deformities, genus/hallux valgus, pes planus, clubfoot), epicanthal folds, prolonged bleeding, and easy bruising. Structural cardiac malformations are uncommon in cEDS. Mitral valve prolapse, and less frequently tricuspid valve prolapse, and aortic root dilatation may occur. Arterial aneurysm and rupture, along with intracranial aneurysms and arteriovenous fistulae may occur in the rare individual with severe cEDS. Classic EDS bears risk for newborns and mothers including premature rupture of membranes/prematurity, cervical insufficiency, perineal tearing during labor, postpartum hemorrhage, pelvic prolapse, and incontinence following delivery may occur.
View Citations

F Malfait, et al. (2007) NCBI: NBK1244, Classical Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 287., Malfait F, et al. (2017) PMID: 28306229, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2024) OMIM: 130000, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2018) OMIM: 130010

Natural History (Important subgroups & survival / recovery)

Clinical presentation may occur anywhere between birth to childhood. In childhood, bruising, skin fragility, and abnormal scarring are common signs. Muscle hypotonia, delayed gross motor development, and hip dislocations can be early presentations of the disorder. Rectal prolapse may be the presenting symptom for young children. Joint hypermobility depends on age, gender, family, and ethnic background. It is usually noted when a child starts to walk. When aortic dilation does occur, it appears to be more common in young individuals and rarely progresses. Mitral valve prolapse is rarely severe. Medical or surgical intervention is rarely necessary for either. Slow wound healing leads to increased frequency of infection. Life expectancy can be shortened due to the possibility of vessel rupture but is otherwise not affected.
View Citations

F Malfait, et al. (2007) NCBI: NBK1244, Classical Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 287., Tinkle, B. T.,Atzinger, C. L.. (2010) URL: onlinelibrary.wiley.com.

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Dominant
View Citations

Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2024) OMIM: 130000, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2018) OMIM: 130010

Prevalence of Genetic Variants

1-2 in 50000
Approximately 81% of individuals with cEDS have a pathogenic variant in the COL5A1 and 16% have a pathogenic variant in COL5A2.
Tier 3 View Citations

F Malfait, et al. (2007) NCBI: NBK1244

1-2 in 50000
Approximately 50% of individuals with cEDS have a de novo pathogenic variant.
Tier 4 View Citations

F Malfait, et al. (2007) NCBI: NBK1244

Penetrance (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

>= 40 %
Penetrance is presumably 100% in both males and females.
Tier 4 View Citations

F Malfait, et al. (2007) NCBI: NBK1244, Mayer K, et al. (2013) PMID: 22892533

>= 40 %
Two reviews of manifestations in individuals with cEDS included 171 individuals with a mean age at presentation of 30.5 years (± 20.7 years). Reported frequencies of the most common features were:

Cutaneous features

• Skin hyperextensibity 94.5%

• Easy bruising 59.7%

• Skin fragility 67.4%

• Soft, doughy skin 81%

• Piezogenic papules 80.6%

• Abnormal scarring 96%Extracutaneous features

• Joint hypermobility 77%

• Pes planus 87.3%

• Scoliosis 76.3%

• Blue/gray sclera 56.5%

• Sprain 57.4%

• Subluxation/dislocation 62.8%

• Hypotonia/weakness 12.5%

• Joint pain 46%

• Cardiovascular (early onset varicose veins, valvular issues, arterial tortuosity, fistulae, murmurs and bundle-branch blocks) 63.4%

• Chronic pain 43.1%

• Gastrointestinal (constipation, diarrhea, irritable bowel syndrome, reflux and/or hepatitis) 66.7%

• Ocular (myopia, astigmatism, keratoconus, cornea perforation, lens dislocation, glaucoma, and/or scleral ectasia) 65.7%

Tier 5 View Citations

Doolan BJ, et al. (2023) PMID: 36764582, Doolan BJ, et al. (2023) PMID: 36756177

5-39 %
A retrospective review of patients with EDS undergoing screening echocardiography showed that at a median age of 16 years, 3/50 (6%) patients with classic EDS had aortic dilation at their first echocardiogram. No individual had a rupture of their aorta or any other blood vessel or aortic root replacement. One individual had a moderate-to-severe valvular anomaly.
Tier 3 View Citations

F Malfait, et al. (2007) NCBI: NBK1244

5-39 %
In a systematic review of vascular complications in 110 individuals with cEDS, 11% of individuals reported vascular complications including hematoma (3%), intracranial hemorrhage (1%), arterial dissection (7%), arterial aneurysm (3%) and GI bleeding (1%). Three adults died from rupture of a large or medium-sized artery (mean age: 35 years, range 28-43 years) and one 9-year-old died from multiorgan failure secondary to the rupture of an aneurysm of the superior mesenteric artery.
Tier 1 View Citations

D'hondt S, et al. (2018) PMID: 28981071

Relative Risk (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
No information on relative risk was identified.

Expressivity

Pathogenic variants in COL5A2 are thought to result in a phenotype at the more severe end of the cEDS spectrum.
Tier 3 View Citations

F Malfait, et al. (2007) NCBI: NBK1244

The severity, specific manifestations, and progression of cEDS are variable. Intrafamilial phenotypic variability is observed.
Tier 4 View Citations

F Malfait, et al. (2007) NCBI: NBK1244, Classical Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 287.

Abnormal scarring can range in severity, ranging from mild to extensive scarring at multiple sites.
Tier 4 View Citations

Malfait F, et al. (2017) PMID: 28306229

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Patient Management

To establish the extent of disease in an individual diagnosed with cEDS the following evaluations are recommended:

• Clinical examination of the skin with assessment of skin hyperextensibility, atrophic scars and bruises, and other manifestations of cEDS

• Evaluation of joint mobility with use of Beighton score

• Evaluation for hypotonia and motor development in infants and children

• Evaluation for easy bruising and/or prolonged bleeding

• Evaluation of clotting factors if severe easy bruising is present

• Baseline echocardiogram with aortic diameter measurement

• Genetic counseling by genetics professionals

Tier 4 View Citations

F Malfait, et al. (2007) NCBI: NBK1244, Classical Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 287., Angwin C, et al. (2024) PMID: 38767179

Supportive care to improve quality of life, maximize function, and reduce complications is recommended. Treatment and management are symptomatic and preventative. This ideally involves multidisciplinary care by specialists in relevant fields.
Tier 4 View Citations

F Malfait, et al. (2007) NCBI: NBK1244, Classical Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 287.

The first principle of skin management is prevention of injury. This should focus on protective clothing; appropriate pads over bony prominences (elbows, knees, shins and knuckles) and patient education. Nonadherent dressings should be used on lacerations whenever possible to avoid further trauma to the skin. Wounds should be reapproximated and fixed in place with adhesive tape or sutures. Compression dressings should be applied, and if adhesive is required, the dressing should be thoroughly soaked before removal. For small lacerations not under tension, cyanoacrylate adhesives are more appropriate. Where sutures are required, care should be taken to maximize perfusion of skin edges, and any compressive or high-tension sutures should be avoided. Skin wounds should be closed without tension, in two layers with generous deep sutures. Sutures should be left in place for twice as long as normal. Surgeons or physicians with EDS experience should be sought when the wound is under significant tension, particularly large, in an area of low vascular supply, or in an area of high cosmetic or functional importance. However, there is a paucity of evidence regarding clinical management of skin fragility and wounds in EDS, with most studies reporting single cases, small case series or limited cohort studies.
Tier 2 View Citations

Angwin C, et al. (2024) PMID: 38767179

The mainstay of treatment is joint protection by activity modification and joint-stabilization exercises, as surgical options are often unsuccessful. Braces are useful to improve joint stability. Referral for knee, ankle, ring, wrist, or thumb braces as needed. A soft neck collar may help with neck pain and headaches. A wheelchair or scooter can be used to decrease stress on lower-extremity joints. A waterbed, adjustable air mattress, or viscoelastic foam mattress may increase support for improved sleep quality and less pain.
Tier 4 View Citations

F Malfait, et al. (2007) NCBI: NBK1244

A physiotherapeutic program is recommended for children with hypotonia and/or delayed motor development. Supportive therapy of joints and musculature by isotonic training at home after physiotherapeutic instructions. Physical or occupational therapists can instruct on proper joint use within normal range of motion as well as gentle muscle strengthening. Non-weight-bearing exercise, such as swimming is useful to promote muscular development, strength, and coordination.
Tier 4 View Citations

F Malfait, et al. (2007) NCBI: NBK1244, Classical Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 287., Tinkle, B. T.,Atzinger, C. L.. (2010) URL: onlinelibrary.wiley.com., Mayer K, et al. (2013) PMID: 22892533

A study evaluating the use of resistance training on muscle function in three individuals with genetically verified cEDS, reported that strength training 3 times a week for 4 months improved tendon and muscle properties. Mean isometric leg extension force and leg extensor power both increased by 8 and 11%, respectively. Tendon stiffness increased in response to physical training and training loads both in upper and lower body exercises increased by around 30%. When testing balance, the average sway-area of the participants decreased by 26%. Subjective fatigue also decreased.
Tier 5 View Citations

Møller MB, et al. (2014) PMID: 25489549

A prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial compared an 8-week exercise program performed into either the full hypermobile range or only to neutral knee extension. Children with joint hypermobility syndrome and knee pain (n=26) aged 7-16 years were randomly assigned to the hypermobile (n=12) or neutral (n=14) treatment group. Statistically significant pre-post improvements were made in thigh strength, child report of knee pain, and parent-reported physical and psychosocial summary scores in both treatment groups.
Tier 5 View Citations

Pacey V, et al. (2013) PMID: 23941143

Oral vitamin C supplementation is often recommended to patients with EDS to reduce the severity of bruising and promote healing.
Tier 2 View Citations

Angwin C, et al. (2024) PMID: 38767179

DDAVP (desmopressin) may be useful to normalize bleeding time. DDAVP may be beneficial with bruising or epistaxis, or before procedures such as dental extractions.
Tier 4 View Citations

F Malfait, et al. (2007) NCBI: NBK1244

A retrospective chart review of children with clinically diagnosed EDS (unspecified type) referred for bleeding symptoms included 19 children who had a desmopressin challenge. Mean bleeding time decreased from 11.26 (+/-4.39) minutes to 5.95 (+/-2.41) minutes with treatment (P < 0.01). Only four individuals failed to have a fully correctable bleeding time; however, two of these had substantial improvement.
Tier 5 View Citations

Mast KJ, et al. (2009) PMID: 19036109

Women with cEDS should receive multidisciplinary input from obstetricians, geneticists, cardiology and rheumatology/orthopedics for pregnancy planning. Because of the increased risk of skin lacerations, postpartum hemorrhages, and prolapse of the uterus and/or bladder, monitoring of women throughout pregnancy and in the postpartum period is recommended. Physiotherapist referral should be made to address pelvic instability and pain. Echocardiography should be completed to monitor for known aortic root dilation. Monitoring for IUGR and preterm labor is warranted. Cervical insufficiency should be anticipated and sought at each prenatal visit, with consideration of imaging at 16-20 weeks gestation to determine cervical length. For vaginal delivery, prompt episiotomy should be considered to prevent excessive perineal damage and should be repaired by an experienced individual. Prophylactic desmopressin and tranexamic acid, along with postpartum oxytocin, should be considered in view of the increased risk for postpartum hemorrhage.
Tier 4 View Citations

F Malfait, et al. (2007) NCBI: NBK1244, Classical Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 287., Tinkle, B. T.,Atzinger, C. L.. (2010) URL: onlinelibrary.wiley.com., Kang J, et al. (2020) PMID: 33113401

Considerations during surgery and use of anesthesia for EDS subtypes include: care during placement of spinal anesthesia to avoid post-dural puncture headache; monitoring of neuromusucular blockade; careful interoperative positioning with optimal padding, reduction of shear forces, and protection of eyes; adhesive tapes should be easily removable and avoided when possible; careful preparation of airway/ventilation; careful transport and mobilization; and avoidance of tourniquets, central venous catheters, and arterial lines.
Tier 4 View Citations

Wiesmann, T. (2013) URL: doi.org.

Bone mineral density scans (DEXA) should be considered in all adults with EDS.
Tier 4 View Citations

Tinkle, B. T.,Atzinger, C. L.. (2010) URL: onlinelibrary.wiley.com.

Surveillance

The following surveillance is recommended:

• Assessment for skin fragility at each visit

• Assessment for joint instability, occupational and physical therapy needs, mobility issues and pain at each visit

• Evaluation for hypotonia and motor development in infants and children at each visit

• Assessment for easy bruising and/or prolonged bleeding at each visit

• Evaluation of clotting factors if severe easy bruising is present

• In children with normal initial echocardiogram, frequency of follow up per pediatric cardiologist

• In adults with normal initial echocardiogram, no follow-up echocardiogram necessary

Tier 4 View Citations

F Malfait, et al. (2007) NCBI: NBK1244

At routine physician visits, patients should be evaluated for gastrointestinal symptoms, sleep difficulties, pain and headache.
Tier 4 View Citations

Tinkle, B. T.,Atzinger, C. L.. (2010) URL: onlinelibrary.wiley.com.

Circumstances to Avoid

To prevent skin injury, individuals should avoid contact, collision and combative sports.
Tier 2 View Citations

Angwin C, et al. (2024) PMID: 38767179

Individuals should avoid sports with heavy joint strain such as contact sports, fighting sports, football and running. Activities that cause joints to overextend (e.g., pitching, racquet sports, gymnastics) should also be avoided. Undue trauma and excessive stretching should be avoided.
Tier 4 View Citations

F Malfait, et al. (2007) NCBI: NBK1244, Classical Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 287., Tinkle, B. T.,Atzinger, C. L.. (2010) URL: onlinelibrary.wiley.com.

Excessive sun exposure should be avoided to prevent damage to the skin.
Tier 4 View Citations

Tinkle, B. T.,Atzinger, C. L.. (2010) URL: onlinelibrary.wiley.com.

Scar revision (vanishing) products should also be avoided as the breakdown of the scar tissue can result in atrophic scarring.
Tier 4 View Citations

Tinkle, B. T.,Atzinger, C. L.. (2010) URL: onlinelibrary.wiley.com.

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Nature of Intervention

Interventions include exercise, echocardiogram, increased perinatal surveillance, and avoidance of factors that may cause damage to skin or joints.
Context: Adult Pediatric

Chance to Escape Clinical Detection

Some individuals may have a mild clinical phenotype that may escape clinical detection. Many of those affected wait for years and have seen multiple health care providers before some of the symptoms are ultimately recognized as features of an overall disorder.
Context: Adult Pediatric
View Citations

F Malfait, et al. (2007) NCBI: NBK1244, Tinkle, B. T.,Atzinger, C. L.. (2010) URL: onlinelibrary.wiley.com.

Classic EDS shows some clinical overlap with other EDS types as well as other inherited connective tissue disorders.
Context: Adult Pediatric
View Citations

Tinkle, B. T.,Atzinger, C. L.. (2010) URL: onlinelibrary.wiley.com.

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Gene Condition Associations
OMIM Identifier Primary MONDO Identifier Additional MONDO Identifiers
COL5A1 130000 0007522 0019567
COL5A2 130010 0007522 0019568

References List

Angwin C, Doolan BJ, Hausser I, Labine B, Lavallee M, Mackay D, Pope FM, Seneviratne SL, Winship I, Burrows NP. (2024) Skin fragility and wound management in Ehlers-Danlos syndromes: a report by the International Consortium on Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes and Hypermobility Spectrum Disorders Skin Working Group. Clinical and experimental dermatology. 49(1365-2230):1496-1503.

Classical Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Orphanet encyclopedia, http://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=en&Expert=287

D'hondt S, Van Damme T, Malfait F. (2018) Vascular phenotypes in nonvascular subtypes of the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a systematic review. Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics. 20(1530-0366):562-573.

Doolan BJ, Lavallee M, Hausser I, Pope FM, Seneviratne SL, Winship IM, Burrows NP. (2023) Dermatologic manifestations and diagnostic assessments of the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes: A clinical review. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 89(1097-6787):551-559.

Doolan BJ, Lavallee ME, Hausser I, Schubart JR, Michael Pope F, Seneviratne SL, Winship IM, Burrows NP. (2023) Extracutaneous features and complications of the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes: A systematic review. Frontiers in medicine. 10(2296-858X):1053466.

EHLERS-DANLOS SYNDROME, CLASSIC TYPE, 1; EDSCL1. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 130000, (2024) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

EHLERS-DANLOS SYNDROME, CLASSIC TYPE, 2; EDSCL2. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 130010, (2018) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

F Malfait, R Wenstrup, A De Paepe. Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Classic Type. (2007) [Updated Aug 18 2011]. In: RA Pagon, MP Adam, HH Ardinger, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1244/

Kang J, Hanif M, Mirza E, Jaleel S. (2020) Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome in Pregnancy: A Review. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 255(1872-7654):118-123.

Malfait F, Francomano C, Byers P, Belmont J, Berglund B, Black J, Bloom L, Bowen JM, Brady AF, Burrows NP, Castori M, Cohen H, Colombi M, Demirdas S, De Backer J, De Paepe A, Fournel-Gigleux S, Frank M, Ghali N, Giunta C, Grahame R, Hakim A, Jeunemaitre X, Johnson D, Juul-Kristensen B, Kapferer-Seebacher I, Kazkaz H, Kosho T, Lavallee ME, Levy H, Mendoza-Londono R, Pepin M, Pope FM, Reinstein E, Robert L, Rohrbach M, Sanders L, Sobey GJ, Van Damme T, Vandersteen A, van Mourik C, Voermans N, Wheeldon N, Zschocke J, Tinkle B. (2017) The 2017 international classification of the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes. American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics. 175(1552-4876):8-26.

Mast KJ, Nunes ME, Ruymann FB, Kerlin BA. (2009) Desmopressin responsiveness in children with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome associated bleeding symptoms. British journal of haematology. 144(1365-2141):230-3.

Mayer K, Kennerknecht I, Steinmann B. (2013) Clinical utility gene card for: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome types I-VII and variants - update 2012. European journal of human genetics : EJHG. 21(1).

Møller MB, Kjær M, Svensson RB, Andersen JL, Magnusson SP, Nielsen RH. (2014) Functional adaptation of tendon and skeletal muscle to resistance training in three patients with genetically verified classic Ehlers Danlos Syndrome. Muscles, ligaments and tendons journal. 4(2240-4554):315-23.

Pacey V, Tofts L, Adams RD, Munns CF, Nicholson LL. (2013) Exercise in children with joint hypermobility syndrome and knee pain: a randomised controlled trial comparing exercise into hypermobile versus neutral knee extension. Pediatric rheumatology online journal. 11(1546-0096):30.

Tinkle, B. T.,Atzinger, C. L.. Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. Management of Genetic Syndromes (2010) URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470893159.ch24

Wiesmann, T. Anesthesia recommendations for patients suffering from Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. Orphananesthesia (2013) URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-014-0109-5

Early Rule-Out Summary

This topic passed the early rule out stage

Findings of Early Rule-Out Assessment

  1. Is there a qualifying resource, such as a practice guideline or systematic review, for the genetic condition?
  2. Does the practice guideline or systematic review indicate that the result is actionable in one or more of the following ways?
  3. a. Patient Management

    b. Surveillance or Screening

    c. Circumstances to Avoid

  4. Is it actionable in an undiagnosed adult with the condition?
  5. Is this condition an important health problem?
  6. Is there at least on known pathogenic variant with at least moderate penetrance (≥40%) or moderate relative risk (≥2) in any population?