Actionability Assertions

Gene Condition (MONDO ID) OMIM ID Final Assertion
No assertions found.

Actionability Assertion Rationale

  • This topic was initially scored prior to development of the process for making actionability assertions. The Actionability Working Group decided to defer making an assertion until after the topic could be reviewed through the update process.

Actionability Scores

Outcome / Intervention Pair Severity Likelihood Effectiveness Nature of Intervention Total Score
Sudden cardiac death / ICD implantation 3 2C 2A 2 9CA
Sudden cardiac death / Anti-arrhythmic therapy 3 2C 1C 2 8CC
View scoring key
Domain of Actionability Scoring Metric State of the Knowledgebase
Severity: What is the nature of the threat to health to an individual? 3 = Sudden death as a reasonably possible outcome
2 = Reasonable possibility of death or major morbidity
1 = Modest morbidity
0 = Minimal or no morbidity
N/A
Likelihood: What is the chance that the outcome will occur? 3 = >40% chance
2 = 5%-39% chance
1 = 1%-4% chance
0 = <1% chance
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Effectiveness: What is the effectiveness of a specific intervention in preventing or diminishing the risk of harm? 3 = Highly effective
2 = Moderately effective
1 = Minimally effective
0 = Controversial or unknown effectiveness
IN = Ineffective/No interventiona
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Nature of intervention: How risky, medically burdensome, or intensive is the intervention? 3 = Low risk, or medically acceptable and low intensity
2 = Moderate risk, moderately acceptable or intensive
1 = Greater risk, less acceptable and substantial intensity
0 = High risk, poorly acceptable or intensive
N/A
a Do not score the remaining categories

Prevalence of the Genetic Condition

The prevalence is estimated to be approximately 1 per 1,000 to 5,000 individuals in the general population worldwide. Higher numbers may be found in specific regions.
View Citations

Te Rijdt WP, et al. (2014) PMID: 23736219, Gollob MH, et al. (2011) PMID: 21459272, E McNally, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1131

Clinical Features (Signs / symptoms)

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia or cardiomyopathy (here referred to as ARVD) is characterized by structural and functional abnormalities of the right ventricle, with or without concomitant left ventricular disease. Clinical diagnosis is based on demonstration of characteristic electrocardiogram (ECG), arrhythmic, structural, and/or histological abnormalities along with family history of sudden cardiac death (SCD) or a disease-causing mutation.
View Citations

Ackerman MJ, et al. (2011) PMID: 21787999, E McNally, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1131, Marcus FI, et al. (2010) PMID: 20172912, Te Rijdt WP, et al. (2014) PMID: 23736219

Natural History (Important subgroups & survival / recovery)

Age of onset is highly variable with a mean age of diagnosis of 31 years and a range of 4 to 64 years. Among 100 ARVD patients from a US registry, the most common presenting symptoms were palpitations, syncope, and sudden cardiac death in 27%, 26%, and 23% of patients, respectively. Estimates of the annual incidence of SCD vary from 0.08% to 9%. In the early 'concealed' phase, individuals are often asymptomatic, but may still be at risk of SCD, especially during exertion. However, SCD with no apparent provocation is not uncommon. In the symptomatic phase, individuals present with arrhythmias and right ventricular morphological abnormalities discernible by conventional imaging. Later, diffuse disease may result in heart failure while ventricular arrhythmias may or may not be present.
View Citations

Ackerman MJ, et al. (2011) PMID: 21787999, E McNally, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1131, Garratt CJ, et al. (2010) PMID: 20663787, Marcus FI, et al. (2010) PMID: 20172912, Zipes DP, et al. (2006) PMID: 16923744

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Dominant

Autosomal recessive has also been described. Up to 57% of persons with ARVD have been shown to have compound heterozygosity or digenic heterozygosity.

View Citations

E McNally, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1131, Garratt CJ, et al. (2010) PMID: 20663787

Prevalence of Genetic Variants

>1-2 in 100
Overall yield of genetic testing for all available genes in probands who meet diagnostic criteria for ARVD approximates 50% with the majority of mutations (11-51%) occurring in PKP2. Exceptions include a founder mutation in the TMEM43 gene in the Newfoundland, Canada population.Information on the prevalence of genetic mutations associated with ARVD in the general population was not available.
Tier 3 View Citations

E McNally, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1131, Te Rijdt WP, et al. (2014) PMID: 23736219

Penetrance (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

>= 40 %
In a study of 35 PKP2 mutation carriers among 9 unrelated families (including probands) 49% met criteria for ARVD. Excluding probands, 31% were clinically diagnosed with ARVD. (Tier 3)Clinical evaluation of 24 family members of 9 probands, all with DSG2 mutations, demonstrated penetrance of 58 to 75% depending on diagnostic criteria. (Tier 3)In 15 unrelated families from Newfoundland, penetrance was 100% in males and females carrying the S358L variant in the TMEM43 gene by ages 63 and 76 years, respectively. (Tier 3)In a single family with DSP mutation carriers, penetrance was estimated at 50%. (Tier 3)Penetrance is age-related and often incomplete as late as 50-60 years of age. (Tier 3)
Tier Not provided View Citations

Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2015) OMIM: 610193, Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. (2013) OMIM: 604400, Charron P, et al. (2010) PMID: 20823110, Dalal D, et al. (2005) PMID: 16344387, E McNally, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1131

5-39 %
Information on the penetrance of SCD is limited. In a study of 130 probands fulfilling clinical criteria for ARVD, there were 7 SCDs (4.4%) over a mean followup of 8 years. In a study of 100 persons in 9 families with genetically confirmed ARVD (diagnosed clinically or via autopsy), 31 experienced sudden cardiac death. In a study of 11 families with members at risk for mutations in TMEM43, 31% of 197 individuals at high risk of a mutation died of SCD. In these last two studies, no time frame for observation was provided. (Tier 3)Studies of genetic variation in ARVD-related genes in healthy population controls suggest that variants that would be considered rare and pathogenic may be common and penetrance depends on type of mutation.
Tier 3 View Citations

E McNally, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1131

Relative Risk (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
Information on relative risk was not available.

Expressivity

Disease expression is variable with regard to age at onset and severity.
Tier 3 View Citations

Ackerman MJ, et al. (2011) PMID: 21787999, Charron P, et al. (2010) PMID: 20823110, Marcus FI, et al. (2010) PMID: 20172912

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Patient Management

Antiarrhythmic medication (beta-blockers, the anti-arrhythmic beta-blocker sotalol, amiodarone) can be used to prevent ventricular arrhythmias. In one study of patients with ARVD neither beta blocker therapy (n=58) nor sotalol (n=38) were protective against ventricular arrhythmias. However, amiodarone was associated with lower risk for any clinically relevant arrhythmias. Larger studies are needed to confirm this finding.
Tier 3 View Citations

E McNally, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1131

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) can be effective for the prevention of SCD in ARVD patients with extensive disease, 1 or more affected family members with SCD, or undiagnosed syncope when VT or VF has not been excluded as the cause of syncope, who are receiving chronic optimal medical therapy. However, there is not clear consensus among guidelines on the specific risk factors that identify those ARVD patients in whom the probability of SCD is sufficiently high to warrant an ICD for primary prevention. Individualized decisions for primary prevention of SCD must be based on experience, judgment, and the available data.
Tier 3 View Citations

Epstein AE, et al. (2013) PMID: 23265327, Garratt CJ, et al. (2010) PMID: 20663787, Zipes DP, et al. (2006) PMID: 16923744

In a systematic review of 18 cohort studies enrolling 610 patients who had received an ICD for primary or secondary prevention of SCD, the appropriate and inappropriate annual ICD intervention rates were 9.5% and 3.7%, respectively.
Tier 1 View Citations

Schinkel AF, et al. (2013) PMID: 23673907

Electrophysiological (EP) testing might be useful for risk assessment of SCD in patients with ARVD. The prognostic role of EP testing in patients presenting with isolated PVCs or NSVT is not known. The response to EP testing may be influenced by the severity of the disease. In one study EP testing in 17 patients with "mild" dysplasia and induced VT only in patients with spontaneous sustained VT. VT was induced in 90% of 12 patients with spontaneous sustained VT. The positive predictive value for recurrent VT was only 55%. In a second study, sustained VT could not be induced in 20 patients presenting with NSVT. In this study, inducibility was 88% in 24 of 27 patients presenting with sustained VT.
Tier 2 View Citations

Zipes DP, et al. (2006) PMID: 16923744

Surveillance

Clinical screening for cardiomyopathy is recommended at yearly intervals after age 10 to age 50 in asymptomatic individuals known to carry a disease-causing mutation(s) or at any time that signs or symptoms appear. Consider repeat screening at 1 year for any abnormal clinical screening test. Recommended screening consists of clinical history and physical exam; electrocardiogram and echocardiogram; Holter monitoring; and imaging. In an analysis of a registry of ARVD patients, all 69 patients who were diagnosed with ARVD while living demonstrated one or more ECG abnormality characteristic of ARVD. In another study, MRI was found to be 100% sensitive to those meeting ARVD diagnostic criteria.
Tier 2 View Citations

Hershberger RE, et al. (2009) PMID: 19254666

Circumstances to Avoid

ARVD is present in 4% to 22% of athletes with sudden cardiac death. There is some debate over whether high-intensity endurance exercise can cause development of ARVD and therefore should be avoided.
Tier 3 View Citations

E McNally, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1131

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Nature of Intervention

Interventions include non-invasive surveillance, long-term pharmacotherapy, and possible ICD implantation which may be associated with moderate risk and burden.\n\nBased on data from the National ICD Registry, more than 25% of procedures are to replace devices.
Context: Adult
View Citations

Hammill SC, et al. (2010) PMID: 20647056

Among patients receiving replacement ICDs between 2005 and 2010 and reported to the National ICD Registry, the median time to replacement was 4.6 years (25-75% Interquartile Range 3.7-5.8) for all types of replaced devices.
Context: Adult
View Citations

Kramer DB, et al. (2014) PMID: 24513917

In one study of 132 ARVD patients followed for a mean of 39 months, 16% of patients per year experienced an inappropriate ICD shock. In a second study, 23% of patients received inappropriate shocks during a mean follow-up period of almost 7 years.
Context: Adult
View Citations

Corrado D, et al. (2003) PMID: 14638546, Wichter T, et al. (2004) PMID: 15007002

Chance to Escape Clinical Detection

SCD may be the first manifestation of disease. Among 100 ARVD patients from a US registry, 23% of cases were identified after SCD. Establishing a presymptomatic diagnosis among family members allows monitoring for disease development and genetic counseling.
Context: Adult
Tier 2 View Citations

E McNally, et al. (2005) NCBI: NBK1131, Zipes DP, et al. (2006) PMID: 16923744

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Gene Condition Associations
OMIM Identifier Primary MONDO Identifier Additional MONDO Identifiers

References List

Ackerman MJ, Priori SG, Willems S, Berul C, Brugada R, Calkins H, Camm AJ, Ellinor PT, Gollob M, Hamilton R, Hershberger RE, Judge DP, Le Marec H, McKenna WJ, Schulze-Bahr E, Semsarian C, Towbin JA, Watkins H, Wilde A, Wolpert C, Zipes DP. (2011) HRS/EHRA expert consensus statement on the state of genetic testing for the channelopathies and cardiomyopathies this document was developed as a partnership between the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Heart rhythm : the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society. 8(8):1308-39.

ARRHYTHMOGENIC RIGHT VENTRICULAR DYSPLASIA, FAMILIAL, 10; ARVD10. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 610193, (2015) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

ARRHYTHMOGENIC RIGHT VENTRICULAR DYSPLASIA, FAMILIAL, 5; ARVD5. Online Medelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM: 604400, (2013) World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/

Charron P, Arad M, Arbustini E, Basso C, Bilinska Z, Elliott P, Helio T, Keren A, McKenna WJ, Monserrat L, Pankuweit S, Perrot A, Rapezzi C, Ristic A, Seggewiss H, van Langen I, Tavazzi L. (2010) Genetic counselling and testing in cardiomyopathies: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. European heart journal. 31(22):2715-26.

Corrado D, Leoni L, Link MS, Della Bella P, Gaita F, Curnis A, Salerno JU, Igidbashian D, Raviele A, Disertori M, Zanotto G, Verlato R, Vergara G, Delise P, Turrini P, Basso C, Naccarella F, Maddalena F, Estes NA 3rd, Buja G, Thiene G. (2003) Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy for prevention of sudden death in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia. Circulation. 108(25):3084-91.

Dalal D, Nasir K, Bomma C, Prakasa K, Tandri H, Piccini J, Roguin A, Tichnell C, James C, Russell SD, Judge DP, Abraham T, Spevak PJ, Bluemke DA, Calkins H. (2005) Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia: a United States experience. Circulation. 112(25):3823-32.

E McNally, H MacLeod, L Dellefave-Castillo. Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy. (2005) [Updated Jan 09 2014]. In: RA Pagon, MP Adam, HH Ardinger, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1131/

Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, Estes NA 3rd, Freedman RA, Gettes LS, Gillinov AM, Gregoratos G, Hammill SC, Hayes DL, Hlatky MA, Newby LK, Page RL, Schoenfeld MH, Silka MJ, Stevenson LW, Sweeney MO, Tracy CM, Epstein AE, Darbar D, DiMarco JP, Dunbar SB, Estes NA 3rd, Ferguson TB Jr, Hammill SC, Karasik PE, Link MS, Marine JE, Schoenfeld MH, Shanker AJ, Silka MJ, Stevenson LW, Stevenson WG, Varosy PD. (2013) 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 61(3):e6-75.

Garratt CJ, Elliott P, Behr E, Camm AJ, Cowan C, Cruickshank S, Grace A, Griffith MJ, Jolly A, Lambiase P, McKeown P, O'Callagan P, Stuart G, Watkins H. (2010) Heart Rhythm UK position statement on clinical indications for implantable cardioverter defibrillators in adult patients with familial sudden cardiac death syndromes. Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 12(8):1156-75.

Gollob MH, Blier L, Brugada R, Champagne J, Chauhan V, Connors S, Gardner M, Green MS, Gow R, Hamilton R, Harris L, Healey JS, Hodgkinson K, Honeywell C, Kantoch M, Kirsh J, Krahn A, Mullen M, Parkash R, Redfearn D, Rutberg J, Sanatani S, Woo A. (2011) Recommendations for the use of genetic testing in the clinical evaluation of inherited cardiac arrhythmias associated with sudden cardiac death: Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society joint position paper. The Canadian journal of cardiology. 27(2):232-45.

Hammill SC, Kremers MS, Stevenson LW, Heidenreich PA, Lang CM, Curtis JP, Wang Y, Berul CI, Kadish AH, Al-Khatib SM, Pina IL, Walsh MN, Mirro MJ, Lindsay BD, Reynolds MR, Pontzer K, Blum L, Masoudi F, Rumsfeld J, Brindis RG. (2010) Review of the registry's fourth year, incorporating lead data and pediatric ICD procedures, and use as a national performance measure. Heart rhythm : the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society. 7(9):1340-5.

Hershberger RE, Lindenfeld J, Mestroni L, Seidman CE, Taylor MR, Towbin JA. (2009) Genetic evaluation of cardiomyopathy--a Heart Failure Society of America practice guideline. Journal of cardiac failure. 15(2):83-97.

Kramer DB, Kennedy KF, Spertus JA, Normand SL, Noseworthy PA, Buxton AE, Josephson ME, Zimetbaum PJ, Mitchell SL, Reynolds MR. (2014) Mortality risk following replacement implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation at end of battery life: results from the NCDR. Heart rhythm : the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society. 11(2):216-21.

Marcus FI, McKenna WJ, Sherrill D, Basso C, Bauce B, Bluemke DA, Calkins H, Corrado D, Cox MG, Daubert JP, Fontaine G, Gear K, Hauer R, Nava A, Picard MH, Protonotarios N, Saffitz JE, Sanborn DM, Steinberg JS, Tandri H, Thiene G, Towbin JA, Tsatsopoulou A, Wichter T, Zareba W. (2010) Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: proposed modification of the Task Force Criteria. European heart journal. 31(7):806-14.

Schinkel AF. (2013) Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy: patient outcomes, incidence of appropriate and inappropriate interventions, and complications. Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology. 6(3):562-8.

Te Rijdt WP, Jongbloed JD, de Boer RA, Thiene G, Basso C, van den Berg MP, van Tintelen JP. (2014) Clinical utility gene card for: arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). European journal of human genetics : EJHG. 22(2).

Wichter T, Paul M, Wollmann C, Acil T, Gerdes P, Ashraf O, Tjan TD, Soeparwata R, Block M, Borggrefe M, Scheld HH, Breithardt G, Bocker D. (2004) Implantable cardioverter/defibrillator therapy in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: single-center experience of long-term follow-up and complications in 60 patients. Circulation. 109(12):1503-8.

Zipes DP, Camm AJ, Borggrefe M, Buxton AE, Chaitman B, Fromer M, Gregoratos G, Klein G, Moss AJ, Myerburg RJ, Priori SG, Quinones MA, Roden DM, Silka MJ, Tracy C, Blanc JJ, Budaj A, Dean V, Deckers JW, Despres C, Dickstein K, Lekakis J, McGregor K, Metra M, Morais J, Osterspey A, Tamargo JL, Zamorano JL, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Antman EM, Anderson JL, Hunt SA, Halperin JL, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B. (2006) ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death--executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death) Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. European heart journal. 27(17):2099-140.

Early Rule-Out Summary

This topic passed the early rule out stage

Findings of Early Rule-Out Assessment

  1. Is there a qualifying resource, such as a practice guideline or systematic review, for the genetic condition?
  2. Does the practice guideline or systematic review indicate that the result is actionable in one or more of the following ways?
  3. a. Patient Management

    b. Surveillance or Screening

    c. Circumstances to Avoid

  4. Is it actionable in an undiagnosed adult with the condition?
  5. Is this condition an important health problem?
  6. Is there at least on known pathogenic variant with at least moderate penetrance (≥40%) or moderate relative risk (≥2) in any population?