Actionability Assertions

Gene Condition (MONDO ID) OMIM ID Final Assertion
No assertions found.

Actionability Assertion Rationale

  • This topic was initially scored prior to development of the process for making actionability assertions. The Actionability Working Group decided to defer making an assertion until after the topic could be reviewed through the update process.

Actionability Scores

Outcome / Intervention Pair Severity Likelihood Effectiveness Nature of Intervention Total Score
Morbidity from parathyroid adenoma / Biochemical surveillance 1 3C 3B 3 10CB
Morbidity from other neuroendocrine tumors / Biochemical surveillance 2 3C 2B 3 10CB
Morbidity from other neuroendocrine tumors / Imaging surveillance 2 3C 2B 2 9CB
View scoring key
Domain of Actionability Scoring Metric State of the Knowledgebase
Severity: What is the nature of the threat to health to an individual? 3 = Sudden death as a reasonably possible outcome
2 = Reasonable possibility of death or major morbidity
1 = Modest morbidity
0 = Minimal or no morbidity
N/A
Likelihood: What is the chance that the outcome will occur? 3 = >40% chance
2 = 5%-39% chance
1 = 1%-4% chance
0 = <1% chance
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Effectiveness: What is the effectiveness of a specific intervention in preventing or diminishing the risk of harm? 3 = Highly effective
2 = Moderately effective
1 = Minimally effective
0 = Controversial or unknown effectiveness
IN = Ineffective/No interventiona
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Nature of intervention: How risky, medically burdensome, or intensive is the intervention? 3 = Low risk, or medically acceptable and low intensity
2 = Moderate risk, moderately acceptable or intensive
1 = Greater risk, less acceptable and substantial intensity
0 = High risk, poorly acceptable or intensive
N/A
a Do not score the remaining categories

Prevalence of the Genetic Condition

Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) has an estimated prevalence of 1/10,000 to 1/30,000.
View Citations

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 652., F Giusti, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1538

Clinical Features (Signs / symptoms)

MEN1 syndrome includes varying combinations of more than 20 endocrine and non-endocrine tumors. Associated endocrine tumors including parathyroid tumors, anterior pituitary tumors, well-differentiated endocrine tumors of the gastro-entero-pancreatic tract, carcinoid tumors, and adrenocortical tumors. Parathyroid tumors, resulting in primary hyperparathyroidism, are the most common feature of MEN1. Clinical features are related to the sites of the tumors and their products of secretion. Non-endocrine tumors include facial angiofibromas, collegenomas, lipomas, meningiomas, edendymomas, and leiomyomas.
View Citations

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 652., F Giusti, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1538, Thakker RV, et al. (2012) PMID: 22723327

Natural History (Important subgroups & survival / recovery)

Parathyroid tumors, resulting in primary hyperparathyroidism, are the most common feature and the first clinical manifestation in 90% of individuals with MEN1 with onset typically between ages 20 and 25 years. However MEN1 affects all age groups, with a reported age range of 5 to 81 years. Untreated patients with MEN1 have a decreased life expectancy with a 50% probability of death by age 50. The cause of death in 50-70% of cases due to a malignant tumor process or sequelae of the disease. MEN1-associated tumors are more difficult to treat surgically, are more associated with occult metastatic disease, and may be larger, more aggressive, and more resistant to treatment than non-MEN1 associated tumors. MEN1 affects both sexes equally.
View Citations

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 652., Thakker RV, et al. (2012) PMID: 22723327

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Dominant

Prevalence of Genetic Variants

1-2 in 50000
The prevalence of MEN1 is estimated at 1/30,000.

Given that MEN1 mutations are detected in 80-90% of probands with familial MEN1 it is expected that the mutation frequency would also approach 1/30,000.
Tier 3 View Citations

F Giusti, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1538

Penetrance (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

>= 40 %
The age-related penetrance for all clinical features of MEN1 surpasses 50% by age 20 and 95% by age 40.
Tier 3 View Citations

F Giusti, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1538

Unknown
For specific tumor types, penetrance estimates are: parathyroid adenoma (90%), enteropancreatic tumor (30-70%), pituitary adenoma (30-40%), adrenal cortical tumor (40%), pheochromocytoma (< 1%) , bronchopulmonary NET (2%), thymic NET (2%), gastric NET (10%), lipomas (30%), angiofibromas (85%), collagenomas (70%), and meningiomas (8%).
Tier 3 View Citations

F Giusti, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1538

Relative Risk (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
Information on relative risk of MEN1 tumors was not available.

Expressivity

Combinations of affected glands and their respective pathological features may differ in members of the same family and even between identical twins.
Tier 3 View Citations

F Giusti, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1538, Thakker RV, et al. (2012) PMID: 22723327

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Patient Management

Prophylactic thymectomy should be considered at the time of neck surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism in males with MEN1 syndrome, particularly those who are smokers or have relatives with thymic carcinoid.
Tier 3 View Citations

F Giusti, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1538

Surveillance

Patients with MEN1 should undergo a program of combined clinical, biochemical, and radiological screening for MEN1-associated tumors. Patients are recommended to undergo screening for parathyroid tumors with an annual assessment of plasma calcium and parathyroid hormone to screen for primary hyperparathyroidism beginning at age 8. Patients are also suggested to undergo additional screening for pancreatic NET, pituitary tumors, thymic NET, bronchopulmonary NET, gastric NET, and adrenal tumors. The nature and timing of the screening will depend on local resources, clinical judgment, and patient preferences. The prognosis for MEN1 patients might be improved by presymptomatic tumor detection as earlier diagnosis and treatment of these tumors may help reduce morbidity and mortality.
Tier 2 View Citations

Thakker RV, et al. (2012) PMID: 22723327

Circumstances to Avoid

Information on circumstances to avoid was not available.

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Nature of Intervention

The identified interventions involve a complex program clinical, biochemical, and radiological screenings which may be burdensome and involve risks.
Context: Adult

Chance to Escape Clinical Detection

Given the early age of tumor development and recommended screenings that are not a part of typical recommended clinical care, patients with MEN1 would likely escape detection prior to symptoms indicative of endocrine tumors.
Context: Adult
View Citations

F Giusti, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1538, Thakker RV, et al. (2012) PMID: 22723327

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Gene Condition Associations
OMIM Identifier Primary MONDO Identifier Additional MONDO Identifiers

References List

F Giusti, F Marini, ML Brandi. Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1. (2005) [Updated Feb 12 2015]. In: RA Pagon, MP Adam, HH Ardinger, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1538/

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Orphanet encyclopedia, http://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=en&Expert=652

Thakker RV, Newey PJ, Walls GV, Bilezikian J, Dralle H, Ebeling PR, Melmed S, Sakurai A, Tonelli F, Brandi ML. (2012) Clinical practice guidelines for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 97(9):2990-3011.

Early Rule-Out Summary

This topic passed the early rule out stage

Findings of Early Rule-Out Assessment

  1. Is there a qualifying resource, such as a practice guideline or systematic review, for the genetic condition?
  2. Does the practice guideline or systematic review indicate that the result is actionable in one or more of the following ways?
  3. a. Patient Management

    b. Surveillance or Screening

    c. Circumstances to Avoid

  4. Is it actionable in an undiagnosed adult with the condition?
  5. Is this condition an important health problem?
  6. Is there at least on known pathogenic variant with at least moderate penetrance (≥40%) or moderate relative risk (≥2) in any population?