Adult Summary Report Secondary Findings in Adult Subjects Non-diagnostic, excludes newborn screening & prenatal testing/screening Permalink A Current Version Rule-Out Dashboard Release History Status (Adult): Passed (Consensus scoring is Complete) Curation Status (Adult): Released 1.0.2
GENE/GENE PANEL:
APC
Condition:
Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
Mode(s) of Inheritance:
Autosomal Dominant
Actionability Assertion
Gene Condition Pairs(s)
Final Assertion
APC⇔175100
Assertion Pending
Actionability Rationale
This topic was initially scored prior to development of the process for making actionability assertions. The Actionability Working Group decided to defer making an assertion until after the topic could be reviewed through the update process.
Final Consensus Scoresa
Outcome / Intervention Pair
Severity
Likelihood
Effectiveness
Nature of the
Intervention
Intervention
Total
Score
Score
Colorectal Cancer / Colectomy
2
3A
1
2B
1
8AB
1.
Scores where the tier of evidence recommendation of the Working Group differs from the evidence level tier Summary Report.
a.
To see the scoring key, please go to : https://www.clinicalgenome.org/site/assets/files/2180/actionability_sq_metric.png
Topic
Narrative Description of Evidence
Ref
1. What is the nature of the threat to health for an individual carrying a deleterious allele?
Prevalence of the Genetic Condition
Clinical Features
(Signs / symptoms)
(Signs / symptoms)
Natural History
(Important subgroups & survival / recovery)
(Important subgroups & survival / recovery)
Colorectal adenomatous polyps begin to appear, on average, by age 16. By age 35, 95% of FAP patients have polyps. In virtually all cases, the adenomas will develop into CRC if left untreated. The mean age of CRC diagnosis in untreated individuals is 39 years; 93% of untreated patients develop CRC by age 50.
2. How effective are interventions for preventing harm?
Information on the effectiveness of the recommendations below was not provided unless otherwise stated.
Information on the effectiveness of the recommendations below was not provided unless otherwise stated.
Patient Management
It is recommended that carriers of the APC mutation be referred for genetic counseling, and be followed by a GI specialist.
(Tier 2)
Prophylactic (procto)colectomy is recommended when the number and size of the polyps impede surveillance of the colon. The chance of rectal carcinoma after ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) is estimated to be 12-43%, depending on endoscopic surveillance. The chance of adenomas in the pouch following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) ranges from 8-62%, depending on surveillance.
(Tier 2)
Non-aspirin NSAIDs may be effective for reducing the number and size of colorectal polyps and adenomas in individuals with FAP. NSAIDs use has resulted in a 7-30% decrease in rectal polyps following IRA.
(Tier 1)
Registry-based screening of individuals with FAP has been shown to lead to a reduction in CRC incidence and CRC-related mortality. Odds ratios for CRC incidence following registration range from 0.09-0.44. Odds ratios for CRC-related mortality range from 0.11-0.22.
(Tier 1)
Surveillance
Endoscopic surveillance for colorectal polyps, adenomas, and/or CRC is recommended annually or semi-annually, until colectomy. CRC incidence was found to be 3-10% among cases identified through surveillance, compared to 50-70% in symptomatic FAP cases.
(Tier 2)
Regular endoscopic surveillance of the duodenum is advised. However, the efficacy of this surveillance in reducing CRC incidence is not known.
(Tier 1)
Additional surveillance may include: annual thyroid exam, annual physical exam with a focus on central nervous system disorders, annual abdominal palpation. However, these screening methods have not been shown to be effective in reducing CRC incidence.
(Tier 2)
Circumstances to Avoid
No circumstances-to-avoid recommendations have been provided for the Adult context.
3. What is the chance that this threat will materialize?
Mode of Inheritance
Autosomal Dominant
Prevalence of Genetic Variants
Penetrance
(Include any high risk racial or ethnic subgroups)
(Include any high risk racial or ethnic subgroups)
Relative Risk
(Include any high risk racial or ethnic subgroups)
(Include any high risk racial or ethnic subgroups)
No relative risk estimates were identified.
Expressivity
Development of colorectal adenomas is variable, including variability in the number of adenomas within families with the same APC mutation; 50% of patients have polyps by age 15-16, and 95% by 35 years of age. The presence of duodenal adenomas ranges from 33-92%; 26-51% of FAP patients develop stomach polyps.
(Tier 3)
Desmoid tumors occur in 10-25% of FAP cases.
(Tier 3)
Both inter- and intrafamilial phenotypic variability are common.
(Tier 3)
4. What is the Nature of the Intervention?
Nature of Intervention
NSAIDs may be associated with an increased risk of serious cardiovascular events, particularly in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors. NSAIDs can also cause upper gastrointestinal toxicity.
There is a small but appreciable risk of complications from colonoscopy including perforation, bleeding, and death.
(Procto)Colectomy is associated with possible intra- and post-operative complications.
5. Would the underlying risk or condition escape detection prior to harm in the setting of recommended care?
Chance to Escape Clinical Detection
General population CRC screening is recommended at age 50. Given the early age of development of adenomas and CRC in FAP patients, general population screening would not allow for prophylactic measures to be taken.
(Tier 1)
Description of sources of evidence:
Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review, or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Date of Search:
05.13.2014
Reference List
1.
Colon and Rectum Cancer..
National Cancer Institute, SEER Stat Fact Sheets, US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. 2-24-2014..
(2014)
Website: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html
2.
Association of Comprehensive Cancer Centres. Hereditary colorectal cancer. Amsterdam, The Netherlands Association of Comprehensive Cancer Centres.
Other.
(2009)
Website: https://www.guidelinecentral.com/summaries/hereditary-colorectal-cancer/
3.
Systematic review of the impact of registration and screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in familial adenomatous polyposis and Lynch syndrome.
Br J Surg.
(2013)
100(13):1719-31.
.
4.
Guidelines for the clinical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).
Gut.
(2008)
57(5):704-13.
.
5.
Colorectal Screening for Cancer Prevention in Asymptomatic Patients.
Other.
(2013)
Website: http://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/health/practitioner-pro/bc-guidelines/colorectal_screening.pdf
6.
Familial adenomatous polyposis.
Orphanet encyclopedia,
http://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=en&Expert=733
7.
Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
FAMILIAL ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS 1; FAP1.
MIM: 175100:
2016 Aug 31.
World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org.
8.
APC-Associated Polyposis Conditions.
1998 Dec 18
[Updated 2014 Mar 27].
In: RA Pagon, MP Adam, HH Ardinger, et al., editors.
GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2024.
Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1345
9.
Risk factors predicting desmoid occurrence in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: a meta-analysis.
Colorectal Dis.
(2011)
13(11):1222-9.
.
10.
Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Other.
(2013)
Website: https://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/colorectal_screening.pdf&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwiXjIKKne7KAhVW8WMKHUGaDQ0QFggEMAA&client=internal-uds-cse&usg=AFQjCNEBO4lGlL14PJhntw-PBiiCaGupJg
11.
Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002).
Gut.
(2010)
59(5):666-89.
.
12.
Practice parameters for the treatment of patients with dominantly inherited colorectal cancer (familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer).
Dis Colon Rectum.
(2003)
46(8):1001-12.
.
13.
American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected].
Am J Gastroenterol.
(2009)
104(3):739-50.
.
14.
Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and Aspirin for preventing colorectal adenomas and carcinomas.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
(2004(2):CD004079)
.
15.
Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.
Health Technol Assess.
(2010)
14(32):1-206.
.
16.
Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Other.
(2012)
Website: https://www.icsi.org/guidelines__more/catalog_guidelines_and_more/catalog_guidelines/catalog_prevention__screening_guidelines/colorectal/
17.
Guidelines for preventive activities in general practice Colorectal cancer (CRC).
Other.
(2012)
Website: http://www.racgp.org.au/your-practice/guidelines/redbook/early-detection-of-cancers/colorectal-cancer-%28crc%29/
18.
Diagnosis and Management of Colorectal Cancer.
SIGN.
(2015)
Website: http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign126.pdf
19.
Practice parameter for the detection of colorectal neoplasms: an interim report (revised).
Dis Colon Rectum.
(2006)
49(3):299-301.
.
20.
Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence.
Gastroenterology.
(2003)
124(2):544-60.
.