Actionability Assertions

Gene Condition (MONDO ID) OMIM ID Final Assertion
No assertions found.

Actionability Assertion Rationale

  • This topic was initially scored prior to development of the process for making actionability assertions. The Actionability Working Group decided to defer making an assertion until after the topic could be reviewed through the update process.

Actionability Scores

Outcome / Intervention Pair Severity Likelihood Effectiveness Nature of Intervention Total Score
High cholesterol / Statins 2 3C 3A 3 11CA
View scoring key
Domain of Actionability Scoring Metric State of the Knowledgebase
Severity: What is the nature of the threat to health to an individual? 3 = Sudden death as a reasonably possible outcome
2 = Reasonable possibility of death or major morbidity
1 = Modest morbidity
0 = Minimal or no morbidity
N/A
Likelihood: What is the chance that the outcome will occur? 3 = >40% chance
2 = 5%-39% chance
1 = 1%-4% chance
0 = <1% chance
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Effectiveness: What is the effectiveness of a specific intervention in preventing or diminishing the risk of harm? 3 = Highly effective
2 = Moderately effective
1 = Minimally effective
0 = Controversial or unknown effectiveness
IN = Ineffective/No interventiona
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Nature of intervention: How risky, medically burdensome, or intensive is the intervention? 3 = Low risk, or medically acceptable and low intensity
2 = Moderate risk, moderately acceptable or intensive
1 = Greater risk, less acceptable and substantial intensity
0 = High risk, poorly acceptable or intensive
N/A
a Do not score the remaining categories

Prevalence of the Genetic Condition

The prevalence of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) is estimated as 1/200 to 1/300.
View Citations

Goldberg AC, et al. (2011) PMID: 21600525, (2008) URL: www.nice.org.uk., E Youngblom, et al. (2014) NCBI: NBK174884

Clinical Features (Signs / symptoms)

HeFH is characterized by elevated levels of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease (CVD), and tendon xanthomas. Untreated, LDL-C concentrations are typically in the range of 190-350 mg/dL. CVD includes both coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke, though CHD is the more common CVD while stroke occurs rarely. Presentation of CHD may include angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, and peripheral vascular disease. Corneal arcus is also common.
View Citations

Goldberg AC, et al. (2011) PMID: 21600525, (2008) URL: www.nice.org.uk., E Youngblom, et al. (2014) NCBI: NBK174884, (2007) URL: www.sign.ac.uk., Oosterveer DM, et al. (2009) PMID: 19439299, (2002) PMID: 12485966

Natural History (Important subgroups & survival / recovery)

In HeFH, a raised LDL-C concentration is present during childhood and may lead to early development of atherosclerosis and CHD, even in the absence of other risk factors for coronary disease. Untreated males have a 50% risk of CHD by age 50 with onset typically in their 30s and 40s while untreated women have at least a 30% risk by the age of 60 with onset typically in their 40s and 50s. HeFH patients with tendon xanthomas have higher risk of CVD compared to FH patients without xanthomas.
View Citations

Goldberg AC, et al. (2011) PMID: 21600525, (2008) URL: www.nice.org.uk., E Youngblom, et al. (2014) NCBI: NBK174884, (2007) URL: www.sign.ac.uk., Oosterveer DM, et al. (2009) PMID: 19439299, (2002) PMID: 12485966

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Codominant

Prevalence of Genetic Variants

1-2 in 500
Genetic mutations associated with HeFH have been estimated in Dutch population as 1/137-1/244.
Tier 5 View Citations

Benn M, et al. (2012) PMID: 22893714, Sjouke B, et al. (2015) PMID: 24585268

Penetrance (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

>= 40 %
Males have a 50% risk of CHD by age 50 while women have a 30% risk by the age of 60.
Tier 3 View Citations

E Youngblom, et al. (2014) NCBI: NBK174884

>= 40 %
Locus and allele specific penetrance varies for elevated LDL-C levels. High penetrance, up to 90%, has been noted for patients heterozygous with mutations in LDLR and incomplete penetrance for patients heterozygous for mutations in APOB. The penetrance associated with most mutations in PCSK9 is unclear, though patients heterozygous for the Ser127Arg variant have 90% penetrance and patients heterozygous for the Asp374Tyr variant have high penetrance.
Tier 3 View Citations

E Youngblom, et al. (2014) NCBI: NBK174884

Relative Risk (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
Information on relative risk associated with HeFH was unavailable.

Expressivity

Expression is variable, with some individuals with HeFH having no detectable signs of disease.
Tier 4 View Citations

E Youngblom, et al. (2014) NCBI: NBK174884

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Patient Management

Patients should consider lifelong, high-intensity statin therapy beginning in children aged 8 or older, although it may be administered to younger patients in special cases.
Tier 1 View Citations

(2008) URL: www.nice.org.uk., (2007) URL: www.sign.ac.uk.

These recommendations have been confirmed in more recent guidelines which base recommendations on elevated cholesterol levels without regard to specific etiology such as FH.
Tier 5 View Citations

(2013) URL: circ.ahajournals.org.

In a study of 2146 patients with FH, patients taking statins were shown to reduce their risk of coronary heart disease by 76% compared to untreated patients.
Tier 5 View Citations

Versmissen J, et al. (2008) PMID: 19001495

Patients should consider taking daily aspirin or other proven similarly effective drug if aspirin is contraindicated. Among patients with a history of atherosclerotic disease, aspirin has been shown to reduce all-cause mortality by 18%, number of strokes by 20%, myocardial infarctions by 30%, and other vascular events by 30%. Among patients without a history of atherosclerotic disease, aspirin has been shown to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction by 30%. However, evidence of effectiveness of aspirin in patients with FH was not provided.
Tier 1 View Citations

(2007) URL: www.sign.ac.uk.

High blood pressure and diabetes are additional risk factors for CHD and should be treated aggressively.
Tier 2 View Citations

Goldberg AC, et al. (2011) PMID: 21600525, (2012) URL: www.guideline.gov.

Surveillance

A baseline electrocardiogram should be considered
Tier 2 View Citations

(2008) URL: www.nice.org.uk.

Lipid levels should be measured every 12 months.
Tier 2 View Citations

(2012) URL: www.guideline.gov.

Blood pressure should be monitored every 6 to 12 weeks.
Tier 2 View Citations

(2012) URL: www.guideline.gov.

Circumstances to Avoid

Patients should avoid additional risk factors for CHD, including smoking, physical inactivity, diets high in saturated fats and cholesterol, unhealthy body weight, and excessive alcohol consumption.
Tier 2 View Citations

Goldberg AC, et al. (2011) PMID: 21600525, (2008) URL: www.nice.org.uk.

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Nature of Intervention

The identified action items for this disorder include surveillance (echocardiogram), clinical monitoring (blood pressure and lipid levels) and medication use (statins and aspirin), which are likely associated with mild to moderate risk and burden.
Context: Adult

Chance to Escape Clinical Detection

HeFH is associated with early onset elevated cholesterol levels and CHD, which are not typically screened for in younger adult populations, thus this disorder would likely escape clinical detection given typical clinical care.
Context: Adult
Tier 3 View Citations

E Youngblom, et al. (2014) NCBI: NBK174884

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Gene Condition Associations
OMIM Identifier Primary MONDO Identifier Additional MONDO Identifiers

References List

(2002) Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. 106(25):3143-421.

2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. (2013) URL: http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/early/2013/11/11/01.cir.0000437738.63853.7a

Benn M, Watts GF, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. (2012) Familial hypercholesterolemia in the danish general population: prevalence, coronary artery disease, and cholesterol-lowering medication. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 97(11):3956-64.

E Youngblom, JW Knowles. Familial Hypercholesterolemia. (2014) . In: RA Pagon, MP Adam, HH Ardinger, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK174884/

Goldberg AC, Hopkins PN, Toth PP, Ballantyne CM, Rader DJ, Robinson JG, Daniels SR, Gidding SS, de Ferranti SD, Ito MK, McGowan MP, Moriarty PM, Cromwell WC, Ross JL, Ziajka PE. (2011) Familial hypercholesterolemia: screening, diagnosis and management of pediatric and adult patients: clinical guidance from the National Lipid Association Expert Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Journal of clinical lipidology. 5(3 Suppl):S1-8.

Identification and management of familial hypercholesterolaemia. NICE (2008) URL: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg71

Oosterveer DM, Versmissen J, Yazdanpanah M, Hamza TH, Sijbrands EJ. (2009) Differences in characteristics and risk of cardiovascular disease in familial hypercholesterolemia patients with and without tendon xanthomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis. 207(2):311-7.

Prevention of vascular and metabolic disease. Guidelines for preventive activities in general practice, 8th edition. NCG (2012) URL: http://www.guideline.gov/content.aspx?id=43854

Risk estimation and the prevention of cardiovascular disease. A national clinical guideline. Edinburgh (Scotland) Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. SIGN (2007) URL: http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/97/

Sjouke B, Kusters DM, Kindt I, Besseling J, Defesche JC, Sijbrands EJ, Roeters van Lennep JE, Stalenhoef AF, Wiegman A, de Graaf J, Fouchier SW, Kastelein JJ, Hovingh GK. (2015) Homozygous autosomal dominant hypercholesterolaemia in the Netherlands: prevalence, genotype-phenotype relationship, and clinical outcome. European heart journal. 36(9):560-5.

Versmissen J, Oosterveer DM, Yazdanpanah M, Defesche JC, Basart DC, Liem AH, Heeringa J, Witteman JC, Lansberg PJ, Kastelein JJ, Sijbrands EJ. (2008) Efficacy of statins in familial hypercholesterolaemia: a long term cohort study. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 337:a2423.

Early Rule-Out Summary

This topic passed the early rule out stage

Findings of Early Rule-Out Assessment

  1. Is there a qualifying resource, such as a practice guideline or systematic review, for the genetic condition?
  2. Does the practice guideline or systematic review indicate that the result is actionable in one or more of the following ways?
  3. a. Patient Management

    b. Surveillance or Screening

    c. Circumstances to Avoid

  4. Is it actionable in an undiagnosed adult with the condition?
  5. Is this condition an important health problem?
  6. Is there at least on known pathogenic variant with at least moderate penetrance (≥40%) or moderate relative risk (≥2) in any population?