Actionability Assertions

Gene Condition (MONDO ID) OMIM ID Final Assertion
RYR1 malignant hyperthermia of anesthesia (0018493) 145600 Strong Actionability
CACNA1S malignant hyperthermia of anesthesia (0018493) 601887 Strong Actionability

Actionability Assertion Rationale

  • All experts agreed with the assertion of strong as computed according to the rubric. Though there was a lack of evidence on penetrance and effectiveness, we recognize that defining penetrance and measuring effectiveness of avoidance of the triggering anesthetics in this condition would be a challenge. Though penetrance data was not available for CACNA1S, the potential actionability based on severity and available effective intervention is consistent with strong actionability.

Actionability Scores

Outcome / Intervention Pair Severity Likelihood Effectiveness Nature of Intervention Total Score
Malignant hyperthermia event / Avoidance of triggering anesthetics 2 3C 3B 3 11CB
Malignant hyperthermia event / Awareness of high-risk situations 2 3C 0D 3 8CD
View scoring key
Domain of Actionability Scoring Metric State of the Knowledgebase
Severity: What is the nature of the threat to health to an individual? 3 = Sudden death as a reasonably possible outcome
2 = Reasonable possibility of death or major morbidity
1 = Modest morbidity
0 = Minimal or no morbidity
N/A
Likelihood: What is the chance that the outcome will occur? 3 = >40% chance
2 = 5%-39% chance
1 = 1%-4% chance
0 = <1% chance
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Effectiveness: What is the effectiveness of a specific intervention in preventing or diminishing the risk of harm? 3 = Highly effective
2 = Moderately effective
1 = Minimally effective
0 = Controversial or unknown effectiveness
IN = Ineffective/No interventiona
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Nature of intervention: How risky, medically burdensome, or intensive is the intervention? 3 = Low risk, or medically acceptable and low intensity
2 = Moderate risk, moderately acceptable or intensive
1 = Greater risk, less acceptable and substantial intensity
0 = High risk, poorly acceptable or intensive
N/A
a Do not score the remaining categories

Prevalence of the Genetic Condition

The incidence of malignant hyperthermia (MH) is best described by the reported incidence per anesthetic. Incidence estimates for MH range from 1/3000 to 1/500,000 anesthetics. Most report an incidence of about 1/10,000 anesthetics in children and 1/50,000 in adults. MHS has an estimated prevalence of 1/60,000-1/100,000. The prevalence of MH in individuals undergoing surgery in New York state hospitals was estimated as 1/100,000 for adults and 3/100,000 children. However, as many individuals undergoing surgery who experience marked hyperthermia may be coded as being MH susceptible, the exact incidence and prevalence has been difficult to clarify. It seems certain that there are more than 1,000 cases of MH in the US each year.
View Citations

H Rosenberg, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1146, Rosenberg H, et al. (2011) PMID: 21248738, Gurunluoglu R, et al. (2009) PMID: 20827241, Malignant hyperthermia. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 423., Hosokawa Y, et al. (2017) PMID: 28430550, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2017) OMIM: 145600, Safety Committee of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists, et al. (2017) PMID: 28246924, Urman RD, et al. (2019) PMID: 31166228

Clinical Features (Signs / symptoms)

MH susceptibility (MHS) is a pharmacogenetic skeletal muscle disorder where exposure to certain volatile anesthetics (i.e., desflurane, enflurane, halothane, isoflurane, sevoflurane), either alone or with a depolarizing muscle relaxant (succinylcholine), may trigger uncontrolled skeletal muscle hypermetabolism. An MH episode may begin with hypercapnia, rapidly rising end-tidal CO2, and tachycardia followed by hyperthermia. Additional symptoms may include acidosis, muscle rigidity, compartment syndrome, rhabdomyolysis and subsequent increased creatine kinase, hyperkalemia with a risk for cardiac arrhythmia or even arrest, and myoglobinuria with a risk for renal failure.

There is mounting evidence that some individuals with MHS may also develop episodes triggered by non-anesthetic conditions such as heat and/or exercise. These non-anesthetic-induced episodes, often called MH-like syndrome, may manifest as exertional rhabdomyolysis (ER). Clinical features are similar to MH and include muscle cramps, elevated temperature, tachycardia, tachypnea, hyperkalemia, and elevated levels of serum myoglobin and creatine kinase. Reports of heat and exercise-induced MH-like reactions in patients with MHS and patients with ER who test positive for MH support an association, though more evidence is needed.
View Citations

H Rosenberg, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1146, Gurunluoglu R, et al. (2009) PMID: 20827241, Malignant hyperthermia. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 423., Hosokawa Y, et al. (2017) PMID: 28430550, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2017) OMIM: 145600, Safety Committee of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists, et al. (2017) PMID: 28246924, Kraeva N, et al. (2017) PMID: 28326467, Litman RS, et al. (2019) PMID: 30768455, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2020) OMIM: 601887

Natural History (Important subgroups & survival / recovery)

In nearly all cases, the first manifestations of MH occurs during anesthetization in the operating room, though manifestations may also occur within an hour or so of anesthesia termination. MH presentation can vary depending on the triggering agents and environmental factors, such as metabolic state and body temperature, at the beginning of anesthesia. Without proper and prompt treatment with dantrolene, mortality is extremely high, up to 80%. Even with treatment and survival, the individual is at risk for life-threatening consequences and recurrence of the syndrome within the first 24-36 hours following an episode. A study of the North American MH registry showed that nonfatal complications occurred in 35% of affected cases reported from 1987 to 2006. Complications included cardiac, renal, or hepatic dysfunction; coma or change in consciousness; pulmonary edema; and disseminated intravascular coagulation. A significant male preponderance has been reported. All ethnicities are affected.
View Citations

H Rosenberg, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1146, Gurunluoglu R, et al. (2009) PMID: 20827241, Malignant hyperthermia. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 423., Hosokawa Y, et al. (2017) PMID: 28430550, Safety Committee of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists, et al. (2017) PMID: 28246924

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Dominant
View Citations

H Rosenberg, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1146, Gurunluoglu R, et al. (2009) PMID: 20827241, Malignant hyperthermia. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 423., Hosokawa Y, et al. (2017) PMID: 28430550, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2017) OMIM: 145600, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2020) OMIM: 601887

Prevalence of Genetic Variants

>1-2 in 100
Pathogenic variants in RYR1 are identified in up to 50-75% of MHS cases, while pathogenic variants in CACNA1S account for about 1% of cases.
Tier 3 View Citations

H Rosenberg, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1146, Hosokawa Y, et al. (2017) PMID: 28430550, Safety Committee of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists, et al. (2017) PMID: 28246924

>1-2 in 100
A systematic review identified MH-related pathogenic variants in RYR1 and CACNA1S in 78% of patients with a history of ER.
Tier 1 View Citations

Kraeva N, et al. (2017) PMID: 28326467

1-2 in 500
For RYR1, one study identified a prevalence of 0.46% (4/870) for MHS-related RYR1 pathogenic variants. In a second study, based on genetic variation data of more than 60,000 individuals, the combined prevalence of MHS-related RYR1 pathogenic variants was estimated as 1/2750.
Tier 3 View Citations

H Rosenberg, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1146, Hosokawa Y, et al. (2017) PMID: 28430550

1-2 in 500
One study used RYR1 and CACNA1S genomic databases to estimate the prevalence of an MHS-related pathogenic variant as 1/1556.
Tier 3 View Citations

H Rosenberg, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1146

Penetrance (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

>= 40 %
In a multicenter case-control study from 125 MH pedigrees, the overall penetrance for RYR1-related MHS was 40.6%. Penetrance was based on the number of probands who were survivors of an MH event among all genotype-positives who had at least one exposure to a triggering anesthetic. Proband median age was 12 years. Penetrance in males was significantly higher than in females (50% vs. 29.7%, p=0.002).
Tier 3 View Citations

H Rosenberg, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1146

Unknown
The penetrance of MHS associated with CACNA1S is unknown.
Tier Not provided

Relative Risk (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
Information on relative risk was not available.

Expressivity

An MH episode may not occur with every exposure to "trigger" agents. Clinical manifestation may depend on genetic predisposition, dose of trigger agents, or duration of exposure.
Tier 4 View Citations

H Rosenberg, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1146

A genetically susceptible patient may manifest clinical signs at any point in their life.
Tier 3 View Citations

Hosokawa Y, et al. (2017) PMID: 28430550

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Patient Management

The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) has developed an ACT sheet to help clinical decision-making following identification of RYR1 and/or CACNA1S pathogenic variant(s) as a secondary finding: https://www.acmg.net/PDFLibrary/Malignant-Hyperthermia.pdf
Surgical management recommendations include preparation of the anesthesia workstation to reduce or prevent exposure to triggering anesthetics (e.g., remove vaporizers from machine and replace all disposables), vigilant monitoring for signs and symptoms of MH during perioperative period, and close observation and monitoring postoperatively.
Tier 3 View Citations

Safety Committee of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists, et al. (2017) PMID: 28246924, Urman RD, et al. (2019) PMID: 31166228

If a pregnant woman with MHS requires non-emergent surgery, a non-triggering anesthetic (local, nerve block, epidural, spinal anesthesia or a total intravenous general anesthetic) should be administered. Continuous epidural analgesia is highly recommended for labor and delivery. If a Cesarean delivery is indicated in a woman who does not have an epidural catheter in place, neuraxial (spinal, epidural, or combined spinalepidural) anesthesia is recommended, if not otherwise contraindicated. If a general anesthetic is indicated, a total intravenous anesthetic technique should be administered, with an anesthesia machine that has been prepared for an MH-susceptible individual.
Tier 4 View Citations

H Rosenberg, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1146

MHS patients should carry identification of their susceptibility and inform those responsible for their care of their MH status.
Tier 2 View Citations

Litman RS, et al. (2019) PMID: 30768455

Circumstances to Avoid

Do not use the following MH triggering drugs for MHS patients: inhaled general anesthetics (desflurane, enflurane, halothane, isoflurane, sevoflurane) and depolarizing muscle relaxants (succinylcholine).
Tier 2 View Citations

Gurunluoglu R, et al. (2009) PMID: 20827241, Safety Committee of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists, et al. (2017) PMID: 28246924, Urman RD, et al. (2019) PMID: 31166228

MHS patients who have not experienced adverse effects of heat and exercise should not restrict their activity. However, athletes with MHS should develop an MH-specific emergency action plan and prepare an on-site cooling plan. Athletes with MHS should not exercise alone and should notify their medical providers (e.g., athletic trainer, team physician) about the condition. Those who have experienced adverse effects of heat or exercise should restrict their activity based on their own experience.
Tier 2 View Citations

Hosokawa Y, et al. (2017) PMID: 28430550, Litman RS, et al. (2019) PMID: 30768455

In individuals with MH undergoing cardiac bypass surgery, aggressive rewarming should be avoided, as it is associated with development of clinical signs of MH.
Tier 3 View Citations

H Rosenberg, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1146

Serotonin antagonist (5HT3-antagonist) antiemetics should be used cautiously. Sudden death was reported in a child with multiminicore disease caused by a pathogenic variant in RYR1 after receiving a therapeutic dose of ondansetron.
Tier 3 View Citations

H Rosenberg, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1146

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Nature of Intervention

The interventions identified include avoidance of certain anesthetic agents and potential avoidance of heat and heavy exercise. These interventions are mildly burdensome and pose minimal risk.
Context: Adult Pediatric

Chance to Escape Clinical Detection

Under usual care, a patient may be exposed to a triggering anesthetic agent which could result in high morbidity or potential mortality. However, it should be noted that modern anesthetic care and monitoring often allow early detection of MH.
Context: Adult Pediatric
Tier 4 View Citations

H Rosenberg, et al. (2003) NCBI: NBK1146

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Gene Condition Associations
OMIM Identifier Primary MONDO Identifier Additional MONDO Identifiers
RYR1 145600 0018493 0007783
CACNA1S 601887 0018493 0011163

References List

Gurunluoglu R, Swanson JA, Haeck PC. (2009) Evidence-based patient safety advisory: malignant hyperthermia. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 124(4 Suppl):68S-81S.

H Rosenberg, N Sambuughin, S Riazi, R Dirksen. Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility. (2003) [Updated Jan 31 2013]. In: RA Pagon, MP Adam, HH Ardinger, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1146/

Hosokawa Y, Casa DJ, Rosenberg H, Capacchione JF, Sagui E, Riazi S, Belval LN, Deuster PA, Jardine JF, Kavouras SA, Lee EC, Miller KC, Muldoon SM, O'Connor FG, Sailor SR, Sambuughin N, Stearns RL, Adams WM, Huggins RA, Vandermark LW. (2017) Round Table on Malignant Hyperthermia in Physically Active Populations: Meeting Proceedings. Journal of athletic training. 52(1938-162X):377-383.

Kraeva N, Sapa A, Dowling JJ, Riazi S. (2017) Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility in patients with exertional rhabdomyolysis: a retrospective cohort study and updated systematic review. Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie. 64(1496-8975):736-743.

Litman RS, Smith VI, Larach MG, Mayes L, Shukry M, Theroux MC, Watt S, Wong CA. (2019) Consensus Statement of the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States on Unresolved Clinical Questions Concerning the Management of Patients With Malignant Hyperthermia. Anesthesia and analgesia. 128(1526-7598):652-659.

MALIGNANT HYPERTHERMIA, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO, 1; MHS1. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 145600, (2017) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

MALIGNANT HYPERTHERMIA, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO, 5; MHS5. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 601887, (2020) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

Malignant hyperthermia. Orphanet encyclopedia, http://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=en&Expert=423

Rosenberg H, Rueffert H. (2011) Clinical utility gene card for: malignant hyperthermia. European journal of human genetics : EJHG. 19(6).

Safety Committee of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. (2017) JSA guideline for the management of malignant hyperthermia crisis 2016. Journal of anesthesia. 31(1438-8359):307-317.

Urman RD, Rajan N, Belani K, Gayer S, Joshi GP. (2019) Malignant Hyperthermia-Susceptible Adult Patient and Ambulatory Surgery Center: Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia and Ambulatory Surgical Care Committee of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Position Statement. Anesthesia and analgesia. 129(1526-7598):347-349.

Early Rule-Out Summary

This topic passed the early rule out stage

Findings of Early Rule-Out Assessment

  1. Is there a qualifying resource, such as a practice guideline or systematic review, for the genetic condition?
  2. Does the practice guideline or systematic review indicate that the result is actionable in one or more of the following ways?
  3. a. Patient Management

    b. Surveillance or Screening

    c. Circumstances to Avoid

  4. Is it actionable in an undiagnosed adult with the condition?
  5. Is this condition an important health problem?
  6. Is there at least on known pathogenic variant with at least moderate penetrance (≥40%) or moderate relative risk (≥2) in any population?