Actionability Assertions

Gene Condition (MONDO ID) OMIM ID Final Assertion
No assertions found.

Actionability Assertion Rationale

  • This topic was initially scored prior to development of the process for making actionability assertions. The Actionability Working Group decided to defer making an assertion until after the topic could be reviewed through the update process.

Actionability Scores

Outcome / Intervention Pair Severity Likelihood Effectiveness Nature of Intervention Total Score
Neuropathy / Avoidance of triggers 1 3C 0C 3 7CC
View scoring key
Domain of Actionability Scoring Metric State of the Knowledgebase
Severity: What is the nature of the threat to health to an individual? 3 = Sudden death as a reasonably possible outcome
2 = Reasonable possibility of death or major morbidity
1 = Modest morbidity
0 = Minimal or no morbidity
N/A
Likelihood: What is the chance that the outcome will occur? 3 = >40% chance
2 = 5%-39% chance
1 = 1%-4% chance
0 = <1% chance
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Effectiveness: What is the effectiveness of a specific intervention in preventing or diminishing the risk of harm? 3 = Highly effective
2 = Moderately effective
1 = Minimally effective
0 = Controversial or unknown effectiveness
IN = Ineffective/No interventiona
A = Substantial evidence or evidence from a high tier (tier 1)
B = Moderate evidence or evidence from a moderate tier (tier 2)
C = Minimal evidence or evidence from a lower tier (tier 3 or 4)
D = Poor evidence or evidence not provided in the report
N = Evidence based on expert contributions (tier 5)
Nature of intervention: How risky, medically burdensome, or intensive is the intervention? 3 = Low risk, or medically acceptable and low intensity
2 = Moderate risk, moderately acceptable or intensive
1 = Greater risk, less acceptable and substantial intensity
0 = High risk, poorly acceptable or intensive
N/A
a Do not score the remaining categories

Prevalence of the Genetic Condition

The prevalence of hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP) is not well known, though it has been estimated between 1/50,000 and 1/14,000. The actual prevalence may be higher because of under diagnosis. A study of the Finnish population found that prevalence may be as high as 1/6,250.
View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1392, Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 640., van Paassen BW, et al. (2014) PMID: 24646194

Clinical Features (Signs / symptoms)

HNPP is characterized by episodic focal motor and sensory peripheral neuropathies in the hands and feet. These attacks are typically painless. The nerve palsies often recur over a period of many years, but some individuals have a single episode and others with a pathogenic variant remain asymptomatic. In many cases these symptoms are triggered by mechanical stresses to the nerve, such as compression, repetitive movement and/or stretching of the affected limbs. Common clinical manifestations include carpal tunnel syndrome and peroneal palsy with foot drop. In 50% of cases, recovery from the acute neuropathy is complete within a few days to months. Incomplete recovery is common, though the resulting disability rarely severe. Chronic motor deficits after nerve palsies are noted in 10-15%. In rare cases, strenuous activities can lead to severe and prolonged limb paralysis. Atypical presentations of HNPP are common and can include: recurrent positional short-term sensory symptoms, progressive mononeuropathy, Charcot-Marie-Tooth like polyneuropathy, chronic sensory polyneuropathy, and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy-like disorder.
View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1392, Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 640., van Paassen BW, et al. (2014) PMID: 24646194

Natural History (Important subgroups & survival / recovery)

Most individuals with HNPP typically experience their first episode in the second or third decade at a mean age of 37 years, but with a large range from birth through the eighth decade. The most common presenting symptom is acute onset of a focal neuropathy of a single nerve (mononeuropathy). Males and females are equally affected. Occasional episodes have been reported during pregnancy, likely related to physiological changes. Older patients often develop a symmetric sensory motor polyneuropathy. HNPP is not life threatening, and patients have a normal life expectancy.
View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1392, Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 640., van Paassen BW, et al. (2014) PMID: 24646194

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Dominant

Prevalence of Genetic Variants

1-2 in 50000
The prevalence of pathogenic variants in PMP22 associated with HNPP was unavailable. However, PMP22 accounts for an estimated 100% of HNPP cases and thus the prevalence of pathogenic variants in PMP22 is expected to be similar to the prevalence of HNPP, or between 1/50,000 and 1/20,000.
Tier 4 View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1392, Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 640., van Paassen BW, et al. (2014) PMID: 24646194

Penetrance (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

>= 40 %
Studies screening relatives of index patients have identified that 6-23% of family members may be asymptomatic. These rates are not reported within the context of the exposure to potential triggers.
Tier 3 View Citations

van Paassen BW, et al. (2014) PMID: 24646194

Relative Risk (Includes any high-risk racial or ethnic subgroups)

Unknown
Information regarding relative risk was unavailable.

Expressivity

Large intrafamilial clinical variability has been noted.
Tier 4 View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1392, van Paassen BW, et al. (2014) PMID: 24646194

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Patient Management

To establish the extent of disease following diagnosis the following evaluations are recommended:

• History of focal nerve symptoms

• Family history

• Neurologic examination

• Electromyography/nerve conduction velocity

• Clinical genetics consultation.

Tier 4 View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1392

Protective pads at the elbows or knees may prevent pressure and trauma to local nerves.
Tier 4 View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1392, Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies. Orphanet encyclopedia, ORPHA: 640.

Surveillance

Circumstances to Avoid

Patients are advised to avoid prolonged sitting with legs crossed, prolonged leaning on the elbows, occupations requiring repetitive movements of the wrist, and rapid weight loss as these have been reported in case reports as being associated with the onset of HNPP symptoms.
Tier 3 View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1392, van Paassen BW, et al. (2014) PMID: 24646194

Vincristine, used in chemotherapy, has been reported to exacerbate HNPP. A single case report related to this exposure was identified. No studies were identified reporting the rate of developing HNPP symptoms following vincristine exposure
Tier 3 View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1392, van Paassen BW, et al. (2014) PMID: 24646194

An overview of case reports addressing Charcot Marie Tooth (CMT) and toxic medication effects identified 22 reports (30 patients) addressing vincristine toxicity; however it is unclear whether this evidence may apply to HNPP. 18 of 30 patients developed marked sensory symptoms or new onset weakness, with some developing dysarthria and dysphagia. Nearly all reports describe eventual improvement, but frequently not to baseline levels. These cases occurred in both adults (15) and children (15). Most individuals having a reaction were previously unsuspected or undiagnosed with CMT (26 of 30) and were only recognized following administration of vincristine; however, 10 cases, in retrospect, had overt clinical signs or a close relative with known CMT.
Tier 5 View Citations

Weimer LH, et al. (2006) PMID: 16386273

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.

Nature of Intervention

The interventions identified in this report include wearing protective pads and avoidance of potential triggers including vincristine.
Context: Adult

Chance to Escape Clinical Detection

Individuals with HNPP are typically identified after their first episode and diagnosed via genetic testing and/or electrophysiological studies. Thus, patients are likely to escape detection prior to their first episode. Given pain is often a presenting symptom, individuals with HNPP are often clinically misdiagnosed with fibromyalgia upon presentation.
Context: Adult
Tier 4 View Citations

TD Bird, et al. (1998) NCBI: NBK1392, van Paassen BW, et al. (2014) PMID: 24646194

Description of sources of evidence:

Tier 1: Evidence from a systematic review or a meta-analysis or clinical practice guideline clearly based on a systematic review.
Tier 2: Evidence from clinical practice guidelines or broad-based expert consensus with non-systematic evidence review.
Tier 3: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with primary literature cited.
Tier 4: Evidence from another source with non-systematic review of evidence with no citations to primary data sources.
Tier 5: Evidence from a non-systematically identified source.
Gene Condition Associations
OMIM Identifier Primary MONDO Identifier Additional MONDO Identifiers

References List

Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies. Orphanet encyclopedia, http://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=en&Expert=640

TD Bird. Hereditary Neuropathy with Liability to Pressure Palsies. (1998) [Updated Sep 25 2014]. In: RA Pagon, MP Adam, HH Ardinger, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1392/

van Paassen BW, van der Kooi AJ, van Spaendonck-Zwarts KY, Verhamme C, Baas F, de Visser M. (2014) PMP22 related neuropathies: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A and Hereditary Neuropathy with liability to Pressure Palsies. Orphanet journal of rare diseases. 9(1750-1172):38.

Weimer LH, Podwall D. (2006) Medication-induced exacerbation of neuropathy in Charcot Marie Tooth disease. Journal of the neurological sciences. 242(1-2):47-54.

Early Rule-Out Summary

This topic passed the early rule out stage

Findings of Early Rule-Out Assessment

  1. Is there a qualifying resource, such as a practice guideline or systematic review, for the genetic condition?
  2. Does the practice guideline or systematic review indicate that the result is actionable in one or more of the following ways?
  3. a. Patient Management

    b. Surveillance or Screening

    c. Circumstances to Avoid

  4. Is it actionable in an undiagnosed adult with the condition?
  5. Is this condition an important health problem?
  6. Is there at least on known pathogenic variant with at least moderate penetrance (≥40%) or moderate relative risk (≥2) in any population?